Skip to main content

Evaluation of Convergent and Discriminant Validity by Use of Structural Equations

  • Chapter
Personality Assessment via Questionnaires

Abstract

The multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix is a correlation matrix of a set of traits, each of which is measured by the same set of methods. Such a matrix can be generated when there are at least two traits being measured by at least two different methods. Two measures of the same trait should intercorrelate highly in order to indicate “convergent” validity. In addition, the correlation between two methods designed to measure the same trait should be substantially higher than the correlation between two traits when they are measured by the same method. This would be called “discriminant” validity. The idea of analyzing a multitrait-multimethod matrix to determine convergent and discriminant validity was introduced by Campbell and Fiske in 1959. Several generalizations have so far been proposed (Fiske, 1982).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alwin, D.F. (1974). Approaches to the interpretation of relationships in the multitrait-multimethod matrix. In Costner, H.L. (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1973–1974 (pp. 79–105). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31 ,419–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88 ,588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M., & Weeks, D.G. (1980). Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psy chometrika 45 ,289–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H.M. (1982). Conceptualization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 ,81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O.D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation methods. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, D.W. (1982). Convergent-discriminant validation in measurements and research strategies. In Brinberg, D., & Kidder, L. (Eds.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Forms of validity in research (No. 12, 77–92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D.R. (1975). Causal analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Weber, J., & Lundmark, J. (1975). A multitrait-multimethod analysis of four attitude assessment procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11 ,149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D.N. (1975). Multimethod factor analysis: A reformulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10 ,259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (1971 a). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika ,36 ,409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (1971b). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36 ,109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1978). Lisrel: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood (Version IV). Chicago: NER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1979). Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Cambridge, Mass.: Abt. Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V. Analysis of linear structural relationship by maximum likelihood and least squares methods (Research report 81–8). Uppsala: University of Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. (1976). An empirical application of confirmatory factor analysis to the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12 ,247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D.A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezmovic, E.L., & Rezmovic, V. (1981). A confirmatory factor analysis approach to construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41 ,61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1978). Path analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2 ,157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., Coyle, B.W., & Saari, B.B. (1977). A review and critique of analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12 ,447–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. (1984). Worry and emotionality as separate components in test anxiety. Inter national Review of Applied Psychology, 33 ,205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Schwarzer, C. (1982). Achievement anxiety with respect to reference groups in school. Journal of Educational Research, 75 ,305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem ,M., & Lange, B. (1982). A longitudinal study of worry and emotionality. In Schwarzer, R., van der Ploeg, H., & Spielberger, C.D. (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 1). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C.D. (1979). State-trait personality inventory. Preliminary professional manual. University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38 ,1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P.H., & Marx, R.W. (1981). Convergent and discriminant validity in self-concept measurement. Annual Meeting of the AERA ,Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwarzer, R. (1986). Evaluation of Convergent and Discriminant Validity by Use of Structural Equations. In: Angleitner, A., Wiggins, J.S. (eds) Personality Assessment via Questionnaires. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70753-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70751-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics