Partitioning Topological Spaces

  • William Weiss
Part of the Algorithms and Combinatorics book series (AC, volume 5)

Abstract

The study of partitions of topological spaces is a relatively new addition to Ramsey theory, but one which promises interesting things in the future. We partition topological spaces and hope to obtain a homogeneous set which is topologically relevant — for instance, a set homeomorphic to a well known topological space. We thus add something new to the ordinary partition calculus of set theory. We do, however, borrow the arrow notation. We write
$$X\, \to \,(Y)_\lambda ^n$$
to mean the following statement.

Keywords

Topo Alan ProoL 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumgartner, J.E. (1986): Partition relations for countable topological spaces. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 43, 178–195 [This includes Theorems 2.6, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 as well as other related information]MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bregman, Yu.Kh., Shapirovskii, B.E., Shostak, A.P. (1984): On partition of topological spaces. Cas. Pestovani Mat. 109, 27–53 [This is the proof of Theorem 2.23]MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Elekes, G., Erdos, P., Hajnal, A. (1978): On some partition properties of families of sets. Stud. Sci. Math. Hung. 13, 151–155 [This contains sketches of the proofs of Theorem 2.26 for regular cardinals and of Theorem 2.28, along with some related material]MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Friedman, H. (1974): On closed sets of ordinals. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 43, 190–192 [This contains a proof of Lemma 2.3 and some remarks concerning k → (top ω1)21]MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedman, H. (1975): One hundred and two problems in mathematical logic. J. Symb. Logic 40, 113–129 [ω2→ (top ω1)21 is problem number 72]MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hajnal, A., Juhász, I., Shelah, S. (1986): Splitting strongly almost disjoint families. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 295, 369–387 [This contains a synthesis of the proofs of Theorem 2.15 and Theorem 2.23 and gives connections to other combinatorial problems]MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Malyhin, V.I. (1979): On Ramsey spaces. Sov. Math., Dokl. 20, 894–898 [This has an independent proof of Corollary 2.16]MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Nešetřil, J., Rodl, V. (1977): Ramsey topological spaces. In: Novák, J. (ed.): General topology and its relations to modern analysis and algebra IV, Part B. Society of Czechoslovak Mathematicians and Physicists, Prague, pp. 333–337 [A successful attempt at popularizing Question 4.1]Google Scholar
  9. Nešetřil, J., Rödl, V. (1979): Partition theory and its application. In: Bollobás, B. (ed.): Surveys in combinatorics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 96–156 (Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser., Vol. 38) [Discussion of the project of extending Ramsey theory to topological spaces]Google Scholar
  10. Prikry, K., Solovay, R. (1975): On partitions into stationary sets. J. Symb. Logic 40, 75–80 [The proof that V=L implies that for all k, k \(\not \to \) (topω1)21]MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shelah, S. (1982): Proper forcing. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (Lect. Notes Math., Vol. 940) [This contains the proof of Theorem 2.12, Part (i)]MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Todorčevič, S. (1983): Forcing positive partition relations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 280, 703–720 [This contains the proof of Theorem 4.7, Part (i) explicitly and Part (ii) implicitly]MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Weiss, W. (1980): Partitioning topological spaces. In: Csaśzár, A. (ed.): Topology II. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1249–1255 (Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, Vol. 23) [This contains an incorrect proof of Theorem 2.15; unfortunately the correction didn’t reach the editors in time. I would like to thank V.I. Malyhin for pointing out the gap in that proof]Google Scholar
  14. Wolfsdorf, K. (1983): Färbungen großer Würfel mit bunten Wegen. Arch. Math, 40, 569–576 [Here it is pointed out that the proof of Theorem 2.15 can be slightly modified to partition into continuum-many pieces]MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Weiss

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations