Abstract
Unsuccessful oral cholecystography is generally followed by a second peroral or intravenous procedure, necessitating additional patient preparation and hospitalization. It is practical to carry out the second cholecystography immediately after the first, and to use an intravenous compound as contrast medium. The procedure, called combined or “refill” cholecystography (RC), became standard in the 1950s, after Biligrafin, a low-toxicity compound, had appeared on the market.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berk RN, Leopold GR (1978) The present status of imaging the gallbladder. Invest Radiol 13:477–479
Hoffel JC, Burger G, Senot P, Claudon M (1980) Oral cholecystography: Is the fatty meal always necessary? Radiology 20:24–25
Schreiner GE (1966) Nephrotoxicity and diagnostic agents. JAMA 196:413–415
Editorial (1971) Contrast media and the kidney. Br Med J 2:4–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Elek, S., Elekes, I., Polgári, I., Bor, K., Csákány, G. (1988). Effects of Subsequent Peroral or Intravenous (“Refill”) Cholegraphy on Kidney Function in Dogs. In: Chambers, P.L., Chambers, C.M., Dirheimer, G. (eds) The Target Organ and the Toxic Process. Archives of Toxicology, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73113-6_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73113-6_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18512-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73113-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive