Advertisement

Molecular Mechanisms of Persistent Infection by Reovirus

  • T. S. Dermody
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 233/2)

Abstract

Many cytolytic animal viruses are capable of establishing persistent infections of cultured cells. For such persistent infections to be maintained interactions between virus and cell must be modulated such that a less cytopathic virus-host relationship is established (reviewed in Ahmed et al. 1996). Variant viruses may be selected that are attenuated in cytolytic potential, or variant cells may be selected that are less permissive for viral replication. In some cases, however, viruses and cells coevolve during persistent infection, such that selection of virus-resistant cells leads to counterselection of highly infective mutant viruses that can grow in resistant cells.

Keywords

Persistent Infection Ammonium Chloride Viral Entry Semliki Forest Virus Reovirus Infection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed R, Fields BN (1982) Role of the S4 gene in the establishment of persistent reovirus infection in L cells. Cell 28: 605–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed R, Graham AF (1977) Persistent infections in L cells with temperature-sensitive mutants of reovirus. J Virol 23: 250–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed R, Chakraborty PR, Graham AF, Ramig RF, Fields BN (1980) Genetic variation during persistent reovirus infection: presence of extragenically suppressed temperature-sensitive lesions in wild-type virus isolated from persistently infected L cells. J Virol 34: 383–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed R, Canning WM, Kauffman RS, Sharpe AH, Hallum JV, Fields BN (1981) Role of the host cell in persistent viral infection: coevolution of L cells and reovirus during persistent infection. Cell 25: 325–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmed R, Kauffman RS, Fields BN (1983) Genetic variation during persistent reovirus infection: isolation of cold-sensitive and temperature-sensitive mutants from persistently infected L cells. Virology 131: 71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed R, Morrison LA, Knipe DM (1996) Persistence of viruses. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds) Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 219–249Google Scholar
  7. Allison SL, Schalich J, Stiansy K, Mandl CW, Kunz C, Heinz FX (1995) Oligomeric rearrangement of tick-borne encephalitis virus envelope proteins induced by an acidic pH. J Virol 69: 695–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baer GS, Dermody TS (1997) Mutations in reovirus outer-capsid protein cs3 selected during persistent infections of L cells confer resistance to protease inhibitor E64. J Virol 71: 4921–4928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrett AJ, Kembhavi AA, Brown MA, Kirschke H, Knight CG, Tamai M, Hanada K (1982) L-transEpoxysuccinyl-leucylamido(4-guanidino)butane (E-64) and its analogues as inhibitors of cysteine proteinases including cathepsins B, H and L. Biochem J 201: 189–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bass DM, Bodkin D, Dambrauskas R, Trier JS, Fields BN, Wolf JL (1990) Intraluminal proteolytic activation plays an important role in replication of type 1 reovirus in the intestines of neonatal mice. J Virol 64: 1830–1833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bassel-Duby R, Nibert M, Homcy C, Fields B, Sawutz D (1987) Evidence that the sigma 1 protein of reovirus serotype 3 is a multimer. J Virol 61: 1834–1841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell TM, Massie A, Ross MGR (1966) Further isolation of reovirus type 3 from cases of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Br Med J 2: 1514–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bodkin DK, Nibert ML, Fields BN (1989) Proteolytic digestion of reovirus in the intestinal lumens of neonatal mice. J Virol 63: 4676–4681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Borsa J, Morash BD, Sargent MD, Copps TP, Lievaart PA, Szekely JG (1979) Two modes of entry of reovirus particles into L cells. J Gen Virol 45: 161–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borsa J, Sargent MD, Lievaart PA, Copps TP (1981) Reovirus: evidence for a second step in the intracellular uncoating and transcriptase activation process. Virology 111: 191–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borzakian S, Couderc T, Barbier Y, Attal G, Pelletier I, Colbere-Garapin F (1992) Persistent poliovirus infection: establishment and maintenance involve distinct mechanisms. Virology 186: 398–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown EG, Nibert ML, Fields BN (1983) The L2 gene of reovirus serotype 3 controls the capacity to interfere, accumulate deletions and establish persistent infection. In: Compans RW, Bishop DHL (eds) Double-stranded RNA viruses. Elsevier Biomedical, New York, pp 275–287Google Scholar
  18. Bullough PA, Hughson FM, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC (1994) Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion. Nature 371: 37–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Canning WM, Fields BN (1983) Ammonium chloride prevents lytic growth of reovirus and helps to establish persistent infection in mouse L cells. Science 219: 987–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang CT, Zweerink HJ (1971) Fate of parental reovirus in infected cell. Virology 46: 544–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen W, Baric RS (1996) Molecular anatomy of mouse hepatitis virus persistence: coevolution of increased host cell resistance and virus virulence. J Virol 70: 3947–3960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cleveland DR, Zarbl H, Millward S (1986) Reovirus guanyltransferase is L2 gene product lambda 2. J Virol 60: 307–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Danis C, Mabrouk T, Garzon S, Lemay G (1993) Establishment of persistent reovirus infection in SC1 cells: absence of protein synthesis inhibition and increased level of double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase. Virus Res 2727: 253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dermody TS, Nibert ML, Wetzel JD, Tong X, Fields BN (1993) Cells and viruses with mutations affecting viral entry are selected during persistent infections of L cells with mammalian reoviruses. J Virol 67: 2055–2063PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dermody TS, Chappell JD, Hofler JG, Kramp W, Tyler KL (1995) Eradication of persistent reovirus infection from a B-cell hybridoma. Virology 212: 272–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dryden KA, Wang G, Yeager M, Nibert ML, Coombs KM, Furlong DB, Fields BN, Baker TS (1993) Early steps in reovirus infection are associated with dramatic changes in supramolecular structure and protein conformation: analysis of virions and subviral particles by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction. J Cell Biol 122: 1023–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duncan MR, Stanish SM, Cox DC (1978) Differential sensitivity of normal and transformed human cells to reovirus infection. J Virol 28: 444–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fenner F, Kerr PJ (1994) Evolution of the poxviruses, including the coevolution of virus and host in myxomatosis In: Morse SS (ed) The evoluticmary biology of viruses. Raven, New York, pp 273–292Google Scholar
  29. Fraser RD, Furlong DB, Trus BL, Nibert ML, Fields BN, Steven AC (1990) Molecular structure of the cell-attachment protein of reovirus: correlation of computer-processed electron micrographs with sequence-based predictions. J Virol 64: 2990–3000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Furlong DB, Nibert ML, Fields BN (1988) Sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles. J Virol 62: 246–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gallagher TM, Escarmis C, Buchmeier MJ (1991) Alteration of the pH dependence of coronavirusinduced cell fusion: effect of mutations in the spike glycoprotein. J Virol 65: 1916–1928PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Haller BL, Barkon ML, Li X-Y, Hu WM, Wetzel JD, Dermody TS, Virgin HW (1995) Brain-and intestine-specific variants of reovirus serotype 3 strain Dearing are selected during chronic infection of severe combined immunodeficient mice. J Virol 69: 3933–3937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan G, Levy A, Racaniello VR (1989) Isolation and characterization of HeLa cell lines blocked at different steps in the poliovirus life cycle. J Virol 63: 43–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kauffman RS, Ahmed R, Fields BN (1983) Selection of a mutant SI gene during reovirus persistent infection of L cells: role in maintenance of the persistent state. Virology 131: 79–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kielian MC, Helenius A (1985) pH-induced alterations in the fusogenic spike protein of Semliki Forest virus. J Cell Biol 101:2284–2291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee PW, Hayes EC, Joklik WK (1981) Protein sigma 1 is the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology 108: 156–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leone G, Duncan R, Lee PWK (199la) Trimerization of the reovirus cell attachment protein (al) induces conformational changes in al necessary for its cell-binding function. Virology 184:758–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leone G, Duncan R, Mah DC, Price A, Cashdollar LW, Lee PW (199lb) The N-terminal heptad repeat region of reovirus cell attachment protein al is responsible for al oligomer stability and possesses intrinsic oligomerization function. Virology 182:336–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leone G, Maybaum L, Lee PWK (1992) The reovirus cell attachment protein possesses two independently active trimerization domains: basis of dominant negative effects. Cell 71: 479–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levy JA, Henle G, Henle W, Zajac BA (1968) Effect of reovirus type 3 on cultured Burkitt’s tumour cells. Nature 220: 607–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahy BWJ (1985) Strategies of viral persistence. Br Med Bull 41: 50–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Martinez CG, Guinea R, Benavente J, Carrasco L (1996) The entry of reovirus into L cells is dependent on vacuolar proton-ATPase activity. J Virol 70: 576–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Matsuzaki N, Hinshaw VS, Fields BN, Greene MI (1986) Cell receptors for the mammalian reovirus: reovirus-specific T-cell hybridomas can become persistently infected and undergo autoimmune stimulation. J Virol 60: 259–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Merion ML, Schlesinger P, Brooks RM, Moehring JM, Moehring TJ, Sly WS (1983) Defective acidification of endosomes in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants cross-resistant to toxins and viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 5315–5319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller JE, Samuel CE (1992) Proteolytic cleavage of the reovirus sigma 3 protein results in enhanced double-stranded RNA-binding activity: identification of a repeated basic amino acid motif within the C-terminal binding region. J Virol 66: 5347–5356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Montgomery LB, Kao CYY, Verdin EM, Cahill C, Maratos-Flier E (1991) Infection of a polarized epithelial cell line with wild-type reovirus leads to virus persistence and altered cellular function. J Gen Virol 72: 2939–2946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morrison LA, Fields BN, Dermody TS (1993) Prolonged replication in the mouse central nervous system of type 3 reoviruses isolated from persistently infected L-cell cultures. J Virol 67: 3019–3026PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mrukowicz J, Wetzel JD, Goral MI, Fogo AB, Wright PF, Dermody TS (1997) Viruses and cells with mutations affecting viral entry are selected during persistent rotavirus infections of MA104 cells. J Virol 72 (in press)Google Scholar
  49. Nibert ML, Dermody TS, Fields BN (1990) Structure of the reovirus cell-attachment protein: a model for the domain organization of al. J Virol 64: 2976–2989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nibert ML, Chappell JD, Dermody TS (1995) Infectious subvirion particles of reovirus type 3 Dearing exhibit a loss in infectivity and contain a cleaved a1 protein. J Virol 69: 5057–5067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nibert ML, Schiff LA, Fields BN (1996) Reoviruses and their replication. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds) Fields virology, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1557–1596Google Scholar
  52. Ralph SJ, Harvey JD, Bellamy AR (1980) Subunit structure of the reovirus spike. J Virol 36: 894–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rubin DH, Weiner DB, Dworkin C, Greene MI, Maul GG, Williams WV (1992) Receptor utilization by reovirus type 3: distinct binding sites on thymoma and fibroblast cell lines result in differential compartmentalization of virions. Microb Pathog 12: 351–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schiff LA, Nibert ML, Co MS, Brown EG, Fields BN (1988) Distinct binding sites for zinc and double-stranded RNA in the reovirus outer capsid protein sigma 3. Mol Cell Biol 8: 273–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharpe AH, Fields BN (1983) Pathogenesis of reovirus infection. In: Joklik WK (eds) The reoviridae. Plenum, New York, pp 229–285Google Scholar
  56. Shepard DA, Ehnstrom JG, Schiff LA (1995) Association of reovirus outer capsid proteins a3 and p1 causes a conformational change that renders a3 protease sensitive. J Virol 69: 8180–8184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Silverstein SC, Astell C, Levin DH, Schonberg M, Acs G (1972) The mechanism of reovirus uncoating and gene activation in vivo. Virology 47: 797–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith RE, Zweerink HJ, Joklik WK (1969) Polypeptide components of virions, top component and cores of reovirus type 3. Virology 39: 791–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Strong JE, Leone G, Duncan R, Sharma RK, Lee PW (1991) Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the reovirus cell attachment protein sigma 1: evidence that it is a homotrimer. Virology 184: 23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sturzenbecker LJ, Nibert M, Furlong D, Fields BN (1987) Intracellular digestion of reovirus particles requires a low pH and is an essential step in the viral infectious cycle. J Virol 61: 2351–2361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Taber R, Alexander V, Whitford W (1976) Persistent reovirus infection of CHO cells resulting in virus resistance. J Virol 17: 513–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Verdin EM, Maratos-Flier E, Carpentier JL, Kahn CR (1986) Persistent infection with a nontransforming RNA virus leads to impaired growth factor receptors and response. J Cell Physiol 128:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wahlberg JM, Bron R, Wischut J, Garoff H (1992) Membrane fusion of Semliki Forest virus involves homotrimers of the fusion protein. J Virol 66: 7309–7318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Weiner HL, Ault KA, Fields BN (1980) Interaction of reovirus with cell surface receptors. I. Murine and human lymphocytes have a receptor for the hemagglutinin of reovirus type 3. J Immunol 124:2143–2148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wetzel JD, Chappell JD, Fogo AB, Dermody TS (1997a) Efficiency of viral entry determines the capacity of murine erythroleukemia cells to support persistent infections by mammalian reoviruses. J Virol 71: 299–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wetzel JD, Wilson GJ, Baer GS, Dunnigan LR, Wright JP, Tang DSH, Dermody TS (1997b) Reovirus variants selected during persistent infections of L cells contain mutations in the viral SI and S4 genes and are altered in viral disassembly. J Virol 71: 1362–1369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Whitton JL, Oldstone MBA (1996) Immune responses to viruses. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds) Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 345–374Google Scholar
  68. Wilson GJ, Wetzel JD, Puryear W, Bassel-Duby R, Dermody TS (1996) Persistent reovirus infections of L cells select mutations in viral attachment protein 61 that alter oligomer stability. J Virol 70: 6598–6606PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. S. Dermody
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Pediatrics, and Microbiology and Immunology, and Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric ResearchVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations