Advertisement

Genetical Processes in Wild Mouse Populations. Past Myth and Present Knowledge

  • R. J. Berry
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 127)

Abstract

There is a widely accepted misconception that natural house mouse populations are rigid mosaics of small inbred demes which resist immigration and allow random spread and survival of inherited variation because of their small size and vulnerability to extinction. This myth is understandable, because there is a large amount of data apparently supporting it. Nevertheless it is a misleading perversion of the true situation. This paper is an attempt to provide a more accurate description of the processes that mould mouse populations, and the resulting consequences for the distribution of genetic variants.

Keywords

House Mouse Centric Fusion Robertsonian Translocation Faroe Island Mouse Population 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ADOPLH S. AND KLEIN J. (1981) Robertsonian variation in Mus musculus from Central Europe, Spain and Scotland. J. Hered. 72 219–221.Google Scholar
  2. ANDERSON P.K., DUNN L.C. AND BEASLEY A.B. (1964) Introduction of a lethal allele into a feral house mouse population. Am.Nat. 98 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BAKER A.E.M. (1981) Gene flow in house mice: introduction of a new allele into free-living populations. Evolution 35 243–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BELLAMY D., BERRY, R.J., JAKOBSON, M.E., LIDICKER, W.Z., MORGAN, J. AND MURPHY H.M. (1973) Ageing in an island population of the house mouse. Age and Ageing 2 235–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BERRY R.J. (1978) Genetic variation in wild house mice: where natural selection and history meet. Am. Scientist 66 52–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. BERRY R.J. (ed) (1981) The Biology of the House Mouse. London and New York: AcademicGoogle Scholar
  7. BERRY R.J. (1982) Neo-Darwinism. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
  8. BERRY R.J. (1983) Diversity and differentiation: the importance of island biology for general theory. Oikos 41 523–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BERRY R.J., BONNER W.N. AND PETERS, J. (1979) Natural selection in mice from South Georgia (South Atlantic Ocean). J. Zool. Lond. 189 385–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BERRY R.J. AND JAKOBSON M.E. (1974) Vagility in an island population of the house mouse. J. Zool. Lond. 173 341–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BERRY R.J. AND JAKOBSON M.E. (1975) Ecological genetics of an island population of the house mouse. J. Zool. Lond. 175 523–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. BERRY R.J., JAKOBSON M.E. AND PETERS J. (1978) The house mouse of the Faroe Islands: a study in microdifferentiation. J. Zool. Lond. 185 73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. BERRY R.J. AND MURPHY H.M. (1970) Biochemical genetics of an island population of the house mouse. Proc. R. Soc. B 176 87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. BERRY R.J. AND PETERS J. (1975) Macquarie Island house mice: a genetical isolate on a sub-Antarctic island. J. Zool. Lond. 176 375–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. BERRY R.J. AND PETERS J. (1977) Heterogeneous heterozygosities in Mus muculus populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 197 485–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. BERRY R.J., PETERS J. AND VAN AARDE R.J. (1978) Sub-Antarctic house mice: colonization, survival and selection. J. Zool. Lond. 184 127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. BERRY R.J., SAGE R.D., LIDICKER W.Z. AND JACKSON W.B. (1980) Genetical variation in three Pacific house mouse populations. J. Zool. Lond. 193 391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. BERRY R.J. AND TRICKER B.J.K. (1969) Competition and extinction: the mice of Ebula, with notes on those of Fair Isle and St Kilda. J. Zool. Lond. 158 247–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. BLAIR W.F. (1953) Population dynamics of rodents and other small mammals. Adv. Genet. 5 1–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. BOYSE E.A., BEAUCHAMP G.K. AND YAMAZAKI K. (1983) Critical review: the sensory perception of genotypic polymorphism of the Major Histocompatibility Gomplex and other genes: some physiological and phylogenetic implications. Hum. Immunol. 6, 177–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. BROOKER P. (1982) Robertsonian translocations in Mus musculus from N E Scotland and Orkney. Heredity 48 305–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. BRYANT E.H. (1974) On the adaptive significance of enzyme polymorphisms in relation to environmental variability. Am. Nat. 108 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. CAPANNA E. (1980) Chromosomal rearrangement and speciation in progress in Mus musculus. Folia Zool. 29 43–57Google Scholar
  24. DE FRIES J.C AND MCCLEARN G.E. (1972) Behavioral genetics and the fine structure of mouse populations: a study in microevolution. In Evolutionary Biology 5 279–91. DOBZHANSKY TH., HECHT M.R. AND STEER W.C. (eds) New York: Appleton-Century-CroftsGoogle Scholar
  25. DEOL M.S., GRüNEBERG H., SEARLE A.G. AND TRUSLOVE G.M. (1960) How pure are our inbred strains of mice? Genet. Res. 1 50–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DUESER R.D. AND BROWN W.C. (1980) Ecological correlates of insular rodent diversity. Ecology 61 50–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. EHRLICH P.R. AND RAVEN P.H. (1969) Differentiation of populations. Science, N.Y. 165 1228–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. FERRIS S.D., SAGE R.D., HUANG C-M., NIELSEN J.T., RITTE U. AND WILSON A.C. (1983) Flow of mitochondrial DNA across a species boundary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80 2290–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. FIGUEROA F., GOLUBIC M., NIZETIC D. AND KLEIN J. (1985) Evolution of mouse major histocompatibility complex genes borne by t chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 2819–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. FITCH W.M. AND ATCHLEY W.R. (1985) Evolution in inbred strains of mice appears rapid. Science N.Y. 228 1169–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. FORD C.E. AND EVANS E.P. (1973) Robertsonian translocations in mice: segregational irregularities in male heterozygotes and zygotic unbalance. Chromosomes Today 4 387–97Google Scholar
  32. GROPP A., TETTENBORN U. AND LEHMANN E.V. (1970). Chromosomen variation vom Robertson’chen Typus bei der Tabakmaus, M. poschiavinus, und ihren Hybriden mit der Laboratoriumsmaus. Cytogenetics 9 9–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. HALDANE J.B.S. AND JAYAKAR S.D. (1963) Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. J. Genet. 58 237–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. HUXLEY J.S. (1942) Evolution, the Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and UnwinGoogle Scholar
  35. KING C.M. (1982) Age structure and reproduction in feral New Zealand populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus) in relation to seedfall of southern beech (Nothofagus). New Zealand J. Zool. 9 467–80Google Scholar
  36. KLEIN J. (1975) Biology of the Mouse Histocompatibility-2 Complex. New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  37. KLEIN J. (1979) Population genetics of the murine chromosome 17. Israel J. med. Sci. 15 859–66Google Scholar
  38. LANDE R. (1979) Effective deme sizes during longterm evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution 33 234–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LARSON A., Prager E.M. and Wilson A.C. (1984). Chromosomal evolution, speciation and morphological change in vertebrates: the role of social behaviour. Chromosomes Today 8 215–28Google Scholar
  40. LENINGTON S. (1983) Social preferences for partners carrying ‘good genes’ in wild house mice. Anim. Ben. 31 325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LENINGTON S. AND EGID K. (1985) Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T locus: a response to T-locus or H-2-locus variability? Ben. Genet. 15 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LEWONTIN R.C. AND DUNN L.C. (1960) Ihe evolutionary dynamics of a polymorphism in the house mouse. Genetics 45 705–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. LEVINE L., ROCKWELL R.F. AND GROSSFIELD J. (1980) Sexual selection in mice. V reproductive competition between +/+ and +/t5 males. Am. Nat. 116 150–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. LIDICKER W.Z. (1976) Social behaviour and density regulation in house mice living in large enclosures. J. Anim. Ecol. 45 677–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MIYADA C.G., KLOFELT, C., REYES, A.A., MCLAUGHLIN-TAYLOR E. AND WALLACE R.B. (1985). Evidence that polymorphism in the murine major histocompatibility complex may be generated by the assortment of subgene sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 2890–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MORIWAKI K., YONEKAWA H., GOTOH O., MINEZAWA M., WINKING H. AND GROPP A. (1984) Implications of the genetic divergence between European wild mice with.Robertsonian translocations from the viewpoint of mitochondrial DNA. Genet. Res. 43 277–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MYERS J. H. (1974a) Genetic and social structure of feral house mouse populations on Grizzly Island, California. Ecology 55 747–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. MYERS J.H. (1974b) The absence of t alleles in feral populations of house mice. Evolution 27 702–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. NADEAU J.H., COLLINS R.L. AND KLEIN J. (1982). Organization and evolution of the mammalian genome. Genetics 102 583–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. NASH H.R., BROOKER P.C. AND DAVIS S.J.M. (1983) The Robertsonian translocation house-mouse populations of north east Scotland: a study of their origin and evolution. Heredity 50 303–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. NAUMOV N.P. (1940) The ecology of the hillock mouse, Mus musculus hortulanus. Nordm. J. Inst. Evolut. Morph. 3 33–77 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  52. NEVO E. (1983a) Population genetics and ecology: the interface. In Evolution from Molecules to Men: 287–321. Bendall D.S. (ed). Cambridge: University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. NEVO E. (1983b) Adaptive significance of protein variation. In Protein Polymorphism: Adaptive and Taxonomic Significance: 239–82. Oxford, G.S. and Rollinson D. (eds) London and New York: AcademicGoogle Scholar
  54. NEWTON M.F. AND PETERS J. (1983) Physiological variation of mouse haemoglobins. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 218 443–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. PENNYCUIK P.R., JOHNSTON P.G, LIDICKER W.Z. AND WESTWOOD N.H. (1978) Introduction of a male sterile allele (tW2) into a population of house mice housed in a large outdoor enclosure. Aust. J. Zool. 26 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. PETRAS M.L. (1967) Studies of natural populations of Mus. I. Biochemical populations and their bearing on breeding structure. Evolution, 21 259–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. PETRAS M.L. AND TOPPING J.C. (1983) The maintenance of polymorphisms at two loci in house mouse (Mus musculus) populations. Cand. J. Genet. Cytol. 25 190–201.Google Scholar
  58. PHILIP U. (1938) Mating system in wild populations of Dermestes vulpines and Mus musculus. J. Genet. 36. 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. SAGE R.D. (1981) Wild mice. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research, vol. 1: 39–90 (Foster H.L., Small, I.D. and Fox I.D., (eds)) New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  60. SCHRöDER J.H. AND OTTEN I-S. (1985) Increase in aggressiveness of male mice carrying a reciprocal translocation T(10,13) in the heterozygous state. Beh. Genet. 15 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. SELANDER R.K. (1970) Behavior and genetic variation in natural populations. An. Zool. 10 53–66Google Scholar
  62. SINGLETON G.R. AND HAY D.A. (1983) The effect of social organization on reproductive success and gene flow in colonies of wild house mice, Mus musculus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12 49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. SPIRITO F., MODESTI A., PERTICONE P., CRISTALDI M., FEDERICI R. AND RIZZONI M. (1980) Mechanisms of fixation of accumulation of centric fusions in natural populations of Mus musculus. I. Karyological analysis of a hybrid zone between two populations in the Central Appenines. Evolution 34 453–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. STICKEL L.C. (1979) Population ecology of house mice in unstable habitats. J. Anim. Ecol. 48 871–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. TAKADA Y. (1985) Demography in island and mainland populations of the feral house mouse, Mus musculus molossinus. J. mammal. Soc. Japan feral house mouse, Mus musculus molossinus. J. mammal. Soc. Japan 10 179–91 Google Scholar
  66. WALIACE M.E. (1965) The relative homozygosity of inbred lines and closed colonies. J. theoret. Biol. 9 93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. WHITMORE A.C. AND WHITMORE S.P. (1985) Subline divergence within L.C. Strong’s C3H and CBA inbred mouse strains. A review. Immunogenetics 21 407–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. YAMAZAKI K., BEAUCHAMP G.K., WYSOCKI C. J., BARD J., THOMAS L. AND BOYSE E.A. (1983) Recognition of H-2 types in relation to the blocking of pregnancy in mice. Science N.Y. 221 186–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. YAMAZAKI K., BOYSE E.A., MIKE V., THAKER H.T., MATHIESON B.J., ABBOTT J., BOYSE J., ZAYAS Z.A. AND THOMAS L. (1976) Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J. exp. Med. 144 1324–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. J. Berry

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations