Cardiac Pacing pp 585-589 | Cite as

Long-Term Endocardial Pacing in Children With Postoperative Bradycardia-Tachycardia Syndrome Following the Senning, Mustard and Fontan Operations

  • James D. Maloney
  • Lon W. Castle
  • Robert J. EastwayJr.
  • Richard Sterba
  • Douglas S. Moodie
  • Carl C. Gill
  • Michael D. McGoon
Conference paper

Summary

Permanent pacing in children, including those with postoperative bradycardiatachycardia syndrome (BTS), remains compromised by devices, lead-electrode systems and implantation technics designed for the adult. Althogh recent technology and simplified implantation technics have reduced many of these barriers, children with congenital anomalies and intra-atrial cardiac operations are particularly prone to postoperative BTS and require special approaches to pacemaker therapy.

This report describes the use of endocardial atrial demand pacing, with antitachycardial burst pacing capabilities (either automatic or parent activated) in the treatment of three children following Mustard repair, one following a Fontan repair, and two following Senning operations. Ages ranged from 3 to 11 years. All had life threatening bradycardias and incapacitating tachyarrhythmias documented clinically. Devices utilized included the Intermedics 262-01 (Cybertach 60) in one patient, and the Medtronic 5984 (Spectrax SX) in five patients. Atrial endocardial pacing was accomplished using the subclavian venipuncture technique and active fixation endocardial leads.

This experience, with a follow-up of 3 to 24 months, suggests that atrial endocardial pacing in children with postoperative BTS and normal A-V nodal function reliably controls symptomatic bradycardia, restores A-V synchrony, appears to decrease the frequency of intra-atrial tachycardia, and with concurrent antiarrhythmic agents provides a means of safe, effective control or termination of tachycardia.

Keywords

Catheter Dilantin Sino 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I. McGoon MD, Maloney JD, McGoon DC, Danielson GK: Lont term endocardial atrial pacing in children with postoperative bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome and limited ventricular access. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 1750–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenwood RD, Rosenthal A, Sloss LJ, LaCorte M, Nadas AS: Sick sinus syndrome after surgery for congenital heart disease. Circulation 1975; 52: 208–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nissen RG, Holmes DR, Maloney JD, Feldt RH, Danielson GK: Experience with permanent cardiac pacemaker in congenital heart disease. In: Meere C, ed Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Cardiac Pacing, Montreal, Canada. Pace Symp Oct 1979; 2–5: chap 23–1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maloney JD, Berkovits BU: Hemodynamic and antitachycardia value of dual chamber pacing: initial and followup assessment. Second European Symposium on Cardiac Pacing, May 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maloney JD, Medina-Ravell V, Pierett OH, Portillo B, Maduro C, Castellanos A, Berkovits B: Followup assessment of dual-demand, dual-chamber DVI-DVO pacing for automatic conversion, control and prevention of refractory paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, Second European Symposium on Cardiac Pacing, May 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Maloney
  • Lon W. Castle
    • 1
  • Robert J. EastwayJr.
  • Richard Sterba
  • Douglas S. Moodie
  • Carl C. Gill
  • Michael D. McGoon
  1. 1.Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations