Advertisement

Molecular Modeling in Drug Design

  • G. R. Marshall
Part of the Psychopharmacology Series book series (PSYCHOPHARM, volume 3)

Abstract

Molecular recognition plays a central role in biological systems and is the basis of the specificity seen in antigen-antibody, substrate-enzyme, hormone-receptor, and drug-receptor interactions. The importance of this problem had been recognized by scientists like Pasteur and Ehrlich at the end of the nineteenth century. Structure-activity relations in which one probes the basis of recognition by chemically modifying one of the partners form a significant segment of medicinal chemistry. Attempts to correlate activity with physical properties such as solubility, refractive index, etc., are a reasonable approach to definining the characteristic properties associated with activity in a given biological assay (Hansch 1966). In most systems, these correlations reflect the effective concentration of the drug in the critical biophase rather than the critical features necessary for bimolecular recognition. We would like to concentrate on what can be deduced regarding bimolecular recognition from structure-activity data.

Keywords

Drug Design Orientation Space Pharmacophore Hypothesis Pharmacophoric Group Gamma Butyrolactone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bierzynsk A, Kim PS, Ballwin RL (1982) A salt bridge stabilizes the helix formed by isolated C-peptide of RNase A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 2470–2474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crippen GM (1981) Distance geometry and conformational calculations. In: Bawden D (ed) Chemometrics research studies series, vol 1. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  3. Duchamp DJ (1979) Molecular mechanics and crystal structure analysis in drug design. In: Olson EC, Christoffersen RE (eds) Computer-assisted drug design. ACS symposium series 112. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fries DS, Portoghese PS (1976) Stereochemical studies on medicinal compounds. 20. Absolute configuration and analgetic potency of alpha-promedol enantiomers. The role of the C-4 chiral center in conferring stereoselectivity in axial- and equitorial-phenyl prodine congeners. J Med Chem 19: 1155–1158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Greenberg DA, Barry CD, Marshall GR (1978) Investigation and parameterization of a molecular dielectric function. J Am Chem Soc 100: 4020–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gund P (1979) Pharmacophore pattern searching and receptor mapping. Ann Rep Med Chem 14: 299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansch C (1969) A quantitative approach to biochemical structure-activity relationships. Acc Chem Res 2: 232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Humblet C, Marshall GR (1981) Three-dimensional computer modeling as an aid to drug design. Drug Dev Res 1: 409–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klunk WE, Kalman BL, Ferrendelli JA, Covey DF (1983) Computer-assisted modeling of the picrotoxinin and gamma-butyrolactone receptor site. Mol Pharmacol 23: 511–518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Levine J A, Ferrendelli JA, Covey DF (1985) Convulsant and anti-eonvulsant gammabutyrol-actones bind to the picrotoxinin/t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate ( TBPS) receptor. Biochem Pharmacol 34: 4187–4190Google Scholar
  11. Marshall GR, Barry CD, Bosshard HE, Dammkoehler RA, Dunn DA (1979) The conformational parameter in drug design: the active analog approach. In: Olsen EC, Christoffersen RE (eds) Computer-assisted drug design. ACS symposium series 112. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mathews DA, Bolin JT, Burridge JM, Filman DJ, Volz KW, Kaufman BT, Beddell CR, Champness JN, Stammers DK, Kraut J (1985) Refined crystal structures of Escherichia coli and chicken liver dihydrofolate reductase containing bound trimethoprim. J Biol Chem 260: 381–391Google Scholar
  13. Mayer D, Motoc I, Marshall GR (1986) Determination of an active site model of angiotensin converting enzyme. J Med Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Motoc I, Dammkoehler RA, Marshall GR (1985) Three-dimensional structure-activity relationships and biological receptor mapping. In: Trinajstic N (ed) Application of mathematical concepts to chemistry. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Parthasarathy R, Fridey SM (1984) Conformational variability of NAD + in the free and bound11 states: a nicotinamide sandwich in NAD + crystals. Science 226: 969–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roques BP, Lucas-Soroca E, Chaillet P, Costentin J, Fournie-Zaluski J (1983) Complete differentiation between enkephalinase and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition by retrothiorphan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 3178–3182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Russell B (1945) A history of western philosophy. Simon and Schuster, New York, p 472Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Marshall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PharmacologyWashington University Medical SchoolSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations