Abstract
The logit-log method (Rodbard and Lewald 1970) remains the most popular method for RIA data reduction in use today (Fig. 1). It has the virtue of simplicity (Rodbard 1979). The method can be implemented graphically, using special logit-log graph paper. It can be implemented using a small programmable handheld calculator or computer (Davis et al. 1980). Even the smallest microcomputers can easily perform this method with proper weighting and detailed statistical analysis. A weighted linear regression can even be performed by special “macro” programs for popular spreadsheet programs. The logit-log method has been incorporated into numerous commercial systems (β- and γ-counters). When the logit-log method “works” (which is probably about 90%–95% of the time) everything is fine. Unfortunately, in about 5%–10% of assays, the logit-log method fails to provide an adequate description of the RIA dose-response curve. What should the assayist do when the logit-log method fails? Since numerous alternatives are available, each with its own advantages and limitations, the assayist is often faced with a bewildering situation (Rodbard 1979). Are we to try all possible methods, using a trial-and-error approach? When will we be able to say that we have a “good” method, an “adequate” or “optimal” method? Is there a systematic approach? Are we to be restricted to the curve-fitting methods implemented in commercial, turnkey, “black box” approaches to data analysis? This chapter will attempt to provide a simple, rational approach to the question, “what should I do when the logit-log method fails?”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bard Y (1974) Nonlinear parameter estimation. Academic, New York
Bennett CA, Franklin NL (1954) Statistical analysis in chemistry and the chemical industry. Wiley, New York
Davis SE, Jaffe ML, Munson PJ, Rodbard D (1980) Radioimmunoassay data processing with a small programmable calculator. J Immunoassay. 1 (1): 15–25
DeLean A, Munson PJ, Rodbard D (1978) Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: applications to bioassay, radioligand assay and physiological dose-response curves. Am J Physiol. 235: E97–E102
Draper NR, Smith H (1966) Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New York
Ehrlich PH, Moyle WR (1983) Cooperative immunoassays: ultrasensitive assays with mixed monoclonal antibodies. Science. 221: 279–281
Feldman HA, Rodbard D (1971) Mathematical theory of radioimmunoassay. In: Odell WD, Daughaday WH (eds) Competitive protein binding assays. Lippincott, Philadelphia, chap 7, pp 158–203
Finney DJ (1983) Response curves for radioimmunoassay. Clin Chem 29: 1762–1766
Guardabasso V, Rodbard D, Munson PJ (1987) A model-free approach to estimation of relative potency in dose-response curve analysis. Am J Physiol: Endocrinology and Metabolism 252 (15): E357–E364
Magar ME (1972) Data analysis in biochemistry and biophysics. Academic, New York Mcintosh JEA (1984) Overview of mathematical modeling with computers in endocrinology. In: Rodbard D, Forti G (eds) Computers in endocrinology. Raven, New York, p 37
Mcintosh JEA (1984) Overview of mathematical modeling with computers in endocrinology. In: Rodbard D, Forti G (eds) Computers in endocrinology. Raven, New York, p 37
Munson PJ, Rodbard D (1980) Ligand: characterization of ligand binding systems: a versatile computerized approach. Anal Biochem. 107: 220–239
Munson PJ, Rodbard D (1984) Computerized analysis of ligand binding data: basic principles and recent developments. In: Rodbard D, Forti G (eds) Computers in endocrinology. Raven, New York, pp 117–145
Prentice RL (1976) A generalization of the probit and logit methods for dose-response curves. Biometrics. 32: 761–768
Raab GM (1983) Comparison of a logistic and a mass-action curve for radioimmunoassay. Clin Chem. 29: 1757–1761
Rodbard D (1974) Statistical quality control and routine data processing for radioimmu-noassays (RIA) and immunoradiometric assays (IRMA). Clin Chem. 20: 1255–1270
Rodbard D (1979) Dose interpolation for radioimmunoassays: an overview. In: Natelson S, Pesce AJ, Dietz AA (eds) Clinical immunochemistry, chemical and cellular bases and applications in disease, vol 3. American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Washington, DC, pp 477–494
Rodbard D (1980) Mathematics and statistics of immunoassay. In: Langan J (ed) Proceedings of a symposium on the use of non-isotopic methods in immunoassay. Masson, New York, chap 3, pp 45–101
Rodbard D (1984) Lessons from the computerization of radioimmunoassays: an introduction to the basic principles of modeling. In: Rodbard D, Forti G (eds) Computers in endocrinology. Raven, New York, pp 75–99
Rodbard D, Hutt DM (1974) Statistical analysis of radioimmunoassays and immunoradio¬metric (labeled antibody assays: a generalized, weighted, iterative least squares method for logistic curve fitting. In: Proceedings, symposium on radioimmunoassay and related procedures in medicine. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 165–192 ( Unipub, New York )
Rodbard D, Lewald JE (1970) Computer analysis of radio-ligand assay and radioimmunoassay data. Karolinsky symposia, research methods reproductive endocrinology, Geneva, March 1970. Acta Endocr. 64, Suppl 147: 79–103
Rodbard D, Tacey RL (1978) Radioimmunoassay dose interpolation based on the mass action law with antibody heterogeneity. Anal Biochem. 90: 13–21
Rodbard D, Munson PJ, DeLean A ( 1978 a) Improved curve-fitting, parallelism testing, characterization of sensitivity and specificity, validation, and optimization for radioligand assays. In: Radioimmunoassay and related procedures in medicine. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, vol 1, pp 496–504 ( Unipub, New York )
Rodbard D, Feldman Y, Jaffe ML, Miles LEM (1978 b) Kinetics of two-site immunoradiometric (“sandwich”) assays. II. Studies on the nature of the “high dose hook effect.” Immunochemistry. 15: 77–82
Rodbard D, Munson PJ, Thakur AK (1980) Quantitative characterization of hormone receptors. Cancer. 46 (12): 2907–2918
Rodbard D, Cole BR, Munson PJ (1983) Development of a friendly, self-teaching, inter-active statistical package for analysis of clinical research data: the Bright Stat- Pack. In: Dayhoff RE (ed) Proceedings of the seventh annual symposium on computers in medical care. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring, MD, pp 701–704
Rodbard D, Foy J, Munson P, Zweig M, Lewis T (1985) A personal-computer-based system for acquisition and analysis of radioimmunoassay data. Proceedings, symposium on computer applications in medical care. IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD, pp 455–459
Wilkins TA, Chadney DC, Bryant J, Palmstrom SH, Winder RL (1978) Nonlinear least- squares curve-fitting of a simple theoretical model to radioimmunoassay dose-response data using a minicomputer. In: Radioimmunoassay and related procedures in medicine, vol 1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 399–423 ( Unipub, New York )
Wold S (1974) Spline function in data analysis. Technometrics 16: 1–11
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodbard, D., Guardabasso, V., Munson, P.J. (1987). Statistical Aspects of Radioimmunoassay. In: Patrono, C., Peskar, B.A. (eds) Radioimmunoassay in Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 82. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71809-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71809-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-71811-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-71809-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive