Skip to main content

Survival of aortic allografts containing living cells

  • Conference paper
Book cover Cardiac Valve Allografts 1962–1987

Abstract

There is agreement among investigators that the “in vivo reaction” to the implanted allograft is complex and variably related to (1) donor age; (2) procurement and processing methods; (3) implantation position and technique; and (4) immunogenic reaction within the valve cusps (1, 2, 3). Many human and animal experiments have been performed to determine the nature of the donor and host reaction after implantation, and there is disagreement as to whether the transplanted donor cells remain viable. Our findings, as well as O’Brien’s remain opposed to those of Brian Barrett-Boyes and Ross on this issue (4, 5, 6, 7). We believe that donor cells remain viable for extended periods, and that long-term valve function is related to the presence of viable cells in the donor graft (Fig. 1). If viable donor cells are not present, then long-term function is secondary to the basic tissue integrity of the functional valve cusp and not due to repopulation by host cells. It is proven that viable fibroblasts in valve cusps can be detected histologically and by tissue culture after ex-plantation. Our data suggests that these are living donor fibroblasts, and there is limited host invasion into and onto the functional valve cusps after implantation (5, 8, 9). Morphology of both experimental and clinical valve expiants indicate that donor cell hyperplasia and host overgrowth or pannus can be advantageous or deleterious depending upon the location and intensity of collagen deposition (Fig. 2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barratt-Boyes BG (1979) Cardiothoracic surgery in the antipodes: including a report of a randomized trial of medical and surgical treatment of asymptomatic patients with severe coronary artery disease; a long-term follow-up of both fresh and antibiotic-treated homograft valves; and some observations on glutaraldehyde-preserved valve tissue. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78 (6): 804–822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodnar E, Wain WH, Martelli V, Ross DN (1979) Long-term performance of 580 homograft and autograft valves used for aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 27 (1): 31–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buch WS, Kosek JC, Angell WW (1971) The role of rejection and mechanical trauma on valve graft viability. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62: 423

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barratt-Boyes BG, Roche AH, Subramanyan R, Pemberton JR, Whitlock RM (1987) Long-term follow-up of patients with the antibiotic-sterilized aortic homograft valve inserted freehand in the aortic position. Circulation 75 (4): 768–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Angeli WW, Pillsbury RC, Shumway NE (1969) Storage and function of the canine aortic homo-graft. Arch Surg 99: 92

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien MF, Stafford EG, Gardner MAH, Pohlner PG, McGiffin DC. A comparison of aortic valve replacement with viable cryopreserved and fresh allograft valves with a note on chromosomal studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, in press

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khanna SK, Ross JK, Monro JL (1981) Homograft aortic valve replacement; seven years’ experience with antibiotic-treated valves. Thorax 36 (5): 330–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kosek JC, Iben AB, Shumway NE, Angell WW (1969) Morphology of fresh heart valve homo-grafts. Surg 66: 269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Angeli WW, Buch WS, Shumway NE (1972) The viable aortic homograft. In: Ionescu MI (ed) Biologial tissue in heart valve replacement. London, Butterworth and Co., p 383

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kay PH, Ross DN (1985) Fifteen years’ experience with the aortic homograft: the conduit of choice for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 40 (4): 360–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt

About this paper

Cite this paper

Angell, W.W., Oury, J.H., Koziol, J.A., Dussault, M.H. (1988). Survival of aortic allografts containing living cells. In: Yankah, A.C., Hetzer, R., Miller, D.C., Ross, D., Somerville, J., Yacoub, M.H. (eds) Cardiac Valve Allografts 1962–1987. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72420-6_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72420-6_41

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72422-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72420-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics