Abstract
In the perspective of decision aid, modelling activity (process) has substantially two roles: firstly in helping to comprehend, by mastering the various possible actions and by the reflections it gives to preexisting preferences, and secondly in contributing to the formation and evolution of the preferences of the decision maker(s) (DM) on stage so as to make acceptable or discover possibilities which were previously refused or not considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bona, B., Giorgi, N., Minini, U., Orlando, E. and Ostanello, A., ‘An application of a multicriteria method to a diagnosis of public services in homogeneous areas of a town’, (in Italian), Part I and Part II, Quaderni di Lavoro, no. 2,3, Politecnico di Torino, Gruppo R.O., 1976.
Hansen, P., Anciaux, M. and Vincke, P., ‘Quasi-kernels of outranking relations’, in: Thiriez, H. and Zionts, S. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 30, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976, pp. 53–62.
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., ‘How we can use the notion of semi-orders to build outranking relations in multicriteria decision making’, ir.: Wendt, D. and Vlek, C. (eds), Utility, Subjective Probability and Decision Making, Wiley, 1975.
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E. and Siskos, J., Méthode de Décision Multicritère, Editions Hommes et Techniques, Boulogne-Billancourt, 1983.
Montgolfier, P. de and Bertier, P., Approche Multicritère des Problèmes de Décision, Editions Hommes et Techniques, Suresnes, 1978.
Moscarola, J. and Roy, B., ‘Procédure automatique d’examen de dossiers fondée sur un classement trichotomique en présence de critères multiples’, RAIRO Recherche Opérationnelle, 22 (2), 1977.
Roy, B., ‘Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples, (Le méthode ELECTRE)’, RIRO, 2, no. 8, 1968, pp. 57–75.
Roy, B., ‘La méthode ELECTRE II’, METRA, Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, No. 142, 1971.
Roy, B., ‘How outranking relation helps multiple criteria decision making’, in: Cochrane, J.L. and Zeleny, M. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, SC, 1973, pp. 179–201.
Roy, B., ‘Critères multiples et modélisation des préférences: l’apport des relations de surclassement’, Revue d’Economie Politique, 84, (1), 1974, pp. 1–44.
Roy, B., ‘Vers une méthodologie générale d’aide à la décision’, Revue METRA, XIV, (3), 1975.
Roy, B.,‘Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: the fuzzy outranking concept’, in: Bell, D., Keeney, R. and Raiffa, H. (eds), Conflicting Objectives in Decision, Wiley, New York, 1977, pp. 40–74.
Roy, B., ‘ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples’, Cahiers Centre Etudes Recherche Opérationnelle, 20, (1), 1979, pp. 3–24.
Roy, B., ‘Extension of the dominance concept: theoretical background and application’, Communication to the 12th Meeting of the EURO Working Group ‘Multicriteria Decision Aid’, Bochum, October 1980.
Roy, B. and Bertier, P., ‘La méthode ELECTRE II, une application au media-planning’, in: Ross, M. (ed), OR’72, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1973, pp. 291–302.
Roy, B. and Hugonnard, J.C., ‘Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris Metro System by a multicriteria method’, Transport Research, 16A, (4), 1982, pp. 301–312.
Roy, B. and Vincke, Ph., ‘Systèmes relationnels de préférences en présence de critères multiples avec seuils’, Cahiers Centre Etude Recherche Opérationnelle, 22 (1), 1980a.
Roy, B. and Vincke, Ph., ‘Pseudo-critères et systèmes relationnels de préférence: nouveaux concepts et nouveaux résultats en vue de l’aide à la décision’, Cahiers du LAMSADE, Université de Paris Dauphine, No. 28, 1980b.
Roy, B. and Vincke, Ph., ‘Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions’, European Journal of Operational Research, 8, 1981, pp. 207–218.
Siskos, J., ‘Comment modéliser les préférences au moyen de fonctions d’utilité additives’, RAIRO Recherche Opérationnelle, 14, 1980, pp. 53–82.
Siskos, J., ‘A way to deal with fuzzy preferences in multi-criteria decision problems’, European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 1982, pp. 314–324.
Vincke, Ph., ‘Quasi-kernels to minimum weakness in a graph’, Discrete Mathematics, 20, (2), 1977.
Zadeh, L.A., Fu, K.S., Tanaka, K. and Shimura, M., Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ostanello, A. (1985). Outranking Methods. In: Fandel, G., Spronk, J. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70583-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70583-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70585-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70583-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive