Advertisement

Efficiency of CT in Bone Tumors

  • G. Lechner
  • F. Karnel
  • W. Kumpan
  • M. Schratter
  • P. Ritschl
Conference paper
Part of the Radiology Today book series (RADIOL.TODAY, volume 4)

Abstract

Although plain film remains the most essential diagnostic modality, computed tomography (CT) is considered in many instances as the second most important investigation in bone tumors [10, 20]. With benign tumors CT has usually limited importance: its importance increases with the tumor’s aggressiveness and tendency to infiltrate surrounding tissues. This general statement is particularly true if surgery is considered for certain tumors such as malignant neoplasm of the long bones and of specific complex anatomic areas, e.g., pelvis, spine, thorax, and large joints. The high contrast resolution and the axial view of CT gives unique information in these situations, which is many times indispensable for management of the patients. Usually CT adds less assistance compared to the plain film in arriving at a primary diagnosis. Generally plain film gives a more complete overview and important differential diagnostic features, e.g., the various periosteal reactions are less obvious on CT with tumors of the long bones due to the slice thickness and axial view.

Keywords

Bone Tumor Plain Film Fibrous Dysplasia Giant Cell Tumor Osteoid Osteoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alsen AM, Martel WM, Braunstein EM, McMillin KI, Phillips WA, Kling TF (1986) MRI and CT evaluation of primary bone and soft-tissue tumors. AJR 146: 749Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azoz EM, Esseltine DW, Chevalier L, Gledhill RB (1982) Radiologic evaluation of osteosarcoma. J Can Assoc Radiol 33: 167Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coffre C, Vanel D, Contesso G, Kalifa C, Dubousset J, Genin J, Masselot J (1985) Problems and pitfalls in the use of computed tomography for the local evaluation of long bone osteosarcoma: report on 30 cases. Skeletal Radiol 13: 147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daffner RH, Kirks DR, Geweiler JA, Heaston DK (1982) Computed tomography of fibrous dysplasia. AJR 139: 943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Santos LA, Bernardino ME, Murray JA (1979) Computed tomography in the evaluation of osteosarcoma: experience with 25 cases. AJR 132: 535Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Destouet JM, Gilula LA, Murphy WA (1979) Computed tomography of long bone osteosarcoma. Radiology 131: 439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enneking WF, Kagan A (1978) Transepiphysed extension of osteosarcoma: incidence, mechanism and implications. Cancer 41: 1526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gamba JL, Martinez S, Apple J, Harreison JM, Nunley J A (1984) Computed tomography of axial skeletal osteoid osteomas. AJR 142: 769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ginaldi S (1980) Computed tomography feature of synovial osteochondromatosis. Skeletal Radiol 5: 219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffiths HJ, Hamlin DJ, Kiss S, Lovelock J (1981) Efficiency of CT scanning in a group of 174 patients with orthopedic and musculoskeletal problems. Skeletal Radiol 7: 87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hermann G, Rose JS, Strauss L (1984) Tumor infiltration of the bone marrow: comparative study using computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 11: 17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hudson TM, Chew FS (1982) Radionucleide bone scanning of osteosarcoma: falsely extended uptake pattern. AJR 139: 49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hudson TM, Schiebler M, Springfield DS, Hawkins IF Jr, Enneking WF, Spanier SS (1983) Radiologic imaging of osteosarcoma. Role in planning surgical treatment. Skeletal Radiol 10: 137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hudson TM, Hamlin DJ, Enneking WF, Pettersson H (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors: early experience in 31 patients compared with computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 13: 134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones ET, Kuhns LR, Arbor A (1981) Pitfalls in the use of computed tomography, for musculoskeletal tumors in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 63: 1297Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kenney PJ, Gilula LA, Murphy WA (1981) The use of computed tomography to distinguish osteochondroma and chondrosarcoma. Radiology 139: 129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Köster O, Distelmaier W, Lackner K (1984) Com- putertomographische Kontrolle konventionell röntgenologischer Befunde bei Raumforderungen des knöchernen Beckens. Fortschtr Röntgenstr 141: 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumpan W, Lechner G, Wittich GR, Salzer- Kuntschik M, Delling G, Kotz R, Hajek P, Sekera J (1985) The angiographic response of osteosarcoma following pre-operative chemotherapy. Skeletal Radiol 15: 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levine E, De Smet AA, Neff JR (1984) Role of radiologic imaging in management planning of giant cell tumor of bone. Skeletal Radiol 12: 79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lukens JA, McLeod RA, Sim FH (1982) Computed tomographic evaluation of primary osseous malignant neoplasms. AJR 139: 45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mail JT, Cohen MD, Mirkin LD, Provisor AJ (1985) Response of osteosarcoma to preoperative intravenous high dose methotrexate chemotherapy: CT evaluation. AJR 144: 89Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Majewski A, Freyschmidt J (1982) Computertomographie bei Tumoren des Beckenskeletts Fortschr Röntgenstr 136 (6): 635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pozniak M, Petasnick JP, Matalon TAS, Bayard WJ (1985) Computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of pelvic and extrapelvic disease. Radio- Graphics 5: 587Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramos A, Castello J, Sartorius DJ, Greenway GD, Resnick D, Haghighi P (1985) Osseous lipoma: CT appearance. Radiology 157: 615Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shikhoda A, Jaffe N, Wallace S, Ayala A, Lindell M, Zorinoza J (1985) Computed tomography of osteosarcoma after intra-arterial chemotherapy. AJR 144: 95Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simon MA, Kirchner PT (1980) Scintigraphic evaluation of primary bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 62: 758Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Solomon A, Rahamani R, Seligsohn U, Ben-Artzi F (1984) Multiple myeloma: early vertebral involvement assessed by computerized tomography. Skeletal Radiol 11: 258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Lechner
  • F. Karnel
  • W. Kumpan
  • M. Schratter
  • P. Ritschl

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations