Advertisement

Method Development for Applying Pollen Selection in Cucumber Breeding Programmes: Effects of Centrifugation on Pollen Competence

  • R. J. Bino
  • J. Franken
  • E. van der Zeeuw
Conference paper

Abstract

The possibility to use large populations of haploid genomes makes pollen a potentially efficient plant system to select for sporophytes bearing favorable traits. Screening pollen for sporophytic features is only possible if genes responsible for the particular traits are also expressed during microgametophyte development. Tanksley et al. (1981) and Willing and Mascarenhas (1984) showed that about 60 % of the genes are correspondingly expressed in the gametophytic and sporophytic life cycle of the plant. Overlap in gene expression is also evident from the parallel responses in pollen and plants for tolerances and sensitivities for a wide range of agents (e.g., Mulcahy et al., 1985; Bino et al., 1987). In addition, pathogenesis related processes and mechanisms involved in disease resistance are expressed in both vegetative and generative tissues (Laughnan and Gabay, 1973; Bino et al., 1988). The potential of pollen selection in plant breeding programmes, however, depends on the development of methods for pollen manipulation. As discussed by Bino and Stephenson (1988), selection conditions and methods forseparation and concentration of selected from non- selected pollen have to be optimized, while techniques for the application (pollination) of manipulated microgarnetophytes on pistils insuring fertilization need to be improved.

Keywords

Pollen Tube Alternaria Alternata Pollen Selection High Centrifugal Force Pollen Germination Percentage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bino RJ, Franken J, Witsenboer HMA, Hille J, Dons JJM (1988) Effects of Alternaria alternata f.sp. lycopersici toxins on pollen. Theor Appl Genet (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Bino RJ, Hille J, Franken J (1987) Kanamycin resistance during in vitro development of pollen from transgenic tomato plants. Plant Cell Reports 6: 333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bino RJ, Stephenson AG (1988) Selection and manipulation of pollen and sperm cells. In: Wilms HJ, Keijzer CJ (eds) Plant sperm cells as emerging tools for crop biotechnology. Pudoc Wageningen, The Netherlands (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Kho YO, Baer J (1968) Observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Euphytica 17: 298–302Google Scholar
  5. Kyo M, Harada H (1985) Studies on conditions for cell division and embryogenesis in isolated pollen culture of Nicotiana rustica. Plant Physiol 79: 90–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Laughnan JR, Gabay SJ (1973) Reaction of germinating maize pollen to Helminthosporium maydis pathotoxins. Crop Sci 13: 681–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mulcahy DL, Bergamini Mulcahy G, Ottaviano E (eds) (1985) Biotechnology and ecology of pollen. Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg Tokyo, pp 528Google Scholar
  8. Tanksley SD, Zamir D, Rick CM (1981) Evidence for extensive overlap of sporophytic and gametophytic gene expression in Lycopersicon esculentum. Science 213: 453–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Willing RP, Mascarenhas JP (1984) Analysis of the complexity and diversity of mRNAs from pollen and shoots of Tradescantia palludosa. Plant Physiol 78: 887–890Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Bino
    • 1
  • J. Franken
    • 1
  • E. van der Zeeuw
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Horticultural Plant Breeding (IVT)WageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of GeneticsAgricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations