Apical K+ Channels in Frog Skin: A Pathway for K+ Excretion

  • W. Van Driessche
  • W. Zeiske
Part of the Proceedings in Life Sciences book series (LIFE SCIENCES)


Since several decennia, the transport of Na+ across the epithelium of frog skin has been the subject of numerous studies (Lindemann and Voûte 1976). Particularly, special interest was given to the mechanisms involved in uptake of Na+ across the apical barrier, which was found to be the rate limiting step in Na+ translocation from the mucosal to serosal compartment (Biber and Curran 1970). It was generally accepted that the apical membranes were mainly permeable for Na+ and did not display a measurable permeability for K+ (Koefoed-Johnsen and Ussing 1958). Recently, we found that the apical cell membranes of the skin of frog species Rana temporaria have also a significant K+ conductance (Zeiske and Van Driessche 1979). However, the permeability for K+ varied enormously among frogs. This might have been the reason for the ignorance about this pathway during several decades of investigations of the frog skin epithelium.


Apical Membrane Corner Frequency Local Electrical Field Noise Analysis Blockable Current 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Biber TUL, Curran PF (1970) Direct measurement of uptake of sodium at the outer surface of the frog skin. J Gen Physiol 56:83–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frazier LW, Vanatta JC (1981) Excretion of K+ by frog skin with rate varying with K+ load. Comp Biochem Physiol 69A:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gögelein H, Van Driessche W (1981) Noise analysis of the K+ current through the apical membrane of Necturus gallbladder. J Membr Biol 60:187–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Helman SI, Fisher RS (1977) Microelectrode studies of the active Na transport pathway of frog skin. J Gen Physiol 69:571–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koefoed-Johnsen V, Ussing HH (1958) The nature of the frog skin potential. Acta Physiol Scand 42:298–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Latorre R, Miller C (1983) Conduction and selectivity in potassium channels. J Membr Biol 71: 11–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lindemann B, Van Driessche W (1978) The mechanism of Na-uptake through Na-selective channels in the epithelium of frog skin. In: Hoffmann JF (ed) Membrane transport processes, vol 1. Raven, New York, p 155–178Google Scholar
  8. Lindemann B, Voûte C (1976) Structure and function of the epidermis. In: Llinas R, Precht W (ed) Frog neurobiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 169–210Google Scholar
  9. Nagel W (1977) The dependence of the electrical potentials across the membranes of the frog skin upon the concentration of sodium in the mucosal solution. J Physiol 269:777–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagel W (1980) Rheogenic sodium transport in a tight epithelium, the amphibian skin. J Physiol 302:281–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nagel W, Hirschmann W (1980) K+-permeability of the outer border of the frog skin (R. temporaria). J Membr Biol 52:107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Neumcke B (1978) 1/f noise in membranes. Biophys Struct Mech 4:179–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nielsen R (1984) Active transepithelial potassium transport in frog skin via specific potassium channels in the apical membrane. Acta Physiol Scand 120:287–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rick R, Dörge A, Von Arnim E, Thurau K (1978) Electron microprobe analysis of frog skin epithelium: evidence for a syncytial sodium transport compartment J Membr Biol 39:313–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tang J, Abramcheck FJ, Van Driessche W, Helman SI (1985) Electrophysiology and noise analysis of K+-depolarized epithelial of frog skin. Am J Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Van Driessche W (1983) Outward K+ currents through frog skin. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 91: P83–P85Google Scholar
  17. Van Driessche W (1984) Physiological role of apical potassium ion channels in frog skin. J Physiol 356:79–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Driessche W, Erlij D (1983) Noise analysis of inward and outward Na+ currents across the apical border of ouabain-treated frog skin. Pflügers Arch 398:179–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Driessche W, Gullentops K (1982) Conductance fluctuation analysis in epithelia. In: Baker PF (ed) Techniques in the life sciences, Techniques in cellular physiology, vol 2. Elsevier, Biomedical, P 123, p 1–13Google Scholar
  20. Van Driessche W, Lindemann B (1978) Low-noise amplification of voltage and current fluctuations arising in epithelia. Rev Sci Instrum 49:52–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Driessche W, Zeiske W (1980a) Ba2+-induced conductance fluctuations of spontaneously fluctuating K+ channels in the apical membrane of frog skin (Rana temporaria). J Membr Biol 56: 31–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Driessche W, Zeiske W (1980b) Spontaneous fluctuations of potassium channels in the apical membrane of frog skin. J Physiol 299:101–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeiske W, Van Driessche W (1979) Saturable K+ pathway across the outer border of frog skin (Rana temporaria): kinetics and inhibition by Cs+ and other cations. J Membr Biol 47:77–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zeiske W, Van Driessche W (1981) Apical K+ channels in frog skin (Rana temporaria): cation adsorption and voltage influence gating kinetics. Pflügers Arch 390:22–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zeiske W, Van Driessche W (1983) The interaction of “K+-like” cations with the apical K+ channel in frog skin. J Membr Biol 76:57–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Van Driessche
    • 1
  • W. Zeiske
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratorium voor FysiologieK.U.L.LeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Institut für Tierphysiologie und Angewandte ZoologieFreien Universität BerlinBerlin 41Germany

Personalised recommendations