Advertisement

New Sonographic Criteria in Monitoring the First Trimester of Pregnancy

  • E. Ferrazzi
  • B. Brambati
  • A. Lanzani
  • A. Oldrini

Abstract

The reliable determination of gestational age and the ascertainment of pregnancy viability in cases of threatened abortion are by far the two most important contributions of sonography in the first trimester of pregnancy. The development of sophisticated sonographic techniques is creating new methods of sonographic investigation applicable in the first trimester. These new techniques have raised a number of questions: When routinely used, is the precision of the new equipment sufficient to offer data that are more accurate than traditional clinical information and to provide insight, into biological events? Will high-resolution intrauterine images permit traditional clinical classifications of first trimester pregnancy complications to be refined so that direct comparisons with classifications of embryopathies can be made? First trimester prenatal diagnosis is an interesting field where the capabilities of these new sonographic techniques can be tested.

Keywords

Amniotic Membrane Normal Birth Weight Female Embryo Threatened Abortion Sonographic Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gustavii B (1984) Chorionic biopsy and miscarriage in first trimester. Lancet 10: 562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mantoni M, Pedersen JF (1982) Fetal growth delay in threatened abortion: an ultrasound study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89: 525–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore GW, Hutchins GM, O’Rahilly R (1981) The estimated age of staged human embryos and early fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139: 500–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nelson LH (1981) Comparison of methods for determining crown-rump measurement by real-time ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 9: 67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patten EM (1946) Human embryology Blakiston, Philadelphia, p 181Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pedersen JF (1982) Fetal crown-rump length measurement by ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89: 926–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Robinson HP (1975) Gestation sac volume as determined by sonar in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82: 100–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robinson HP, Fleming JEE (1975) A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82: 702–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rushton DI (1978) Simplified classification of spontaneous abortions. J Med Genet 15: 1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shapiro S, Levine HS, Abramowicz M (1971) Advances in planned parenthood b, 45. Excerpta Medica New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simpson JS (1985) Fetal loss rate after normal ultrasound at eight weeks gestation. International Symposium on first trimester fetal diagnosis. Human Genetics (in press).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Streeter GL (1951) Developmental horizons in human embryos XI to XXIII. Carnegie Institute of Washington. Lord Baltimore, Baltimore (Embryology Reprint, Vol II ) Baltimore, Lord Baltimore Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson RD, Kendrik V, Wittman BK, MacGillivray BC (1984) Risk of spontaneous abortion in ultrasonically normal pregnancies. Lancet 20: 920CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Ferrazzi
    • 1
  • B. Brambati
    • 1
  • A. Lanzani
    • 1
  • A. Oldrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto Ostetrico GinecologicoL. Mangiagalli, Dell’Universita’ di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations