The Necessity of Population Genetics for Understanding Evolution: An Ecologist’s View

  • A. A. Dhondt
Conference paper

Abstract

Evolutionary changes are changes in gene frequencies in a population over time. For these changes to be adaptive they must be caused by natural selection acting through differential survival or reproduction of individuals which differ in genotype. Changes in gene frequencies that cannot be related to changes in phenotype may illustrate that natural selection has operated and that (micro)evolutionary changes have taken place. They do not, however, help us to understand how evolution proceeds (changes in isoenzyme frequencies would fall into this category). The knowledge of population genetics unrelated to phenotype is thus not really sufficient to understand how evolution proceeds.

Keywords

Migration Europe Covariance Ornithol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergmans M (1983) Population biology of the harpacticoid copepod Tisbe furcata (Baird 1837). Thesis Vrije Univ BrusselGoogle Scholar
  2. Berthold P (in press) The control of migration in European warblers. Proc XIX Congr Int OrnitholGoogle Scholar
  3. Berthold P, Querner U (1981) Genetic basis of migratory behavior in European warblers. Science 212:82–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biebach H (1983) Genetic determination of partial migration in the European robin (Erithacus rubecula). Auk 100:601–606Google Scholar
  5. Dhondt AA (1982) Heritability of blue tit tarsus length from normal and cross-fostered broods. Evolution 36:418–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dhondt AA (1983) Variations in the number of overwintering stonechats possibly caused by natural selection. Ring Migrat 4:155–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhondt AA (1986) The effect of an extreme winter on per-capita growth rates in some resident bird populations: an example of r-selection? Biol J Linn Soc 28:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhondt AA, Eyckerman R (1980) Competition between the great tit and the blue tit outside the breeding season in field experiments. Ecology 61:1291–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhondt AA, Eyckerman R, Hublé J (1979) Will great tits become little tits? Biol J Linn Soc 11: 289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhondt AA, Schillemans J, De Laet J (1982) Blue tit territories in populations at different density levels. Ardea 70:185–188Google Scholar
  11. Garnett MC (1981) Body size, its heritability and influence on juvenile survival among great tits Parus major. Ibis 123:31 – 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Noordwijk AJ van (1980) On the genetical ecology of the great tit (Parus major). D Thesis Rijks- univ UtrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Dhondt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Antwerp, V.I.A.Antwerpen (Wilrijk)Belgium

Personalised recommendations