Summary
The aim of this study was to clarify indications for different types of anastomoses in different clinical situations. In 656 patients who underwent aortobifemoral graft implantation the following examinations were performed: angiography, intraoperative blood-flow measurement, the evaluation of back-flow pressure from femoral arteries, the general assessment of intraoperative conditions. According to the result of the examinations mentioned above, different types of anastomoses were done. It can be concluded that aortobifemoral graft implantation should not be a mutinously performed operation, but in choosing the most suitable type of anastomoses many factors should be carefuly analyzed.
Zusammenfassung
Das Ziel dieser Studie war die Darlegung der Indikation für verschiedene Anastomo-sentypen bei unterschiedlichen klinischen Situationen. Bei 656 Patienten, bei denen eine aortobifemorale Prothesenimplantation vorgenommen wurde, wurden folgende Untersuchungen durchgeführt: Angiographie, intraoperative Flußmessung, Beurteilung des Rückflusses aus den Femoralarterien und eine generelle Bewertung der intraoperativen Bedingungen. In Abhängigkeit des Ergebnisses dieser Untersuchungen wurden unterschiedliche Anastomosentypen verwendet. Daraus kann der Schluß gezogen werden, daß die Implantation aortobifemoraler Prothesen nicht als Routinemaßnahme vorgenommen werden sollte, sondern der geeignetste Anasto-mosentyp sollte aufgrund einer sorgfältigen Analyse gewählt werden.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becquemin JP, Malliere D, Benhaiem N (1987) Late occlusion of aortobifemoral grafts. Causes and management. J Cardiovasc Surg 28: 12
Brewster DC, Darling RC (1978) Optimal methods of aortoiliac reconstruction. Surgery 83:739
Brewster DC, Perler BA, Robinson JG, Darling RC (1982) Aortofemoral graft for multilevel occlusive disease. Predictors for success and need for distal bypass. Arch Surg 117: 1593
Crawford ES, Bomberg RA, Glasser DH et al. (1981) Aortoiliac occlusive disease: factors influencing survival and function following reconstructive operation over a twenty-five-year period. Surgery 90: 1055
Jarret F (1985) Vascular surgery of the lower extremity. CV Mosby Co St Louis
Malone JM, Goldstone J, Moore WS (1978) Autogenous profundaplasty: the key to long-term patency in secondary repair or aortofemoral graft occlusion. Ann Surg 88: 817
Nevelsteen A, Suy R, Daenen W, Boel A, Stalpaert G (1980) Aortofemoral grafting: factors influencing late results. Surgery 88: 642
Oely K (1985) Early complication following aortoiliac reconstruction. Helv Chir Acta 51: 793
Pearce W, Kempczinski RF (1984) Extended autogenous profundoplasty and aortofemoral grafting: an alternative to synchronous distal bypass. J Vasc Surg 1: 455
Pierce GE et al. (1982) Evaluation of end-to-end versus end-to-side proximal anastomosis in aortobifemoral bypass. Arch Surg 117: 1580
Rutherford RB, Jones DM, Martin MS et al. (1986) Serial hemodynamic assessment of aortobifemoral bypass. J Vasc Surg 4: 428
Strandness DE, Sumner DS (1975) Hemodynamics for surgeons. Grune and Stratton Inc New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ruciński, A. et al. (1992). Chosing the kind of anastomoses in aortobifemoral graft. In: Hepp, W. (eds) Aortoiliakale Verschlußprozesse. Berliner Gefäßchirurgische Reihe, vol 4. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72484-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72484-8_3
Publisher Name: Steinkopff
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72485-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72484-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive