Advertisement

Associative Predispositions

  • S. Revusky
Part of the Dahlem Workshop Reports book series (DAHLEM, volume 29)

Abstract

A failure to understand instances of selective association in the context of a general learning process results in a very superficial analysis.

Keywords

Taste Aversion Area Postrema Taste Aversion Learning Amyl Acetate Odor Aversion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Bolles, R.C. 1970. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. Psychol. Rev. 77: 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Coil, J.D., and Garcia, J. 1977. Conditioned taste aversion: The illness US. In Biological Approaches to Learning: Papers presented at the Northeastern Regional Meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, pp. 1–28. St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Durlach, P.J., and Rescorla, R.A. 1980. Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms of within compound associations. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behay. Proc. 6: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Galef, B.G., Jr., and Osborne, B. 1978. Novel taste facilitation of the association of visual cues with toxicosis in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92: 907–916.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Garcia, J., and Rusiniak, K.W. 1980. What the nose learns from the mouth. In Chemical Signals: Vertebrates and Aquatic Invertebrates, eds. D. Muller-Schwarze and R.M. Silverstein, pp. 141–156. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Gillette, K.; Martin, G.M.; and Bellingham, W.P. 1980. Differential use of food and water cues in the formation of conditioned aversions by domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behay. Proc. 6: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Lett, B.T. 1983. Pavlovian drug-sickness pairings result in the conditioning of an antisickness response. Behay. Neurosci. 97: 779–784.Google Scholar
  8. (7).
    Lett, B.T. 1983. Pavlovian drug-sickness pairings result in the conditioning of an antisickness response. Behay. Neurosci. 97: 779–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    LoLordo, V.M. 1979. Selective associations. In Mechanisms of Learning and Motivation: A Memorial Volume to Jerzy Konorski, eds. A. Dickinson and R.A. Boakes, pp. 367–398. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Mackintosh, N.J. 1977. Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In Constraints on Learning: Limitations and Predispositions, eds. R.A. Hinde and J. Stevenson-Hinde, pp. 75–96. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Revusky, S. 1977. Learning as a general process with an emphasis on data from feeding experiments. In Food Aversion Learning, eds. N.W. Milgram, L. Krames, and T.M. Alloway, pp. 1–51. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Revusky, S., and Coombes, S. 1982. Long-delay associations produced in rats by injecting two drugs in sequence. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 96: 549–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Revusky, S.; Coombes, S.; and Pohl, R.W. 1982. Drug states as discriminative stimuli in a flavor-aversion learning experiment. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 96: 200–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Revusky, S., and Garcia, J. Learned associations over long delays. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Theory and Research, ed. G. Bower, vol. 4, pp. 1–83. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Rozin, P. 1976. The evolution of intelligence and access to the cognitive unconscious. In Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, eds. J.M. Sprague and A.N. Epstein, vol. 6, pp. 245–280. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Rusiniak, K.W.; Garcia, J.; and Hankins, W.G. 1976. Bait shyness: avoidance of the taste without escape from the illness in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 90: 460–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Rusiniak, K.W.; Palmerino, C.P.; Rice, A.G.; Forthman, D.L.; and Garcia, J. 1982. Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 94: 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    Shettleworth, S.J. 1978. Reinforcement and the organization of behavior in golden hamsters: Punishment of three action patterns. Learn. Motiv. 9: 93–123.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Taukulis, H.K. 1974. Odor aversions produced over long CS-US delays. Behay. Biol. 10: 505–510Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Wilcoxin, H.C.; Dragoin, W.B.; and Kral, P.A. 1971. Illness induced aversions in rat and quail: Relative salience of visual and gustatory cues. Science 171: 826–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Berlin, Heildelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Revusky
    • 1
  1. 1.Memorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’s, NewfoundlandCanada

Personalised recommendations