Laue Diffraction from Protein Crystals: Theoretical Aspects

  • Keith Moffat
  • Durward Cruickshank
  • John Helliwell
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Biophysics book series (BIOPHYSICS, volume 2)


If a stationary crystal is illuminated by a polychromatic beam of x-rays or neutrons, then a Laue diffraction pattern results. Each Laue reflection arises from a central line (a ray) in reciprocal space, which may contain one or more reciprocal lattice points (RLPs) with associated structure factors. It has been clear since the first protein x-ray Laue patterns were obtained (Moffat et al., 1984, 1986; Bilderback et al., 1984; Helliwell, 1984, 1985; Hedman et al., 1985) that the Laue technique possesses a number of advantages. It makes optimum use of a naturally polychromatic spectrum such as that emitted by a bending magnet, wiggler or undulator on a synchrotron or storage ring source. Very brief exposure times in the millisecond range have been obtained on strongly scattering protein samples (Bilderback et al., 1984; Hajdu et al., 1986; Moffat et al., 1986). A stationary crystal yields integrated intensities directly, which are much less sensitive to transient changes in unit cell dimensions or crystal orientation than the (partial) intensities obtained by diffraction of monochromatic radiation. A typical Laue diffraction pattern contains many more reflections than a typical monochromatic, oscillation pattern. These advantages are particularly appropriate for dynamic experiments, in which the diffraction intensities change rapidly with time in response to a structural perturbation (Moffat et al., 1984, 1986; Helliwell, 1985).


Reciprocal Lattice Point Laue Exposure Laue Reflection Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source Laue Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bilderback, D.H., Moffat, K. and Szebenyi, D.M.E. (1984) Nucl. Instrum. And Methods 222, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, J.W., Habash, J., Helliwell, J.R. and Moffat, K. (1986) CCP4 Newsletter Number 18, SERC Daresbury Laboratory.Google Scholar
  3. Hajdu, J., Machin, P., Campbell, J.W., Clifton, I.J., Zurek, S., Gover, S. and Johnson, L.N. (1986) CCP4 Newsletter Number 17, SERC Daresbury Laboratory.Google Scholar
  4. Hedman, B., Hodgson, K.O., Helliwell, J.R., Liddington, R. and Papiz, M.Z. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 7604–7607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Helliwell, J.R. (1984) Repts. Progr. Physics. 47, 1403–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Helliwell, J.R. (1985) J. Mol. Struct. 130, 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalman, Z.H. (1979) Acta Cryst. A35, 634–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miyahara, J., Takahashi, K., Amemiya, Y., Kamiya, N. and Satow, Y. (1986) Nucl. Instrum. and Methods A246, 572–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moffat, K., Schildkamp, W., Bilderback, D.H. and Volz, K. (1986) Nucl. Instrum. and Methods A246, 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moffat, K., Szebenyi, D.M.E. and Bilderback, D.H. (1984) Science 223, 1423–1425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith Moffat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Durward Cruickshank
    • 3
    • 2
    • 4
  • John Helliwell
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Section of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of YorkYorkEngland
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUMISTManchesterEngland
  4. 4.SERC Daresbury LaboratoryWarringtonEngland

Personalised recommendations