Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neue Trends in der Schockforschung

  • Conference paper
Stand und Gegenstand chirurgischer Forschung

Zusammenfassung

Solange noch Patienten im Schock oder an dessen Folgen versterben, bleibt die Schockforschung Aufgabe der experimentellen Chirurgie im weitesten Sinne. In den letzten Jahren wurde klar erkennbar, daß der Pathomechanismus derjenigen Veränderungen, die in der Zeit zwischen erfolgreicher Primärtherapie nach dem Schockereignis und der klinischen Manifestation von Funktionsstörungen einzelner Organe bis hin zum Multiorganversagen auftreten, nur aufzuklären sein wird, wenn neue, die Fächer der Grundlagen- und angewandten Forschung übergreifende Forschungskonzepte entwickelt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Baumgartner JD, Glauser MP, McCutchan JA, Ziegler EJ, Melle G van, Klauber MR, Vogt M et al (1985) Prevention of gram-negative shock and death in surgical patients by antibody to endotoxin core glycolipid. Lancet 1:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Maestro RF (1980) An approach to free radicals in medicine and biology. Acta Physiol Scand[Suppl] 492:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  3. Funk W, Intaglietta M (1983) Spontaneous arteriolar vasomotion. Prog Appl Microcirc 3: 66–82

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gaffin FL, Lachman E (1984) The use of anti-LPS antibodies in the management of septic shock. Southafrican J Med 65:158–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerdin B, Arfors KE, Schoenberg MH (1984) Die pathophysiologische Bedeutung freier Sauerstoffradikale. In: Meßmer K (Hrsg) Angiodynamik und Angiopathie. Zuckschwerdt, München, S 33–50

    Google Scholar 

  6. Intaglietta M (1984) Spontane arterioläre Vasomotion. In: Meßmer K (Hrsg) Angiodynamik und Angiopathie. Zuckschwerdt, München, S 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Intaglietta M, Messmer K (1983) Editorial: Microangiodynamics, peripheral vascular resistance and the normal microcirculation. Int J Microcirc: Clin Exp 2:3–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis DH, Del Maestro R, Arfors KE (eds) (1980) Free radicals medicine and biology. Acta Physiol Scand [Suppl] 492:1–168

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meßmer K (1982) Pathophysiologie des septischen Patienten. Intensivmed Notfallmed Anästh 37:12–26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Messmer K (1985) Septic shock: pathophysiology and clinical features. Intensivmed Notfallmed Anästh 52:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meßmer K, Sunder-Plassmann L (1975) Schock. In: Lindenschmidt TO (Hrsg) Pathophysiologische Grundlagen der Chirurgie. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 159–196

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meßmer K, Intaglietta M (1986) Die physiologische Bedeutung der arteriolären Vasomotion. In: Trübestein G (Hrsg) Periphere arterielle Verschlußkrankheit. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 10–15

    Google Scholar 

  13. Messmer K, Funk W, Endrich B, Zeintl H (1984) The perspectives of new methods in microcirculation research. Prog Appl Microcirc 6:77–90

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pryor WA (1976) The role of free radical reactions in biological systems. In: Pryor WA (ed) Free radicals in biology, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruiz-Morales M, Schwarz M, Fujita Y, Messmer K (1984) Shock endotoxico “hiperdinamico” en el cerdo. III. Congreso Nacional de la S.E.I.Q., September 19–22, Granada/Spain

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ruiz-Morales M, Kreimeier U, Schwarz M, Lindberg A, Messmer K (1985) Hemodynamics and regional blood flow during hyperdynamic endotoxinemia. 31th Congress Internat Soc of Surg, Paris, 1–6 September

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schoenberg MH, Muhl E, Sellin D, Younes M, Schildberg FW, Haglund U (1984) Posthypo-tensive generation of superoxide free radicals — possible role in the pathogenesis of the intestinal mucosal damage. Acta Chir Scand 150:301–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Teng NNH, Kaplan HS, Hebert JM, Moore C, Douglas H, Wunderlich A, Braude AI (1985) Protection against gram-negative bacteremia and endotoxemia with human monoclonal IgM antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:1790–1794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward PA (1983) Role of toxic oxygen products from phagocytic cells in tissue injury. Adv Shock Res 10:27–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolf I, McCutchan A, Ziegler F, Braude AI (1979) Prophylactic antibody to core LPS in neutropenic patients. Proc 11th Int Con Chemother 19th Intersc Conf Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 19:65

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zeintl H, Funk W, Endrich B, Messmer K (1985) CAMAS — a computer assisted microcirculation analysis system. Int J Microcirc: Clin Exp 4:92

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zeintl H, Tompkins WR, Messmer K, Intaglietta M (1986) Static and dynamic microcirculatory video image analysis applied to clinical investigations. Prog Appl Microcirc 11:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ziegler EJ, McCutchan A, Fierer J, Glauser MP, Sadoff JC, Douglas H, Braude AI (1982) Treatment of gramnegative bacteremia and shock with human antiserum to a mutant Escherichia coli. N Engl J Med 307:1225–1230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zinner S, McCabe W (1976) Effects of IgM and IgG antibody in patients with bacteremia due to gramnegative bacilli. J Infect Dis 133:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. K. Messmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Zeintl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Kreimeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Schoenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Essen, Deutschland

    F. W. Eigler

  2. Göttingen, Deutschland

    H.-J. Peiper

  3. Lübeck, Deutschland

    F. W. Schildberg

  4. Augsburg, Deutschland

    J. Witte

  5. Bochum, Deutschland

    V. Zumtobel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Messmer, K., Zeintl, H., Kreimeier, U., Schoenberg, M. (1986). Neue Trends in der Schockforschung. In: Eigler, F.W., Peiper, HJ., Schildberg, F.W., Witte, J., Zumtobel, V. (eds) Stand und Gegenstand chirurgischer Forschung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70648-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70648-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70649-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70648-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation