Advertisement

Intestinal Preservation of Small-Bowel Grafts by Vascular Washout and Cold Storage

  • W. H. Schraut
  • K. K. W. Lee
  • Y. Tsujinaka
Conference paper

Abstract

The development of an effective method for preserving the small intestine during the interval between harvesting and implantation is a key factor to the success of future clinical small-bowel transplantation. In particular, a method of small-bowel preservation which allows for functional graft survival after ischemic intervals of up to 24 h should be devised. Such an interval is desirable to permit unhurried graft procurement from cadaveric donors and recipient preparation until the actual implantation is completed.

Keywords

Cold Storage Vascular Anastomosis Entire Small Intestine Hypothermic Storage Accessory Graft 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gabbert H, Wagner R, Aust P, Höhn P (1978) Ischemia and post-ischemic regeneration of the small intestinal mucosa. An enzyme-histochemical investigation. Acta Histochem 63: 197–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hohenleitner FJ, Senior JR (1969) Metabolism of canine small intestine vascularly perfused in vitro. J App Physiol 26: 119–128Google Scholar
  3. Lee KKW, Schraut WH (1986) Structure and function of orthotopic small-bowel allografts in rats treated with cyclosporin A. Am J Surg (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Manax WG, Bloch JH, Eyal Z, Lillehei RC (1965) Experimental preservation of the small bowel. Am J Surg 109: 26–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mozes MF, Finch WT, Reckard CR, Merkel FK, Cohen C (1985) Comparison of cold storage and machine perfusion of cadaver kidneys: A prospective, randomized study. Transplant Proc 17: 1474–1477Google Scholar
  6. Pitha J (1971) The fine structure of regenerating epithelium in the small intestine. Virchows Arch [Cell Pathol] 7: 314–341Google Scholar
  7. Ricour C, Revillon Y, Pletyncx M, Laufenburger A, Jehannin B, Ghnassia D, Duval C, Ghnassia J-C, Jos J, Fontaine J-L, Navarro J, Schmitz J, Gallix P (1981) Conservation hypothermique et autotransplantation du grêle chez le porcelet. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 5: 977–986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Robinson JWL, Mirkovitch V (1972) The recovery of fonction and microcirculation in small intestinal loops following ischaemia. Gut 13: 784–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Robinson JWL, Antonioli JA, Mirkovitch V (1966) The intestinal response to ischemia. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 255: 178–191Google Scholar
  10. Schraut WH, Rosemurgy AS, Riddell RM (1983) Prolongation of intestinal allograft survival without immunosuppressive drug therapy. Transplantation of small bowel allografts. J Surg Res 34: 597–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Toledo-Pereyra LH, Najarian JS (1973) Small bowel preservation: Comparison of perfusion and nonperfusion systems. Arch Surg 107: 875–877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wagner R, Gabbert H, Höhn P (1979) Ischemia and post-ischemic regeneration of the small intestinal mucosa. A light microscopic and autoradiographic study. Virchows Arch [Cell Pathol] 31: 259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. H. Schraut
  • K. K. W. Lee
  • Y. Tsujinaka

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations