Abstract
Medical technology has improved at a staggering pace and obstetrics is one of the fields most affected by this progress. Since its introduction in 1958 (Caldeyro-Barcia 1958) fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring has become a widely used modality. It is estimated (Hobbins et al. 1979) that the technique is used in over half the deliveries in the United States. Recent investigations (1982) revealed that in Bavaria 88% of all fetuses during labor are monitored, 69.2% of them continously (F. K. Wulf, personal communication 1983). Similar figures (90%) have been published by Baumgarten, who reviewed 44750 deliveries in the German-speaking countries (Baumgarten 1981). Electronic fetal monitoring has been subject to criticism (Haverkamp et al. 1976; Banta and Thacker 1979a; Baumgarten 1981; Dunn 1979): the method requires application of transducers and electrodes which are connected to machines by wires or small cables. Some feel that this “confinement” of the mother detracts from the spontaneity of the experience. Others have been concerned with its contribution to the overall costs of pregnancy (Banta and Thacker 1979b). Still others have openly questioned the efficacy of this widely accepted technique (Banta and Thacker 1979b; Hobbins et al. 1979). However, during the past few years there has been increasing evidence that FHR monitoring leads to:
-
1.
A decrease in neonatal death rate (Amato 1977; Neutra et al. 1978; Paul and Hon 1974; Paul et al. 1980; Tutera and Newman 1975; Bolte 1983; Baumgarten 1981)
-
2.
A decrease in fetal morbidity measured by Apgar scores (Amato 1977; Ballas et al. 1980; Gabert and Stenchever 1974, 1977; Mueller-Heubach et al. 1980; Johnstone et al. 1978; Shenker et al. 1975) as well as umbilical pH values (renou et al. 1976; Baumgarten 1981)
-
3.
No substantial increase in cesarean section rate (Gabert and Stenchever 1977; Hughey et al. 1977; Mueller-Heubach et al. 1980; Johnstone et al. 1978; Kelso et al. 1978; Bolte 1983; Baumgarten 1981; Boehm et al. 1981; Ramzin and Weil 1981)
-
4.
A significant reduction in the number of infants with neurological sequelae (Ingemarsson et al. 1981; Baumgarten 1981)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amato JC (1977) Fetal monitoring in a community hospital, a statistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 50:269
Bailas S, Hornstein E, Jaffa AJ, Toaff R (1980) Selective versus routine intrapartum monitoring: comparison of effects on perinatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 59:301
Banta HD, Thacker SB (1979a) Fetal monitoring. Letters to the editor. Obstet Gynecol 54:667
Banta HD, Thacker SB (1979b) Assessing the costs and benefits of electronic fetal monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Surv [Suppl] 34:627
Baumgarten K (1981) The benefits and hazards of feto-maternal monitoring. J Perinat Med 9:257
Boehm FH, Davidson KK, Barrett JM (1981) The effect of electronic fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140:295
Bolte A (1983) Der Stellenwert der intrapartualen Kardiotokographie. Ein Beitrag zur Effizienz der Methode. Verh Dtsch Ges Gynäkol Geburtshilfe, Arch Gynecol 235:641
Caldeyro-Barcia R (1958) Uterine contractility in obstetrics. 2nd Figo congress, Montreal
Dunn PM (1979) Problems associated with fetal monitoring during labour. Perinatal medicine, VI. European congress, Vienna. Thieme, Stuttgart
Gabert HA, Stenchever MA (1974) Electronic fetal monitoring as a routine practice in an obstetric service: a progress report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 118:534
Gabert HA, Stenchever MA (1977) The results of a five-year study of continous fetal monitoring on an obstetrical service. Obstet Gynecol 50:275
Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG, Cetrulo C (1976) The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125:310
Hobbins JC, Freeman R, Queenan JT (1979) The fetal monitoring dabate. Editorial. Obstet Gynecol 54:103
Hughey MJ, La Pata RE, McElin TW, Lussky R (1977) The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 49:513
Ingemarsson E, Ingemarsson I, Svenningsen NW (1981) Impact of routine fetal monitoring during labor on fetal outcome with long-term follow-up. J Obstet Gynecol 141:29
Johnstone FD, Cambell DM, Hughes GJ (1978) Has continuous intrapartum monitoring made any impact on fetal outcome Lancet 1:1298
Kelso JM, Parsons J, Lawrence GF, Arora SS, Edmonds DK, Cooke ID (1978) An assessment of continous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131:526
Mueller-Heubach E, MacDonald HM, Joret D, Portman MA, Edelstone DI, Caritis SN (1980) Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137:758
Neutra RR, Fienberg SE, Greenland S, Friedman EA (1978) Effect of fetal monitoring on neonatal death rates. N Engl J Med 299:324
Paul R, Hon EH (1974) Clinical fetal monitoring. V. Effect on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 118:529
Paul HR, Gauthier RJ, Quilligan EJ (1980) Clinical fetal monitoring. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 59:289
Ramzin MS, Weil A (1981) Neue Aspekte der perinatalen Mortalität. In: Schmidt E, Dudenhausen JW, Saling E (Hrsg) Perinatale Medizin, Vol 8. Thieme, Stuttgart
Renou P, Chang A, Anderson I, Wood C (1976) Controlled trial of fetal intensive care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:470
Roemer VM, Brühl G, Mietzner S, Heering P, Heinzl S (1981) Die Dezeleration in der direkten Kardiotokographie: Quantitative und qualitative Analyse. In: Schmidt E, Dudenhausen JW, Saling E (Hrsg) Perinatale Medizin, Vol 9. Thieme, Stuttgart
Shenker L, Post RC, Seiler JS (1975) Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor. Obstet Gynecol 46:185
Tutera G, Newman RL (1975) Fetal monitoring: its effect on the perinatal mortality and cesarean section rates and its complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 122:750
Westgren M, Ingemarsson E, Ingemarsson I, Solum T (1980) Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 56:301
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roemer, V.M., Bühler, K., Kieback, D.G. (1985). The Use of Fetal Surveillance During Labor in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Künzel, W. (eds) Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70358-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70358-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70360-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70358-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive