Advertisement

Comparison of Cemented and Cementless Ankle Arthroplasty

  • H. Kofoed

Abstract

Cementless ankle arthroplasty has been used within the last decade. There are no reports to say whether this procedure would give better results than prosthesis fixed with cement. It has been claimed that cementless use of prosthesis would not change their fate [1]. While waiting for the Scan dinavian total ankle replacement (STAR) prosthesis to become cementless (hydroxy-apatite coated), it was first used with cement fixation, from 1986 to 1989. Since 1990, the prosthesis has been used in the cementless version. All patients are in a prospective series with yearly follow-ups. This gives an opportunity to test whether the cementless fixation gives better results or not.

Keywords

Tibial Component Prospective Series Matoid Arthritis Talus Dome Cement Fixation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hamble. DL (1985) Can the ankle joint be replaced? (editorial) J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:689–690Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kofoed H (1995) Cylindrical cemented ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 16:474–479Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Kofoed

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations