Volumetric Analysis of Spiral CT Data

  • G. D. Rubin
Conference paper


The quality of multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional renderings is primarily influenced by the quality of the computed tomography (CT) data. A thorough understanding of spiral CT principles is required for optimal creation of multiplanar and three-dimensional renderings. No amount of sophisticated rendering and image segmentation can resurrect a poor acquisition.


Spiral Compute Tomography Volume Rendering Volumetric Analysis Lighting Effect Multiplanar Reformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR et al (1991) Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology 181: 321–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Totty WG, Vannier MW (1984) Complex musculoskeletal anatomy: analysis using three dimensional surface reconstruction. Radiology 150:173–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cline HE, Lorensen WE, Souza SP et al (1991) 3D Surface rendered MR images of the brain and its vasculature. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:344–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Magnusson M, Lenz R, Danielsson PE (1991) Evaluation of methods for shaded surface display of CT volumes. Comput Med Imaging Graph 15:247–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dillon EH, van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA et al (1993) Spiral CT angiography. AJR 160: 1273–1278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Napel S, Marks MP, Rubin GD et al (1992) CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology 185:607–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keller PJ, Drayer BP, Fram EK et al (1989) MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Radiology 173:527–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laub GA (1988) MR angiography with gradient motion refocusing. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12:377–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cline HE, Dumoulin CL, Hart HRJ et al (1987) 3D reconstruction of the brain from magnetic resonance images using a connectivity algorithm. Magn Reson Imaging 5:345–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ney DR, Fishman EK, Niederhuber JE (1992) Three-dimensional display of hepatic venous anatomy generated from spiral computed tomography data: preliminary experience. J Digit Imaging 5:242–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson PT, Heath DG, Bliss DF et al (1996) Three-dimensional CT: real-time interactive volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:581–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Bliss DF et al (1996) Skeletal 3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering. Skeletal Radiol 25:207–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V et al (1996) Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology 199:321–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vining DJ, Shifrin RY, Haponik EF et al (1994) Virtual bronchoscopy. Radiology 193(P):261Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rubin GD, Dake MD, Semba CS (1995) Current status of 3-D spiral CT for imaging the vasculature. Radiol Clin N Am 33:51–70PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. D. Rubin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations