Advertisement

Urodynamics pp 95-101 | Cite as

The Reproducibility of the Pressure-Flow Relationship in the Normal Upper Urinary Tract of the Pig

  • J. Mortensen
  • J. C. Djurhuus
  • S. Bisballe
  • H. Laursen
Conference paper

Abstract

The widespread use of reconstructive surgery in the management of upper urinary tract dilatations has created a need for diagnostic procedures by which it will be possible to discriminate between a stable and a progressive dilatation. In 1965 clinical use of urodynamics in the upper urinary tract was introduced (Bácklund et al. 1965). The theory of the investigation was that an obstructed system would show a high pressure response to a given flow rate in contrast to a non-obstructed system. Later the method was standardized with regard to flow rate and normal ranges were outlined (Whitaker 1973). In the following years several reports in favour of using this urodynamic test were published (Pfister 1982; Whitaker 1978, 1982). Unfortunately documentation of the predictive value of this method is still not available. On the contrary several reports question its value. Clinical investigations have shown that a low pressure response system may exist in spite of progressive disease (Coolsaet et al. 1980; Djurhuus et al. 1982) and that a high pressure response may be present in spite of stable kidney function (Kinn 1981). Experimental investigations have shown that the normal range of pressures in the multicalyceal system of the pig clearly exceeds the clinically accepted normal range (Mortensen et al. 1983), and furthermore do partial experimental obstructions not always exhibit an obstructive pressure flow response in spite of progressive disease (Koff and Thrall 1981).

Keywords

Renal Pelvis Pressure Flow Baseline Pressure Pressure Flow Study Urinary Tract Dilatation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäcklund L, Grotte G, Reuterskjöld A (1965) Functional stenosis as a cause of pelviureteric obstruction and hydronephrosis. Arch Dis Childh 40:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyarsky S, Labay P, Teague N (1978) Aperistaltic ureter in upper urinary tract infection —cause or effect. Urology 12:134–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coolsaet BLRA, Griffiths DJ, Mastrigt R van, Duyl WA van (1980) Urodynamic investigation of the wide ureter. J Urol 124:666–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Djurhuus JC, Jørgensen TM, Nørgaard JP, Nerstrøm B, Hvid-Hansen H (1982) Constant perfusion provocation in idiopathic hydronephrosis. Urology 19:611–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gosling JA, Dixon JS (1978) Functional obstruction of the ureter and renal pelvis. A histological and electron microscopic study. Br J Urol 50:145–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kinn AC (1981) Pressure flow studies in hydronephrosis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 15:249–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koff SA, Thrall JH (1981) Diagnosis of obstruction in experimental hydroureteronephrosis. Urology 17:570–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mortensen J, Djurhuus JC (1985) Hydrodynamics of the normal multicalyceal pyeloureter in pigs. The pelvic pressure response to increasing flow rates, its normal ranges and intraindividual variations. Invest Urol (to be published)Google Scholar
  9. Mortensen J, Djurhuus JC, Laursen H, Bisballe S (1983) The relationship between pressure and flow in the normal pig renal pelvis. An experimental study of the range of normal pressures. Scand J Urol Nephrol 17:369–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mortensen J, Frøkiaer J, Tofft HP, Djurhuus JC (1984) Renal pelvis pressure flow relationship in pigs after transsections of the ureter. Scand J Urol Nephrol 18:329–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pfister RC (1982) Pressure flow studies II. In:O’Reilly PH, Gosling JA (eds) Idiopathic hydronephrosis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 68–78Google Scholar
  12. Ripley SH, Somerville JYF (1982) Whitaker revisited. Br J Urol 54:594–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thachil JV, Struthers NW (1983) Does perfusion equal diuresis in the upper urinary tract. Br J Urol 55:133–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weiss RM, Biancani P (1981) Clinical implications of ureteral physiology. In:Susset J (ed) Female incontinence. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 399–403Google Scholar
  15. Whitaker RH (1973) Methods of assessing obstruction in dilated ureters. Br J Urol 45:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Whitaker RH (1978) Clinical assessment of pelvic and ureteral function. Urology 12:146–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitaker RH (1982) Pressure flow studies I. In:O’Reilly PH, Gosling JA (eds) Idiopathic hydronephrosis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 62–67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Mortensen
    • 1
  • J. C. Djurhuus
    • 1
  • S. Bisballe
    • 1
  • H. Laursen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Experimental Clinical ResearchUniversity of Aarhus, Aarhus County HospitalAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations