The Literature of CAD in Magnetics

  • D. A. Lowther
  • P. P. Silvester

Abstract

Design is an art and must be studied through examples like any other art. Engineering design naturally includes a large element of engineering science, which is best acquired in an analytic and deductive fashion. Expertise in the art of design, on the other hand, is best learned by case studies and by emulation of others. To aid the reader in finding examples related to specific classes of problems, this bibliography is provided.

Keywords

IEEE Transaction Finite Element Solution Finite Element Program Proprietary Software Annotate Bibliography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Introduction

  1. Freeman, E. M.: Interactive computer aided design of electric machines and electromagnetic apparatus. Journal of Applied Physics, 53, pp. 8393–8397, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lord, W.: Application of numerical field modelling to electromagnetic methods of nondestructive testing. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2437–2442, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Okabe, M., Okada, M., Tsuchiya, H.: Effects of magnetic characteristics of materials in the iron loss in the three phase transformer core. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2192–2194, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Preston, T. W., Reece, A. B. J.: The contribution of the finite–element method to the design of electrical machines: an industrial viewpoint. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2375–2380, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Raby, K. F.: On getting the right answer. IEEE Proceedings, 123, pt. A, pp.39–45, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. Silvester, P. P.: Interactive computer aided design in magnetics. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-17, pp. 3388–3392, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnetic Material Representation

  1. Baran, W.: Core magnet assembly with anisotropic Alnico permanent magnets. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2498–2501, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhadra, S. N.: A direct method to predict instantaneous saturation curve from rms saturation curve. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 1867–1870, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binns, K. J., Low, T. S., Jabbar, M. A.: Behaviour of a polymer-bonded rare-earth magnet under excitation in two directions at right angles. IEE Proceedings, 130, pt. B, pp. 25–32, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Brauer, J. R., Larkin, L. A., Overbye, V. D.: Finite element modeling of permanent magnet devices. Journal of Applied Physics, 55, pp. 2183–2185, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, P., Al-Murshid, S. A.: The effect of the magnetization distribution within anisotropic Alnico magnets upon field calculation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-16, 5, pp. 1032–1034, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, P., Al-Murshid, S. A.: A model of anisotropic Alnico magnets for field computation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 898–904, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Sherbiny, M. K.: Representation of the magnetization characteristic by a sum of exponentials. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-9, pp. 60–61, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forghani, B., Freeman, E. M., Lowther, D. A., Silvester, P. P.: Interactive modelling of magnetisation curves. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 1070–1072, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanalla, A. Y., Macdonald, D. C.: Representation of soft magnetic materials. IEE Proceedings, 127, pt. A, pp. 386–391, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamminga, W.: Finite-element solutions for devices with permanent magnets. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 8, pp. 841–855, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lakehal, M., Jufer, M.: Finite elements calculation of polarized, anisotropic and saturated electromechanical structures. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2491–2493, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lord, W.: Demagnetisation phenomena in high–performance d.c. servomotors. IEE Proceedings, 122, pp. 392–394, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Sarma, M. S.: Analysis and design considerations for permanent-magnet aerospace-instrument devices. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-16, pp. 797–799, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Slomczynska, J.: Nonlinear analysis of the magnetic flux distribution in the magnetized magnet stabilized in air. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-10, pp. 1109–1113, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weiss, J., Garg, V. K., Shah, M., Sternheim, E.: Finite element analysis of magnetic fields with permanent magnet. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1933–1935, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Widger, G. F. T.: Representation of magnetisation curves over extensive range by rational-fraction approximation. IEE Proceedings, 116, pp. 156–160, 1969.Google Scholar

The Potential Equations of Magnetics

  1. Burais, N., Foggia, A., Nicolas, A., Sabonnadiere, J. C.: Electromagnetic field formulation for eddy current calculations in nondestructive testing systems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 1058–1060, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carpenter, C. J.: Numerical solution of magnetic fields in the vicinity of current- carrying conductors. IEE Proceedings, 114, pp. 1793–1800, 1967.Google Scholar
  3. Chari, M. V. K., Csendes, Z. J.: Finite element analysis of the skin effect in current carrying conductors. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 13, pp. 1125–1127, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forghani, B., Lowther, D. A., Silvester, P. P., Stone, G. O.: Newton-Raphson finite element programs for axisymmetric vector fields. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2523–2526, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammond, P.: Use of potentials in calculation of electromagnetic fields. IEE Proceedings, 129, pt. A, pp. 106–112, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. Lavers, J. D.: Finite element solution of nonlinear two dimensional TE-mode eddy current problems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2201–2203, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mohammed, O. A, Demerdash, N. A., Nehl, T. W.: Validity of finite element formulation and solution of three dimensional magnetostatic problems in electrical devices with applications to transformers and reactors. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 1846–1853, 1984. Pillsbury, R. D., Jr.: A three dimensional eddy current formulation using two potentials: the magnetic vector potential and total magnetic scalar potential. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 19, pp. 2284–2247, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Polak, S. J., Wachters, A. J. H., van Welij, J. S.: A new 3–D eddy current model. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2447–2449, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Renew, D. C., Blake, S., Jacobs, D. A. H., Rutter, P.: A magnetostatic 2 ½- dimensional field calculation program for turbogenerators. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2317–2320, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rodger, D, Eastham, J. F.: A formulation for low frequency eddy current solutions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2443–2446, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tokumasu, T., Doi, S., Ito, K., Yamamoto, M.: An electric vector potential method approach for 3-D electromagnetic field in turbine generator stator core end. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAs-103, pp. 1330–1338, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Trowbridge, C. W.: Three–dimensional field computation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 293–297, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Problem Modelling and Mesh Construction

  1. Ancelle, B., Callagher, E., Masse, P.: ENTREE: a fully parametric preprocessor for computer aided design of magnetic devices. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 630–632, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkery, J. F., Barton, R. K., Konrad, A.: Automatic finite element grid generation for motor design analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1924–1926, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cendes, Z. J., Shenton, D., Shahnasser, H.: Magnetic field computation using Delaunay triangulation and complementary finite element methods. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2551–2554, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haber, R., Shephard, M. S., Abel, J. F., Gallagher, R. H., Greenberg, D. P.: A generalized graphic preprocessor for two-dimensional finite element analysis. Computer Graphics, 12, pp. 323–329, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Imafuku, I., Kodera, Y., Sayawaki, M., Kono, M.: A generalized automatic mesh generation scheme for the finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15, pp. 713–732, 1980.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lindholm, D. A.: Automatic triangular mesh generation on surfaces of polyhedra. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2539–2542, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Masse, Ph., Coulomb, J. L., Ancelle, B.: System design methodology in C.A.D. programs based on the finite element method. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 609–616, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Molfino, P., Molinari, G., Viviani, A.: A user oriented modular package for the solution of general field problems under time varying conditions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 638–643, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson, J. M.: A triangulation algorithm for arbitrary planar domains. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2, pp. 151–159, 1978.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pammer, Z.: A mesh refinement method for transient heat conduction problems solved by finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15, pp. 495–505, 1980.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Preis, K.: A contribution to eddy current calculations in plane and axisymmetric multiconductor systems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2397– 2400, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shephard, M. S., Gallagher, R. H., Abel, J. F.: The synthesis of near-optimum finite element meshes with interactive computer graphics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15, pp. 1021–1039, 1980.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sitaraman, V., Saxena, R. B.: Mesh grading in finite element analysis. Electric Machines and Power Systems, 8, pp. 33–43, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thacker, W. C.: A brief review of techniques for generating irregular computational grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15, pp. 1335–1341, 1980.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tracy, T. F.: Graphical pre- and post-processor for 2-dimensional finite element method programs. Computer Graphics, 11, pp. 8–12, 1977.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yildir, Y. B., Wexler, A.:MANDAP—a FEM/BEM data preparation package. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 19, pp. 2562–2564, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Field Problems in Magnetic Devices

  1. Ashtiani, C. N., Lowther, D. A.: Simulation of the transient and subtransient reactances of a large hydrogenerator by finite elements. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 1788–1794, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbero, V., Dal Mut, G., Grigoli, G., Santamaria, M.: Axisymmetric analysis and experimental measurements of magnetic field in the end region of a turbine generator. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 19, pp. 2623–2627, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton, M. L.: Loss calculation in laminated steel utilizing anisotropic magnetic permeability. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-99, pp. 1280–1287, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiampi, M., Negro, A. L., Tartaglia, M.: Alternating electromagnetic field computation in laminated cores. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 1530–1536, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demerdash, N. A., Nehl, T. W.: Use of numerical analysis of nonlinear eddy current problems by finite elements in the determination of parameters of electrical machines with solid iron rotors. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-15, pp. 1482–1484, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demerdash, N. A., Nehl, T. W., Fouad, F. A., Arkadan, A. A.: Analysis of the magnetic field in rotating armature electrically commutated dc machines by finite elements. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 1829–1836, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desserre, J. R., Marrocco, A.: Simulation of the writing process using finite element and augmented Lagrangian methods. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 238–241, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. di Napoli, A., Paggi, R.: A model of anisotropic grain–oriented steel. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 1557–1561, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foggia, A., Sabonnadière, J. C., Silvester, P.: Finite element solution of saturated travelling magnetic field problems. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-94, pp. 866–871, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammond, P., Tsiboukis, T. D.: Dual finite-element calculations for static electric and magnetic fields. I EE Proceedings, 130, pt. A, pp. 105–111, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. Hanalla, A. Y., Macdonald, D. C.: A nodal method for the numerical solution of transient field problems in electrical machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-11, pp. 1544–1546, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanalla, A. Y., Macdonald, D. C.: Numerical analysis of transient field problems in electrical machines. IEE Proceedings, MAG-123, pp. 893–898, 1976.Google Scholar
  13. Koehler, T. R.: Self-consistent vector calculation of magnetic recording using the finite element method. Journal of Applied Physics, 55, pp. 2214–2216, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Konrad, A.: Integrodifferential finite element formulation of two–dimensional steady–state skin effect problems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 284–292, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koshimoto, Y., Mikazuki, T.: High output reproduction characteristics of film heads. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 1134–1136, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lefranc, C., Feliachi, M., Coulomb, J. L.: On numerical modelling of hysteresis in recording systems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1891–1893, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luetke-Daldrup, B.: Comparison of exact and approximate finite-element solution of the two–dimensional nonlinear eddy-current problem with measurements. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1936–1938, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacBain, J. A.: Magnetic field simulation from a voltage source. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2180–2182, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Minnich, S. H., Tandon, S. C., Atkinson, D. R.: Comparison of two methods for modeling large-signal alternating magnetic fields using finite-elements. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 2953–2960, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naito, T., Okada, T., Naito, T., Moriyasu, S.: Analysis of damper winding current of synchronous generator due to space subharmonic M.M.F. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2643–2646, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakata, T., Takahashi, N., Kawase, Y., Nakano, M.: Influence of lamination orientation and stacking on magnetic characteristics of grain–oriented silicon steel laminations. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1774–1776, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicolas, A., Sabonnadiere, J. C., Silvester, P. P.: Three-dimensional solution of high-speed magnetic levitation problems. Journal of Applied Physics, 53, pp. 8417–8419, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nomura, T., Nakamura, S., Uda, S., Iwamoto, M., Okada, M.: Finite element analysis of operational impedance of superconducting alternators. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2608–2610, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okuda, H., Abukawa, T., Arai, K., Ito, M.: Characteristics of ring permanent magnet bearing. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1693–1695, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmer, D. C., McDaniel, T. W.: Spurious signal pickup from the outer rails of a ferrite recording head. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 912–914, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pearson, R. F., Knowles, J. E.: Application of MAGGY2 to short wavelength recording. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 3456–3458, 1983.Google Scholar
  27. Potter, P. G., Cambrell, G. K.: A combined finite element and loop analysis for nonlinearly interacting magnetic fields and circuits. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2352–2355, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reece, A. B. J., Khan, G. K. M., Chant, M. J.: Generator parameter prediction: finite-element simulation of the variable–frequency injection test. GEC Journal of Science and Technology, 49, pp. 13–17, 1983.Google Scholar
  29. Sarma, M. S., Stahl, P., Ward, A.: Magnetic–field analysis of ferrofiuidic seals for optimum design. Journal of Applied Physics, 55, pp. 2595–2597, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sawada, T., Sakuma, T., Yoneda, K.: Yoke type MR head on perpendicular double layer media. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 857–859, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shinagawa, K., Fujiwara, H., Kugiya, F., Okuwaki, T., Kudo, M.: Simulation of perpendicular recording on Co-Cr media with a thin Permalloy film-ferrite composite head. Journal of Applied Physics, 55, pp. 2585–2587, 1984.Google Scholar
  32. Silvester, P., Haslam, C. R. S.: Magneto telluric modelling by the finite element method. Geophysical Prospecting, 20, pp. 872–891, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silvester, P., Konrad, A., Coulomb, J. L., Sabonnadiere, J. C.: Modal network representation of slot-embedded conductors. Electric Machines and Electromechanics, 1, pp. 107–122, 1977.Google Scholar
  34. Silvester, P. P., Lowther, D. A., Carpenter, C. J., Wyatt, E. A.: Exterior finite elements for 2-dimensional field problems. I EE Proceedings, 124, pp. 1267–1270, 1977.Google Scholar
  35. Simkin, J., Trowbridge, C. W.: On the use of the total scalar potential in the numerical solution of field problems in electromagnetics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 14, pp. 423–440, 1979.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tandon, S. C.: Finite element analysis of induction machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 1722–1724, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tandon, S. C., Armor, A. F., Chari, M. V. K.: Nonlinear transient finite element field computation for electrical machines and devices. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-102, pp. 1089–1095, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner, P. J., MacDonald, D. C.: Finite element prediction of steady state operation of a turbine-generator using conductivity matrices. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 3262–3264, 1983.Google Scholar
  39. Williamson, S., Ralph, J. W.: Finite-element analysis of an induction motor fed from a constant-voltage source. IEE Proceedings, 130, pt. B, pp. 18–24, 1983.Google Scholar
  40. Williamson, S. J., Ralph, J. W.: Finite element analysis for nonlinear magnetic field problems with complex current sources. IEE Proceedings, 129, pt. A, pp. 391–395, 1982.Google Scholar
  41. Yamada, S., Kanamaru, Y., Bessho, K.: The transient magnetization process and operations in the plunger type electromagnet. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics; MAG-12, pp. 1056–1058, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamada, H., Fujibayashi, K., Ito, K., Nakano, M., Kanai, H.: Calculation of loss in solid-salient-pole machine. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 1355–1362, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Postprocessing Operations in CAD

  1. Ashtiani, C. N., Lwther, D. A.: The use of finite elements in the simulation of the steady state operation of synchronous generator with unknown terminal loading condition. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2381–2384, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashtiani, C. N., Lwther, D. A.: The use of finite elements in the simulation of the steady state operation of synchronous generator with unknown terminal loading condition. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2381–2384, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. Ashtiani, C. N., Lwther, D. A.: The simulation of the steady-state reactances of a large water-wheel generator by finite elements. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 1781–1787, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baden Fuller, A. J., dos Santos, M. L. X.: New method for the display of three-dimensional vector fields. IEE Proceedings, 127, pt. A, pp. 435–442, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. Bhargava, S. C.: Negative–sequence currents, losses, and temperature rise in the rotor of a turbogenerator during transient unbalanced operation. Electric Machines and Power Systems, 8, pp. 155–168, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biedinger, M.-M., Kant, M.: On the optimization of magnetic field sources in electromechanical energy conversion. Journal of Applied Physics, 53, pp. 7061–7070, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, P., Chari, M. V. K., D’Angelo, J.: Three–dimensional finite element solution of permanent magnet machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-17, pp. 2997–2999, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulomb, J. L.: A methodology for the determination of global electromechanical quantities from a finite element analysis and its application to the evaluation of magnetic forces, torques and stiffness. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2514–2519, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coulomb, J. L., Meunier, G.: Finite element implementation of virtual work principle for magnetic or electric force and torque computation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1894–1896, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson, G. E., Eastham, A. R., Ong, R.: Computer-aided design studies of the homopolar linear synchronous motor. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20 pp. 1927–1929, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demerdash, N. A., Fouad, F. A., Nehl, T. W.: Determination of winding inductances in ferrite type permanent magnet electric machinery by finite elements. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 1052–1054, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Napoli, A.: Induction machine equivalent network parameters computation from electrical and magnetic fields analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-15, pp. 1470–1472, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dougherty, J. W., Minnich, S. H.: Operational inductances of turbine generators, test data versus finite–element calculations. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-102, pp. 3393–3404, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eastham, J. F., Rodger, D.: The performance of induction levitators. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1684–1686, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flores, J. C., Buckley, G. W., McPherson, G., Jr.: The effects of saturation on the armature leakage reactance of large synchronous machines. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 593–600, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helszajn, J., Baars, R. D., Nisbet, W. T.: Characteristics of circulators using planar triangular and disk resonators loaded with magnetic ridges. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-28, pp. 616–621, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howe, D., Low, W. F.: Design and dynamic calculations for miniature permanent magnet stepper motors. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1768–1770, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobus, A., Muller, W.: Numerical solution of forces and torques. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2589–2592, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kincaid, T. G., Chari, M. V. K.: The application of finite element method analysis to eddy current nondestructive evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-15 pp. 1956–1960, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Konrad, A.: Linear accelerator cavity field calculation by the finite element method. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, NS-20, pp. 802–808, 1973.Google Scholar
  21. Lowther, D., McFee, S., Sabourin, R.: Some aspects of the computer aided design of recording heads. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1980–1982, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Minnich, S. H., Chari, M. V. K., Berkery, J. F.: Operational impedances of turbine-generators by the finite-element method. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-102, pp. 20–27, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naito, T., Matsuki, J., Okada, T., Uenosono, C.: Analysis of damper winding currents in salient–pole generator taking into account the magnetic saturation. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 102, pp. 107–114, 1980.Google Scholar
  24. Nakata, T.: Numerical analysis of flux and loss distributions in electrical machinery. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1750–1755, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nassif, N., Silvester, P. P.: Graphic representations of three-component vector fields. Computer-Aided Design, 12, pp. 289–294, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palanisamy, R., Lord, W.: Prediction of eddy current signals for nondestructive testing of condenser tubing. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2213–2215, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Palka, R.: Application of the finite element technique to continuation problems of stationary fields. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2356–2359, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penman, J., Fraser, J. R., Smith, J. R., Grieve, M. D.: Complementary energy methods in the computation of electrostatic fields. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2288–2291, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piriou, F., Razek, A.: Calculation of saturated inductances for numerical simulation of synchronous machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2628–2631, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rafinejad, P., Sabonnadiere, J. C.: Finite element computer programs in design of electromagnetic devices. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-12, pp. 575–578, 1976.Google Scholar
  31. Rajanathan, C. B., Lowther, D. A., Freeman, E. M.: Finite–element analysis of the Xi-core levitator. IEE Proceedings, 131, pp. 62–66, 1984.Google Scholar
  32. Silvester, P., Konrad, A.: Analysis of transformer leakage phenomena by high-order finite elements. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS92, pp. 1843–1855, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Szczech, T. J., Perry, D. M., Palmquist, K. E.: Improved field equations for ring heads. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 1740–1744, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strangas, E. M., Hamilton, H. B.: A model for the chopper controlled dc series motor. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-102, pp. 1403–1407, 1983.Google Scholar
  35. Takeda, Y., Yagisawa, T., Suyama, A., Yamamoto, M.: Application of magnetic wedges to large motors. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1780–1782, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yamada, H., Fujibayashi, K.: Torque of solid salient pole machine by finite element method. Journal of Applied Physics, 53, pp. 8375–8377, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weiss, J., Garg, V. K., Sternheim, E.: Eddy current loss calculation in multicon– ductor systems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2207–2209, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Postprocessing Systems for Magnetics

  1. Barton, R. K., Konrad, A., Berkery, J. F.: Finite element postprocessing for direct current machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-20, pp. 1798–1800, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lowther, D. A., Silvester, P. P., Freeman, E. M.: The use of interactive postprocessing in the design of electromagnetic devices. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-16, pp. 803–805, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lowther, D. A., Silvester, P. P., Freeman, E. M., Rea, K., Trowbridge,C. W., Newman, M., Simkin, J.: Ruthless—a general purpose finite element postprocessor. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-17, pp. 3402–3404, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lowther, D., Rea, K., Silvester, P., Freeman, E., Trowbridge, C., Simkin, J., Newman, M.: A stack configured vector calculator for electromagnetic field evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 627–629, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lowther, D. A., Forghani, B.: Interactive postprocessing techniques for electromagnetic field analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2168–2170, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CAD Systems Present and Future

  1. Andersen, O. W.: Transformer leakage flux program based on finite element method. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-92, pp. 682–689, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, A. G. A. M., Biddlecombe, C. S.: The PE2D package for transient eddy current analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 411–415, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biddlecombe, C. S., Edwards, C. B., Shaw, M. J.: Use of the computer code PE2D in the electrostatic modelling of an electron-beam-generator/vacuum-diode interface. IEE Proceedings, 129, pt. A, pp. 337–339, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. Biddlecombe, C. S., Simkin, J.: Enhancements to the PE2D package. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2635–2638, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brauer, J. R.: Finite element calculation of eddy currents and skin effects. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 504–509, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coulomb, J. L.: A simple interactive finite element processor for teaching purposes. Journal of Applied Physics, 53, pp. 8417–8419, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csendes, Z. J., Freeman, E. M., Lowther, D. A., Silvester, P. P.: Interactive computer graphics in magnetic field analysis and electric machine design. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-100, pp. 2862–2869, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Beer, A., Polak, S. J., Wachters, A. J. H., van Welij, J. S.: The use of PADDY for the solution of 3-D magnetostatic problems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 617–619, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diserens, N. J.: A space charge beam option for the PE2D and TOSCA packages. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 362–366, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Girgis, R. S., Yannucci, D. A., Templeton, J. B.: Performance parameters of power transformers using 3-D magnetic field calculations. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-103, pp. 2708–2713, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoburg, J. F., Davis, J. L.: A student-oriented finite element program for electrostatic potential problems. IEEE Transactions on Education, E-26, pp. 138–142, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. Konrad, A., Silvester, P.: Scalar finite-element program package for two dimensional field problems. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-19, pp. 952–954, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Konrad, A.: A linear accelerator cavity code based on the finite element method. Computer Physics Communications, 13, pp. 349–362, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lari, R. J., Turner, L. R.: Survey of eddy current programs. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2474–21477, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lowther, D. A.: A microprocessor based electromagnetic field analysis system. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 351–356, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacNeal, R. H., McCormick, C. W.: The NASTRAN computer program for structural analysis. Computers and Structures, 1, pp. 389–412, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pillsbury, R. D., Jr.: NMLMAP—a two dimensional finite element program for transient or static linear or nonlinear magnetic field problems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 406–410, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pissanetzky, S.: Solution of three–dimensional, anisotropic, nonlinear problems of magnetostatics using two scalar potentials, finite and infinite multipolar elements and automatic mesh generation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 346–350, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Polak, S. J., de Beer, A., Wachters, A., van Welij, J. S.: MAGGY2, a program package for two-dimensional magnetostatic problems. International Journal on Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15, pp. 113–128, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sabonnadidre, J. C., Meunier, G., Morel, B.: FLUX: a general interactive finite elements package for 2D electromagnetic fields. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-18, pp. 624–626, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simkin, J., Trowbridge, C. W.: Electromagnetics CAD using a single user machine (SUM). IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2655–2658, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spence, R., Apperley, M.: The interactive-graphic man-computer dialogue in computer-aided circuit design. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, CAS-24, pp. 49–61, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tual, J. P.: 2-D computation problems in magnetic recording and printing. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-19, pp. 2486–2490, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Lowther
    • 1
  • P. P. Silvester
    • 1
  1. 1.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations