Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIG,volume 18))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

Genetic engineering offers the promise of major advances in many areas of science, including agriculture, medicine, and chemical manufacturing [1]. Products of this technology, however, may also pose unknown risks to human health and the environment. Recent surveys show that while 62% of the public believe that genetic engineering will improve the quality of life, 52% think that it is inherently dangerous [2]. As with any new product, anticipated benefits must be balanced with potential risks. Before this task can be accomplished, however, a framework must be established to assess the risks associated with deliberate environmental releases of genetically altered organisms.

Research was sponsored by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency under Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Contract No. DE-AC05–84OR21400 with the U. S. Department of Energy. Accordingly, the U. S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U. S. Government purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fiksel, J. and V. T. Covello, “The Suitability and Applicability of Risk Assessment Methods for Environmental Applications of Biotechnology,” in J. Fiksel and V. T. Covello (eds.), “Biotechnology Risk Assessment,” Pergamon Press, 1986, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ezzell, C., “U. S. Attitudes to Biotechnology Show Qualified Support,” Nature, Vol. 327, 1987, p. 453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kingsbury, D. T., “The Regulatory ‘Coordinated Framework’ for Biotechnology,” Bio/Technol, Vol. 4, No. 12, 1986, pp. 1071–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller, H. I., “‘Old’ Biotechnology, ‘New’ Biotechnology and Risk Assessment: A Perspective,” Presented at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, Rome, Italy, June 6–10, 1987. (not yet published)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, J. D. and J. Tooze, “The DNA Story, A Documentary History of Gene Cloning,” H.F. Freeman Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Academy of Sciences, “Introduction of Recombinant DNA-Engineered Organisms into the Environment: Key Issues,” Prepared by the Committee on the Introduction of Genetically Engineered Organisms into the Environment, Washington, DC, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson, D. A, “Witness Panel,” Recom. DNA Technol. Bull, Vol. 7, 1984, pp. 196–198.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Franklin, C. A, E. R. Nestmann, and L. Ritter, “Risk Assessment and Regulation of Genetically Engineered Products,” in H. M. LeBaron, R. O. Mumma, R. C. Honeycutt, J. H. Duesing, J.F. Phillips, and M. J. Haas (eds.), “Biotechnology in Agricultural Chemistry,” American Chemical Society Series No. 334, 1987, pp. 336–351.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindemann, J, G. J. Warren, and T. V. Suslow, “Ice-Nucleating Bacteria,” Science, Vol. 231,1986, p. 536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Simberloff, D. S., “Witness Panel,” Recom. DNA Technol. Bull, Vol. 7, 1984, pp. 196–198.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brill, W. J, “Safety Concerns and Genetic Engineering in Agriculture, “Science, Vol. 227, 1985, pp. 381–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillett, J. W, “Risk Assessment Methodologies for Biotechnology Impact Assessment,” Environ. Manage, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1986, pp. 512–532.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levy, S. B, “Human Exposure and Effects Analysis for Genetically Modified Bacteria,” in J. Fiksel and V.T. Covello (eds.), “Biotechnology Risk Assessment,” Pergamon Press, 1986, pp. 56–74.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cairns, J, Jr. and J. R. Pratt, “Ecological Consequence Assessment: Effects of Bioengineered Organisms,” in J. Fiksel and V. T. Covello (eds.), “Biotechnology Risk Assessment,” Pergamon Press, 1986, pp. 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barnthouse, L. W. and A. V. Palumbo, “Assessing the Transport and Fate of Bioengineered Microorganisms in the Environment,” in J. Fikseland, V. T. Covello (eds.), “Biotechnology Risk Assessment,” Pergamon Press, 1986, pp. 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Halvorson, H. O., D. Pramer, and M. Rogul (eds), “Engineered Organisms in the Environment: Scientific Issues,” American Society for Microbiology, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gillett, J. W., A. M. Stern, M. A. Harwell, and S. A. Levin, “Executive Summary,” Environ. Manage., Vol. 10, No. 4, 1986, pp. 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander, M., “Fate and Movement of Microorganisms in the Environment. Part 1. Survival and Growth of Bacteria, “ Environ. Manage., Vol. 10, No. 4, 1986, pp. 463–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang, L. N., J. L. Sinclair, C. M. Mallory, and M. Alexander, “Fate in Model Ecosystems of Microbial Species of Potential Use in Genetic Engineering,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Vol. 44, No. 3, 1982, pp. 708–714.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Andow, D. A., “Fate and Movement of Microorganisms in the Environment. Part 2. Dispersal of Microorganisms with Emphasis on Bacteria,” Environ. Manage., Vol. 10, No. 4, 1986, pp. 470–487.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bovallius, A., R. Roffey, and E. Henningson, “Long-Range Transmission of Bacteria,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Vol. 353, 1980, pp. 186–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. University of California, “Ice Nucleating Minus Research Field Test: Draft Environmental Impact Report”, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Berkley, California, 1986. (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  23. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Hazard Evaluation Division’s Final Position on Lindow Experimental Use Permit Applications,” Memo to Tom Ellwanger, Head, Technical Support Section, from Fred Betz, Hazard Evaluation Division, Washington, DC, 1986. (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lindemann, J. and G D. Upper, “Aerial Dispersion of Epiphytic Bacteria over Bean Plants,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Vol. 50, No. 5, 1985, p. 1227.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Institutes of Health, “Environmental Assessment and Findings of No Significant Impacts,” in “Ice Nucleating Minus Research Field Test: Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendices,” Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Berkley, 1985. (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lindemann, J., Advanced Genetic Sciences, Personal Communication, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rissler, J. F., “Research Needs for Biotic Environmental Effects of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms,” Recom. DNA Technol. Bull., Vol. 6, 1984, pp. 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Travis, C.C., Hattemer-Frey, H.A. (1988). Risk Assessment Strategies for Biotechnology. In: Fiksel, J., Covello, V.T. (eds) Safety Assurance for Environmental Introductions of Genetically-Engineered Organisms. NATO ASI Series, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73169-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73169-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73171-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73169-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics