• Gustav Konrad von Schulthess


Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has rapidly evolved from its first experimental clinical trials in 1980 to become a method that is used routinely and that is the primary modality for diagnosing such diseases as cerebral tumors and many musculoskeletal disorders such as avascular necrosis of the hip. In general, imaging the morphology of nonmoving parts of the human body is no longer a challenge to MRI. However, in the chest and the abdomen, where non suppressible, physiologic motion prevails, MRI still has to prove its advantages. Despite this, there is little doubt that MRI will be a very useful imaging method also in the chest and the abdomen. The advantages of MRI result from the versatility of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) phenomenon, and this versatility is only now beginning to be explored for imaging purposes. There are two important qualities of MRI in addition to its high spatial resolution that are likely to dominate future developments.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin Echo Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiment Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bloch F, Hansen WW, Packard ME (1946) Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 69: 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Purcell EM, Torrey HC, Pound RV (1946) Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys Rev 69: 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hahn EL (1950) Spin echos. Phys Rev 80: 580Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singer JR (1959) Blood-flow rates by NMR measurements. Science 130: 1652–1655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stejiskal EO, Tanner JE (1965) Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 42: 288–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bloembergen N (1949) On the interaction of nuclear spins in a crystalline lattice. Physica 15: 386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    La Mar GN, De Horrocks W, Horn RH (1973) NMR of paramagnetic molecules. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dwek RA (1973) NMR in Biochemistry. Clarendon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lauterbur PC (1973) Image formation by induced local interactions. Examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 242: 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mansfield P, Grannell PK (1973) NMR ’diffraction’ in solids. J Phys C6, L422Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Damadian R (1974) Apparatus and method for detecting cancer in tissue. US Patent # 3,789, 832Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar A, Welti D, Ernst RR (1975) NMR Fourier zeugmatography. J Mag Resonance 18: 63–89Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haase A, Mattaei D, Hanicke W, Merboldt KD (1986) Flash imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. J Magnetic Resonance 67: 258–266Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Utz JA, Herfkens RJ, Heinsimer JA (1987) Cine MR determination of left ventricular ejection fraction. AJR 148: 839–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mansfield P, Morris PG (1982) NMR imaging in biomedicine. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rzedzian RR, Pykett IL (1987) Instant images of the human heart using a new, whole-body MR imaging system. AJR 149: 245–250PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustav Konrad von Schulthess
    • 1
  1. 1.Departement Medizinische RadiologieUniversitätsspital ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations