Advertisement

Origin and Evolution of Mice: An Appraisal of Fossil Evidence and Morphological Traits

  • L. Thaler
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 127)

Abstract

Systematics of mice has progressed during the last 16 years owing to biochemical genetics (Selander et al. 1969, other references to be found mainly in Marshall and Sage 1981, Thaler et al. 1981a, 1981b, Bonhomme, this symposium). Such studies have brought about the collapse of most older ideas which were based on morphology. However the very progress due to genetics has promoted a revival of morphology. The genus Mus as well as its taxonomic components (species, subspecies, chromosomal races), have recently been redefined. The interactions between these taxa (sympatry, parapatry; syntopy and allopatry; various degrees and modes of introgression; direct and indirect competition) are now better understood. These have revealed complex phylogenetic relationships: diverging and reticulate evolution. It now becomes necessary to place the evolution of mice in real time in history, prehistory and geology. Thus, the fossil and subfossil remains of mice have to be studied, morphologically and biometrically.

Keywords

Tail Length House Mouse Chromosomal Race Tooth Size Extinct Genus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonhomme F, Iskandar D, Thaler L, Petter F (1984) Electromorphs and phylogeny in muroïd rodents. In: Evolutionary relationships among rodents: A multidisciplinary analysis. WP Luckett & JL Hartenberger, Plenum Pub Corp, New York: 671–684.Google Scholar
  2. Britton J and Thaler L (1978) Evidence for the presence of two sympatric species of mice (Genus Mus L.) in southern France based on biochemical genetics. Biochem genet 16:213–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chabbar Ameur R, Jaeger J-J, Michaux J (1976) Radiometric age of early Hipparion fauna in Northwest Africa. Nature 261 (5555): 38–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darviche D (1978) Approche morphologique et biométrique de la biosystématique à la lumière de la génétique biochimique des populations. Application aux genres Mus et Apodemus (Mammalia-Rodentia). Doc. 3ème cycle, Univ. Montpellier 191 p.Google Scholar
  5. Darviche D and Orsini Ph (1982) Critères de différenciation morphologique et biométrique de deux espèces de souris sympatriques: Mus spretus et Mus musculus domesticus. Mammalia 46(2):205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerassimov S, pers. com.Google Scholar
  7. Iskandar D and Bonhomme F (1984) Variabilité électrophorétique totale à 11 loci structuraux chez les rongeurs muridés (Muridae, Rodentia). Can J Genet Cytol 26 (5):622–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobs LL, Pilbeam D (1980) Of Mice and Men: Fossil-based divergence dates and molecular “Clocks”. J Human Evol 9 (7):551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Janossy D (1961) Die Entwicklung der kleinsäugerfauna Europas im Pleistozän (Insectivora, Rodentia, Lagomorpha). Z f Säugetierkunde 26:1–11.Google Scholar
  10. Marshall JT and Sage RD (1981) Taxonomy of the House Mouse. Symp Zool Soc Lond 47:15–25.Google Scholar
  11. Mayhew DF (1977) The endemic pleistocene Murids of Crete. I Proc Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 80:182–201.Google Scholar
  12. Michaux J (1971) Muridae Néogènes d’Europe Sud-Occidentale. Paléobiologie continenetale, Montpellier, II (1): 71 p.Google Scholar
  13. Miller GS (1912) Catalogue of the Mammals of Western Europe. British Museum (Natural History), Londres 1019 p.Google Scholar
  14. Schwarz E and Schwarz HK (1943) The wild and commensal stocks of the house mouse, Mus musculus. J Mammal 24:59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Selander RK, Hunt WG and Yang SY (1969) Protein polymorphism and genic heterozygosity in two european subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 23:379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thaler L, Bonhomme F, Britton-Davidian J and Hamar M (1981a). The House mouse complex of species: sympatric occurence of biochemical groups Mus 2 and Mus 4 in Rumania. Z f Säugetierkunde 46:169–173.Google Scholar
  17. Thaler L, Bonhomme F and Britton-Davidian J (1981b). Processes of speciation and semi-speciation in the house mouse. Symp Zool Soc Lond 47:27–41.Google Scholar
  18. Thorpe RS, Corti M and Capanna E (1982) Morphometric divergence of Robertsonian populations/species of Mus: A multivariate analysis of size and shape. Experientia 38:920–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Thaler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations