Summary
All successful economic reforms start with a major stabilization effort. The basic monetary and fiscal theory of high inflation and sharp stabilization seems to apply more generally (budget deficits and money creation must be brought under control) and, to the extent that differences exist between groups of countries, these stem from problems in the ability to control the budget or the amount of credit or wage policy. The general lesson to be learned is that often macroeconomic adjustment cannot be achieved without at least some simultaneous structural reform and that the policy reform package has to place even greater emphasis on setting up institutions and rules of behaviour for the micro units. In order to diminish the costs of the reforms, the optimal sequencing of the reform measures is desirable. Countries that have experienced protracted high inflation need to achieve not only fiscal reconstruction by thorough budget balancing but also a far reaching institutional reconstruction that involves a financial system capable of providing efficient intermediation and a regulatory and trade regime that helps allocate resources in ways that maximize productivity. The efficacy of the financial system is a key determinant of the success of any economic transformation process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barro, R. and D. Gordon, (1983), “A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in NaturalRate Model”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.91.
Bofinger, P., (1990), “The Role of Monetary Policy in the Process of Economic Reform in Eastern Europe”, Discussion Paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Buch, C., (1995), “Monetary Policy and the Transformation of the Banking System in Eastern Europe”, Working Paper, The Kiel Institute of World Economics.
Calvo, G., (1989), “Incredible Reforms”, IMF Staff Papers.
Dornbusch, R., (1990), “Policies to Move from Stabilization to Growth”, Discussion Paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Dornbusch, R., (1990), “Credibility and Stabilization”, Discussion Paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Edwards, S., (1992), “The Sequencing of Structural Adjustment and Stabilization”, Working Paper, International Centre for Economic Growth, San Francisco.
Edwards, S., (1989), Exchange Rate Misalignment in Developing Countries, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
Portes, R., (1991), “The Path of Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: An Introduction”, Discussion Paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Roland, G., (1994), “On the Speed and Sequencing of Privatization and restructuring”, Discussion Paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Sachs, J., (1986), “The Bolivian Hyperinflation and Stabilization”, N.B.E.R. Working Paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pitic, G. (1998). Macroeconomic Stability and How to Avoid the Frequent Use of Stabilization Therapies. In: Baltas, N.C., Demopoulos, G., Hassid, J. (eds) Economic Interdependence and Cooperation in Europe. Studies in International Economics and Institutions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72111-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72111-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72113-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72111-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive