Abstract
An understanding of learning in complex neural systems requires the knowledge of neuronal connections and signals which together code for stimuli, responses, and their relationships. A higher-order neuron forms a nodal point of convergence of afferent and efferent channels and owes its stimulus selectivity both to its intrinsic properties and to the connections it makes with other neurons. Such a neuron, under certain conditions, shows not only how the brain encodes complex stimuli but also how experience determines or modifies its stimulus selectivity. One of the brain areas for the control of birdsong contains neurons selective for the individual bird’s own song. These neurons seem to acquire their stimulus selectivity during song development. This article also discusses recent theories about the neural substrates of song learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barlow, B. 1972. Single units and sensation: A neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Perception 1: 371–394.
Capranica, R.R. 1972. Why auditory neurophysiologists should be more interested in animal sound communication. Physiologist 15: 55–66.
DeVoogd, T.J., and Nottebohm, F. 1981. Sex differences in dendritic morphology of a song control nucleus in the canary: A quantitative Golgi study. J. comp. Neurol. 196: 309–316.
Guettinger, H.R. 1981. Self differentiation of song organization rules by deaf canaries. Z. Tierpsych. 56: 323–340.
Gurney, M.E. 1981. Hormonal control of cell form and number in the zebra finch song system. J. Neurosci. 1: 658–673.
Kandel, E.R. 1979. Cellular insight into behavior and learning. Harvey Lect. Ser. 73: 19–92.
Katz, L.C. 1982. The avian motor system for song has multiple sites and types of auditory input. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 8: 1021.
Katz, L.C., and Gurney, M.E. 1981. Auditory responses in the zebra finch’s motor system for song control. Brain Res. 221: 192–197.
Kelly, D.B., and Nottebohm, F. 1979. Projections of a telencephalic auditory nucleus -field L- in the canary. J. comp. Neurol. 183: 455–470.
Knudsen, E.I. 1983. Early auditory experience aligns the auditory map of space in the optic tectum of the barn owl. Science 222: 939–942.
Knudsen, E.I.; Knudsen, P.F.; and Esterly, S.D. 1982. Early auditory experience modifies sound localization in barn owls. Nature 295: 238–240.
Konishi, M. 1963. The role of auditory feedback in the vocal behavior of the domestic fowl. Z. Tierpsych. 20: 349–367.
Konishi, M. 1965. The role of auditory feedback in the control of song in the white-crowned sparrow. Z. Tierpsych. 22: 770–783.
Kroodsma, D.E. 1984. Songs of the Alder Flycatcher (Empidonax alnorum) and Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) are innate. Auk, in press.
Margoliash, D. 1983. Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. J. Neurosci. 3: 1039–1057.
Marier, P. 1970. A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white-crowned sparrows. J. comp. Physiol. Psych. 76 (2): 1–25.
Marier, P. 1981. Birdsong: The acquisition of a learned motor skill. Trends Neurosci. 4: 88–94.
Marier, P., and Sherman, V. 1982. Song structure without auditory feedback: Emendations of the auditory template hypothesis. J. Neurosci. 3: 517–531.
Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
McCasland, J.S. 1983. Neuronal Control of Bird Song Production. Ph. D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
McCasland, J.S., and Konishi, M. 1981. Interaction between auditory and motor activities in an avian song control nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 7815–7819.
Moiseff, A., and Konishi, M. 1983. Binaural characteristics of units in the owl’s brainstem auditory pathway: Precursors of restricted spatial receptive fields. J. Neurosci. 3: 2553–2562.
Newsome, W.T.; Wurtz, R.H.; Durstler, M.R.; and Mikami, A. 1983. Deficits in pursuit eye movements after chemical lesions of motion-related visual areas in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 9 (46.11): 154.
Nottebohm, F. 1980. Brain pathways for vocal learning in birds: A review of the first 10 years. Prog. Psychobiol. Physiol. Psychol. 9: 85–124.
Nottebohm, F. 1980. Testosterone triggers growth of brain vocal control nuclei in adult female canaries. Brain Res. 189: 429–436.
Nottebohm, F. 1981. A brain for all seasons: Cyclical anatomical changes in song control nuclei in the canary brain. Science 214: 1368–1370.
Nottebohm, F. 1981. Laterality, seasons and space govern the learning of a motor skill. Trends Neurosci. 4 (5): 104–106.
Nottebohm, F., and Arnold, A.P. 1976. Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the song bird brain. Science 194: 211–213.
Nottebohm, F.; Kasparian, S.; and Pandazis, C. 1981. Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res. 213: 99–109.
Nottebohm, F.; Kelly, D.B.; and Paton, J.A. 1982. Connections of vocal control nuclei in the canary telencephalon. J. comp. Neurol. 207: 344–357.
Nottebohm, F.; Manning, E.; and Nottebohm, M.E. 1976. Left hypoglossal dominance in the control of canary and white-crowned sparrow song. J. comp. Physiol. 108: 171–192.
Nottebohm, F., and Nottebohm, M.E. 1971. Vocalizations and breeding behavior of surgically deafened Ring Doves (Streptopelia risoria). Anim. Behay. 19: 313–327.
Nottebohm, F., and Nottebohm, M.E. 1978. Relationship between song repertoire and age in the canary, Serinus canarius. Z. Tierpsych. 46: 298–305.
Nottebohm, F.; Stokes, T.M.; and Leonard, C.M. 1976. Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius. J. comp. Neurol. 165: 457–486.
Paton, J.A.; Manogue, K.R.; and Nottebohm, F. 1981. Bilateral organization of the vocal control pathway in the budgerigar, Melopsittacus undulatus. J. Neurosci. 1: 1276–1288.
Price, P.H. 1977. Determinants of Acoustical Structure in Zebra Finch Song. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Rauschecker, J.P. 1984. Neuronal mechanisms of developmental plasticity in the cat’s visual system. In Human Neurobiology, ed. A. Fiorentini, vol. 3. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, in press.
Sullivan, W.E., and Konishi, M. 1984. Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J. Neurosci., in press.
Takahashi, T.T.; Moiseff, A.; and Konishi, M. 1984. Time and intensity cues are separately processed in the owl’s auditory brainstem. J. Neurosci., in press.
Tsukahara, N. 1981. Synaptic plasticity in the mammalian central nervous system. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 4: 351–379.
Van Essen, D.C. 1979. Visual areas of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 2: 227–263.
Waser, M.S., and Marier, P. 1977. Song learning in canaries. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91: 1–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Berlin, Heildelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Konishi, M. (1984). A Logical Basis for Single-neuron Study of Learning in Complex Neural Systems. In: Marler, P., Terrace, H.S. (eds) The Biology of Learning. Dahlem Workshop Reports, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70094-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70094-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70096-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70094-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive