Abstract
Communicating with computers is becoming increasingly important in our technological environment. Unfortunately the quality of the texts that appear on the display screen is often far from perfect. Numerous complaints — and the occasional alarming press report — testify to this. Is there any possibility of improvement? In most cases visual display texts can indeed be shown in such a way that they can be read perfectly. A lot of improvements can often be made to the layout, the typeform, and use of color. In a number of cases, however, there is still uncertainty about our visual perception capabilities. Further research is thus called for. In what follows, some basic properties of the visual reading process will first be described. Then, the separate effects of the use of layout, color and typography on legibility will be treated explicitly, followed by some illustrations of the combined effect of the three image parameters. These illustrations, as well as all others in this paper, refer to videotex pages as used to be broadcast, regularly or in experiments, by the Dutch Teletext service. Finally, some practical rules are formulated which mostly apply to multicolor text displays in general and, to a certain extent, also to the use of graphics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bouma H. (1980). Visual reading processes and the quality of text displays. In: Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals, E. Grandjean & E. Vigliani (Eds.). Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 101–114.
Bouwhuis D.G. (1979). Visual recognition of words. Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University of Nijmegen.
Bruce M. & Foster J.J. (1982). The visibility of colored characters on colored backgrounds in viewdata displays. Visible Language, 16, pp. 382–390.
Cahill M.C. & Carter R.C. Jr. (1976). Color code size for searching displays of different density. Human Factors, 18, pp. 273–280.
Engel F.L. (1980). Information selection from visual display units. In: Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals, E. Grandjean & E. Vibliani (Eds.). Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 121–125.
Klare G.R. (1969). The measurement of readability. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp. 1–2.
Nes F.L. van (1984). Limits of visual perception in the technology of visual display terminals. Behaviour and Information Technology, 3, pp. 371–377.
Nes F.L. van (1986). A new Teletext character set with enhanced legibility. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 33, pp. 1222–1225.
Poulton E.C. (1967). Searching for newspaper headlines, printed in capitals or lower-case letters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, pp. 417–425.
Reynolds L. (1979). Teletext and viewdata a new challenge for the designer. Information Design Journal, 1, pp. 2–14.
Smith S.L. & McCombs M.E. (1971). The graphics of prose. Journalism Quarterly, 48, pp. 134–136.
Tinker M.A. (1964). Legibility of Print. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
Woodworth R.S. and Schlosberg H. (1954). Experimental Psychology. Methuen, London.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
van Nes, F.L. (1988). The Legibility of Visual Display Texts. In: van der Veer, G.C., Mulder, G. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73402-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73402-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73404-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73402-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive