Advertisement

Primary Colorectal Cancer

  • Alain Weissman
  • Jacques Grellet
  • Michel Clot

Abstract

The traditionally described characteristic appearances of colorectal Carcinoma (ulceration and neoplasic stenosis) actually correspond to advanced lesions. In 1962, Potet et al. [8] had the insight to suggest a hypothetical relationship between malignant adenomas and ulcerative Carcinoma. This hypothesis is now accepted by most authors [3, 7]. Macroscopically, the change from malignant polyp to vegetative infiltrating and ulcerative Carcinoma is perfectly conceivable and can be explained by the necrosis frequently associated with malignant tumors (Fig. 4.1). This evolution has been confirmed numerous times by studies of polyps which have developed into common Carcinoma [2–9]. Consequently, the study of radiologic appearances of colorectal cancer has three parts: (1) nonspecific radiologic images of sessile or pedunculated lesions where only a histologic study will diagnose their benign or malignant nature: (2) radiologic signs indicating the malignant nature of a polyp; and (3) the radiologic appearance of more advanced cancers.

Keywords

Primary Colorectal Cancer Double Contrast Malignant Nature Basal Indentation Malignant Polyp 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ament AE, Alfidi RJ, Sridharrag P (1982) Basal indentation of sessile polypoid lesions: a function of geometry rather than a sign of malignancy. Radiology 143: 341–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekelund G, Lindstrom C, Rosengren JE (1974) Appearance and growth of early Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Acta Radiol 15: 670–679Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fenoglio CM, Nathan L (1973) The anatomic precursor of colorectal Carcinoma. JAMA 231: 640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Figiel LS, Figiel SJ, Wietersen FK(1965) Roentgenologic observations of growth rates of colonic polyps and Carcinoma. Acta Radiol 13: 417–429Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kelvin FM, Gardiner R, Vas W, Stevenson GW (1981) Colorectal Carcinoma missed on double contrast barium enema study: a problem in perception. Am J Radiol 137: 307–313Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morson BC, Dawson IMP (1979) Gastrointestinal pathology. 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford pp 648–680Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morson BC (1976) Genesis of colorectal cancer. Clinics Gastroenterol 5: 505–525Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Potet F, Soullard J, Lambling A (1962) Polypes et cancers du rectosigmoide, étude critique de la notion de dégénérescence et hypothèse de filiation. Presse Med 70: 865–868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soullard J, Potet F (1975) La prévention des cancers recto coliques. Arch Fr Mal App Dig 64: 197–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weissman A, Grellet J (1977) Rôle prépondérant du radiologiste dans la prevention du cancer rectocolique par le dépistage des polypes. J Radiol Electrol 58: 193–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weissman A, Riehe MC, Clot M, Grellet J (1978) Intérêt du lavement en double contraste (mucographie) dans le bilan pré opératoire du cancer rectocolique (résultats préliminaires). Journées Francophones de Gastroentérologie - jan 1978 - ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Welin S, Welin G (1976) The double contrast examination of the colon. Experiences with the Welin modiflcations. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alain Weissman
    • 1
  • Jacques Grellet
    • 1
  • Michel Clot
    • 2
  1. 1.Service Central de RadiologieGroupe Hospitalier Pitie-SalpétriereParis Cedex 13France
  2. 2.Clinique du CastelEaubonneFrance

Personalised recommendations