Species Differences in Enzymes Controlling Reactive Epoxides

  • H. R. Glatt
  • F. Oesch
Part of the Archives of Toxicology book series (TOXICOLOGY, volume 10)

Abstract

Activities of enzymes involved in the metabolic formation and catabolism of epoxides were determined in liver subcellular preparations from 11 mammalian species and various strains of mice. The most conspicuous finding was that the activities of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase were clearly lower in the mouse than in the other species. This invited the working hypothesis that epoxides may be involved in mouse liver carcinogenesis. The carcinogens may be metabolised themselves to reactive epoxides or they may modify the metabolism of epoxides formed from endogenous or other foreign compounds. To examine the former point, phenobarbital, DDT (1,1-bis(p- chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethane), lindane and benzo(a)pyrene were investigated for mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium using as the carcinogen-metabolising system subcellular liver preparations from animals in which these compounds efficiently induce liver tumours and from resistant animals. Phenobarbital, DDT and lindane were not mutagenic under any conditions, including those where microsomal epoxide hydrolase was also inhibited. However, a DDT metabolite, 1,1-bis(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane was mutagenic in strain TA98, when norharman was added to the metabolising system, rat liver postmitochondrial fraction. Benzo(a)pyrene, which efficiently induces liver tumours in male but not in female newborn C3HeB/ FeJ × A/J mice, was similarly activated by liver preparations from male and female animals. This was true with and without pretreatment of the mice with an inducer of cytochrome P-448. Also, activities and inducibilities of mono-oxygenase, epoxide hydrolase and glutathione transferase (toward benzo-(a)pyrene and benzo(a)pyrene 4,5-oxide, respectively) were indistinguishable between males and females. Therefore, differences in the metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene do not appear to be the reason for the sex difference in tumour susceptibility. Likewise, mouse strains with high and low frequencies of spontaneous and chemically-induced liver tumours did not appreciably differ in their hepatic microsomal epoxide hydrolase activities. The low level of this activity therefore cannot constitute the critical factor for the high tumour susceptibility of certain strains of mice. However the statement does not preclude potentiation of the susceptibility toward particular carcinogens owing to this metabolic trait of the mouse.

Key words

Benzo(a)pyrene Co-mutagenicity DDD DDT Detoxification Epoxide hydrolase Lindane Liver tumours Norharman Phenobarbital Tumour susceptibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 31: 347–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bindel U, Sparrow A, Schmassmann HU, Golan M, Bentley P, Oesch F (1979) Endogenous role of epoxide hydratase: development of a steroid epoxide-hydratase assay and properties of the enzyme. Eur J Biochem 97: 275–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fitzloff JF, Pan JC (1984) Epoxidation of the lindane metabolite, β-PCCH, by human- and rat-liver microsomes. Xenobiotica 14: 599–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glatt HR, Oesch F (1977) Inactivation of electrophilic metabolites by glutathione S-transferases and limitation of the system due to subcellular localization. Arch Toxicol 39: 87–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glatt HR, Oesch F (1985) Propyldazine is mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli: Distinct specificity for strains TAI 537 and TA97. Teratogenesis Carcinogenesis Mutagenesis 5: 339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glatt HR, Oesch F (1986) Structural and metabolic parameters governing the mutagenicity of poly- cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In: de Serres FJ (ed) Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for Their Detection, vol 10. Plenum Press, New York, pp 73–127Google Scholar
  7. Glatt HR, Oesch F, Frigerio A, Garattini S (1975) Epoxides metabolically produced from some known carcinogens and from some clinically used drugs. I. Differences in mutagenicity. Int J Cancer 16: 787–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glatt HR, Jung R, Oesch F (1983) Bacterial mutagenicity investigation of epoxides: drugs, drug metabolites, steroids and pesticides. Mutat Res 111: 99–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glatt HR, Mertes I, Wölfel T, Oesch F (1984) Epoxide hydrolases in laboratory animals and in man. In: Greim H, Jung R, Kramer M, Marquardt H, Oesch F (eds) Biochemical Basis of Chemical Carcinogenesis. Raven Press, New York, pp 107–121Google Scholar
  10. Glatt HR, Shtelzer S, Sheradsky T, Blum J, Oesch F (1986) Mutagenicity of N-substituted phenan- threne 9,10-imines in Salmonella typhimurium and Chinese hamster V79 cells. Environ Mutagenesis: in the pressGoogle Scholar
  11. Golan MD, Bücker M, Schmassmann HU, Raphael D, Jung R, Bindel U, Brase HO, Tegtmeyer F, Friedberg T, Lorenz J, Stasiecki P, Oesch F (1980) Characterization of dog hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes and resultant effects on benzo(a)pyrene metabolite pattern and mutagenicity. Drug Metab Disp 8: 121–126Google Scholar
  12. Gold B, Leuschen T, Brunk G, Gingell R (1981) Metabolism of a DDT metabolite via a chloroepoxide. Chem-Biol Interact 35: 159–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guenthner TM, Oesch F (1983) Identification and characterization of a new epoxide hydrolase from mouse liver microsomes. J Biol Chem 258: 15054–15061PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammock BD, Hasagawa LS (1983) Differential substrate selectivity of murine hepatic cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolases. Biochem Pharmacol 32: 1155–1164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammock BD, Gill SS, Mumby SM, Ota K (1980) Comparison of epoxide hydrases in the soluble and microsomal fractions of mammalian liver. In: Bhatnagar RS (ed) Molecular Basis of Environmental Toxicity. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp 229–272Google Scholar
  16. Harvey DJ, Glazener L, Stratton C, Johnson DB, Hill RM, Horning EC, Horning MG (1972) Detection of epoxides of allyl-substituted barbiturates in rat urine. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 4: 247–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayakawa T, Udenfriend S (1973) A simple radio-isotope assay for microsomal aryl hydroxylase. Analyt Biochem 51: 501–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IARC (1982) Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Supplement 4, International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato R (1979) Characteristics and differences in the hepatic mixed function oxidases of different species. Pharmacol Ther 6: 41–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyman SD, Poland A, Taylor BA (1980) Genetic polymorphism of microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity in the mouse. J Biol Chem 255: 8650–8654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mannervik B (1985) The isoenzymes of glutathione transferase. Adv Enzymol 57: 357–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mertes I, Fleischmann R, Glatt HR, Oesch F (1985) Interindividual variations in the activities of cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolase in human liver. Carcinogenesis 6: 219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagao M, Yahagi T, Kawachi T, Sugimura T, Kosuge T, Tsuji K, Wakabayashi K, Mizusaki S, Matsumoto T (1977) Comutagenic action of norharman and harman. Proc Japan Acad 53: 95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nebert DW, Gelboin HV (1968) Substrate-inducible microsomal aryl hydroxylase in mammalian cell culture. J Biol Chem 243: 6242–6249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nebert DW, Negishi M (1982) Multiple forms of cytochrome P-450 and the importance of molecular biology and evolution. Biochem Pharmacol 31: 2311–2317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oesch F, Glatt HR (1976) Evaluation of the importance of enzymes involved in the control of mutagenic metabolites. In: Montesano R, Bartsch R, Tomatis L (eds) Screening tests in chemical carcinogenesis. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 255–274Google Scholar
  27. Oesch F, Golan M (1980) Specificity of mouse liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolase for K-region epoxides derived from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Lett 9: 169–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oesch F, Schmassmann HU (1979) Species and organ specificity of the trans-stilbene oxide induced effects on epoxide hydratase and benzo(a)pyrene monooxygenase activity in rodents. Biochem Pharmacol 28: 171–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oesch F, Morris N, Daly JW, Gielen JE, Nebert DW (1973) Genetic expression the induction of epoxide hydrase and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activities in the mouse by phenobarbital or 3- methylcholanthrene. Mol Pharmacol 9: 692–696Google Scholar
  30. Oesch F, Friedberg T, Herbst M, Paul W, Wilhelm N, Bentley P (1982) Effects of lindane treatment on drug metabolizing enzymes and liver weight of CF1 mice in which it evoked hepatomas and in non-susceptible rodents. Chem-Biol Interact 40: 1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oesch F, Zimmer A, Glatt HR (1983) Microsomal epoxide hydrolase in different rat strains. Biochem Pharmacol 32: 1783–1788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Omura T, Sato R (1964) The carbon monoxide-binding pigment of liver microsomes. I. Evidence for its haemoprotein nature. J Biol Chem 239: 2370–2378Google Scholar
  33. Parkki MG, Marniemi J, Vainio H (1977) Long-term effects of single and combined doses of DDT and PCB on drug-metabolizing enzymes in rat liver. J Toxicol Environ Health 3: 903–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Planche G, Croisy A, Malaveille C, Tomatis L, Bartsch H (1979) Metabolic and mutagenicity studies on DDT and 15 derivatives. Detection of l,l-bis(p -chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane and 1,1- bis(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethyl acetate (kelthane acetate) as mutagens in Salmonella ty- phimurium and of l,l-bis(p -chlorophenyl)ethylene oxide, a likely metabolite, as an alkylating agent. Chem-Biol Interact 25: 157–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmassmann HU, Glatt HR, Oesch F (1976) A rapid assay for epoxide hydratase activity with ben-zo(a)pyrene 4,5-(K-region-)oxide as substrate. Analyt Biochem 74: 94–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sevanian A, Peterson AR (1984) Cholesterol epoxide is a direct-acting mutagen. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 81: 4198–4202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spielberg SP, Gordon GB, Blake DA, Mellitis ED, Bross DS (1981) Anticonvulsant toxicity in vitro: possible role of arene oxides. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 217: 386–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ullrich V, Weber P (1972) The 0-dealkylation of 7-ethoxycoumarin by liver microsomes. A direct fluo-metric test. Hoppe-Seylers Z Physiol Chem 353: 1171–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vesselinovitch SD, Kyriazis AP, Mihailovich N, Rao KVN (1975) Conditions modifying development of tumors in mice at various sites by benzo(a)pyrene. Cancer Res 35: 2948–2953PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker CH, Bentley P, Oesch F (1978) Phylogenetic distribution of epoxide hydratase in different vertebrate species, strains and tissues measured using three substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta 539: 427–434PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Watabe T, Kanai M, Isobe M, Ozawa N (1981) The hepatic microsomal biotransformation of J steroids to 5 α, β -glycols via α- and β-epoxides. J Biol Chem 256: 2900–2907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams CH, Kamin H (1962) Microsomal triphosphopyridine nucleotide cytochrome c reductase of liver. J Biol Chem 237: 587–595PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. R. Glatt
    • 1
  • F. Oesch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ToxicologyUniversity of MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations