Comparison of Discriminative Stimuli Produced by Full and Partial Benzodiazepine Agonists: Pharmacological Specificity

  • D. A. Bennett
Part of the Psychopharmacology Series book series (PSYCHOPHARM, volume 4)


Benzodiazepines produce discriminative stimuli that are stereospecific and antagonized by specific benzodiazepine receptor antagonists. The potency of these stimuli correlate with the ability of these compounds to bind to the benzodiazepine receptor complex. These data indicate that benzodiazepine stimuli are transduced via the benzodiazepine receptor. The underlying basis of these stimuli is unclear. Results with novel compounds that produce preclinical anxiolytic effects without the sedation and muscle relaxation of the classical benzodiazepines suggest that muscle relaxation may contribute to these stimuli. A direct comparison of discriminative stimuli established on a classical benzodiazepine agonist with the stimuli established on a partial benzodiazepine agonist supports the possibility that the classical benzodiazepine cue is mediated by a muscle relaxant effect, while the partial agonist cue is related to the anxioselectivity of the compound.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1983) Lorazepam and pentobarbital drug discrimination in baboons: cross-drug generalization and interaction with Ro 15–1788. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 226:776–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1984) Discriminative stimulus properties of novel anxiolytics. Fed Proc 43: 930Google Scholar
  3. Ator NA, Griffiths RR (1985) Lorazepam and pentobarbital discriminations: interactions withCGS 8216 and caffeine. Eur J Pharmacol 107:169–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry III H, Krimmer EC (1978 a) Pharmacology of discriminative drug stimuli. In: Ho BT, Richard III BW, Chute DL (eds) Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. Academic, New York, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  5. Barry III H, Krimmer EC (1978 b) Similarities and differences in discriminative effects of chlor- diazepoxide, pentobarbital, ethanol, and other sedatives. In: Colpaert FC, Rosecrans JA (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 243–252Google Scholar
  6. Bennett DA (1983) The nonsedating potential anxiolytic, CGS 9896 (2-(p-chlorophenyl)- pyrazolo [3,4-c]quinoline-3(5H)-one, in drug discrimination models. Pharmacologist 25:155Google Scholar
  7. Bennett DA (1985) The non-sedating anxiolytic CGS 9896 produces discriminative stimuli thatmay be related to an anxioselective effect. Life Sci 37:703–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett DA, Amrick CL (1986) 2-Amino-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid produces discriminativestimuli and anticonflict effects similar to diazepam. Life Sci 39:2455–2461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett DA, Petrack B (1984) CGS 9896: a nonbenzodiazepine, nonsedating potential anxiolytic. Drug Dev Res 4:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett DA, Amrick CL, Wilson DE, Bernard PS, Yokoyama N, Liebman JM (1985) Behavioral pharmacological profile of CGS 9895: a novel anxiomodulator with selective benzodiazepine agonist and antagonist properties. Drug Dev Res 6:313–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernard PS, Bennett DA, Pastor G, Yokoyama N, Liebman JM (1985) CGS 9896: agonist-antagonist benzodiazepine receptor activity revealed by anxiolytic, anticonvulsant and muscle relaxation in rodents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235:98–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Boast CA, Bernard PS, Barbaz BS, Bergen KM (1983) The neuropharmacology of various benzodiazepine antagonists. Neuropharmacology 22:1511–1521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonetti EP, Pieri L, Cumin R, Schaffner R, Pieri M, Gamzu ER, Muller RKM, Haefely W (1982) Benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15–1788: neurological and behavioral effects. Psychopharma- cology 78:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braestrup C, Nielsen M (1983) Benzodiazepine receptors. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH(eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 17. Plenum, New York, pp 285–384Google Scholar
  15. Braestrup C, Squires RF (1977) Specific benzodiazepine receptors in rat brain characterized byhigh-affinity 3H-diazepam binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:3805–3809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colpaert FC (1977) Discriminative stimulus properties of benzodiazepines and barbiturates. In:Lai H (ed) Stimulus properties of drags. Plenum, New York, pp 93–106Google Scholar
  17. Colpaert FC, Desmedt LKC, Janssen PAJ (1976) Discriminative stimulus properties of benzodiazepines, barbiturates and pharmacologically related drugs: relation to some intrinsic and anticonvulsant effects. Eur J Pharmacol 37:113–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Corradi CL, Bennett DA, Diverio J, Wilson DE (1985) The differential sedative/muscle relaxant profiles of several classical and novel anxiomodulators in four behavioral paradigms. Neurosci Abst 11:425Google Scholar
  19. Dantzer R, Perio A (1982) Behavioural evidence for partial agonist properties of Ro 15–1788, a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol 81:655–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De La Garza R, Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1983) Discriminative stimulus effects of oxazepamand pentobarbital. Fed Proc 42:620Google Scholar
  21. Garcha HS, Rose IC, Stolerman IP (1985) Midazolam cue in rats: generalization tests withanxiolytic and other drugs. Psychopharmacology 87:233–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haug T (1983) Neuropharmacological specificity of the diazepam complex: effects of agonistsand antagonists. Eur J Pharmacol 93:221–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haug T, Gotestam KG (1982 a) The diazepam stimulus complex: specificity in a rat model. Eur J Pharmacol 80:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haug T, Gotestam KG (1982b) Onset and offset of the diazepam stimulus complex. PharmacolBiochem Behav 17:1171–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herling S, Shannon HE (1982) Ro-15–1788 antagonizes the discriminative stimulus effects ofdiazepam in rats but not similar effects of pentobarbital. Life Sci 31:2105–2112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johansson JO, Jarbe TUC (1975) Diazepam as a discriminative cue: its antagonism by beme-gride. Eur J Pharmacol 30:372–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katzman NJ, Shannon HE (1985) Differential diazepam-antagonist effects of the benzodiazepine receptor ligand CGS 9895 in rodents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235:589–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lippa A, Coupet J, Greenblatt EN, Klepner CA, Beer B (1979) A synthetic non-benzodiazepine ligand for benzodiazepine receptors: a probe for investigating neuronal substrates of anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:99–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McElroy JF, Feldman RS (1982) Generalization between benzodiazepine- and triazolopyrid- azine-elicited discriminative cues. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:709–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohler H, Okada T (1977a) Properties of 3H-diazepam binding to benzodiazepine receptors in rat cerebral cortex. Life Sci 20:2102–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohler H, Okada T (1977b) Benzodiazepine receptor: demonstration in the central nervous system. Science 198:849–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohler H, Okada T (1978) Biochemical identification of the site of action of benzodiazepines in human brain by 3H-diazepam binding. Life Sci 22:985–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen EB, Valentine JD, Holohean AM, Appel JB (1983) Benzodiazepine receptor mediated discriminative cues: effects of GABA-ergic drugs and inverse agonists. Life Sci 33:2213–2220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Overton DA (1966) State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10:6–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Overton DA (1971) Discriminative control of behavior by drug states. In: Thompson T, Pickens R (eds) Stimulus properties of drugs. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 87–100Google Scholar
  36. Overton DA (1976) Discriminable effects of benzodiazepines. Psychopharmacol Commun 2:339–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Petersen EN, Jensen LH, Honore T, Braestrup C, Kehr W, Stephens DN, Wachtel H, Seidelman D, Schmiechen R (1984) ZK 91296, a partial agonist at benzodiazepine receptors. Psycho- pharmacology 83:240–248Google Scholar
  38. Sanger DJ, Joly D, Zivkovic B (1985) Behavioral effects of nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic drugs: a comparison of CGS 9896 and zopiclone with chlordiazepoxide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 232:831–837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schechter MD (1984) Specific antagonism of the behavioral effects of chlordiazepoxide andpentobarbital in the rat. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 8:359–364Google Scholar
  40. Shannon HE, Herling S (1983a) Discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats: evidence for a maximal effect. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 227:160–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shannon HE, Herling S (1983b) Antagonism of the discriminative effects of diazepam by pyrazoloquinolines in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 92:155–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shannon HE, Holtzman SG (1979) Morphine training dose: a determinant of stimulus generalization to narcotic antagonists in the rat. Psychopharmacology 61:238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spealman RD (1985) Discriminative-stimulus effects of midazolam in squirrel monkeys: a comparison with other drugs and antagonism by Ro 15–1788. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235:456-462Google Scholar
  44. Stephens DN, Shearman GT, Kehr W (1984) Discriminative stimulus properties of B-carbolines characterized as agonists and inverse agonists at central benzodiazepine receptors. Psychopharmacology 83:233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stolerman IP, D’Mello GD (1981) Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats. Psychopharmacology 73:295–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Bennett
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Department, Pharmaceuticals DivisionCIBA-GEIGY CorporationSummitUSA

Personalised recommendations