Abstract
An attempt was made to quantify the effects of a cerebellar lesion on a specific simple motor task called ”probing” of the electric fish Eigenmannia. Probing serves to improve the “electric image” of objects (Heiligenberg 1975, Bacher 1983). It is a smooth bending of the body towards the object. Using a coordinate system as in Fig. 1 the bending could be described by y (t) = f (x) • sin (9.8t — γ (x), the lesion resulted in a change of the probing such that the above expression differed only in the sign of the phase becoming y (t) = f (x) • sin (9.8t + γ (x)). The difference in the sign of the phase means, that the movement in a normal fish starts at the tip of the tail whereas in a lesioned one at the head. Lesions resulting in this effect had to cover at least part of the region where electrosensitive units have been recorded (Bastian 1974, Behrend 1977). Sparing this region did not alter the normal behavior (see Fig. 2 open triangles and circles). The effect showed no dependency on wether the lesion was unilateral or bilateral nor was there evidence of differential effects for differently located lesions. This is certainly due to the collection of Y-values from a frozen TV picture limiting the accuracy since, as described below, minute changes in segmental timing probably caused by any lesion should manifest quite different overall movements. This order of onset of segmental activity accounting for the movement was calculated using a fish model. It turned out that the movement of a normal animal required a contraction of all segments simultaneously on one side, whereas in the lesioned animal a delay of 0.5 ms between the segments was needed. Considering the cerebellum as a predictive motor space-time metric as formulated by Pellionisz and Llinds (1982) the phase shift is exactly what one would predict in a type of movement where the single components — the segmental muscles — work in a sinusoidal fashion. It results from the missing “lookahead” normally provided by the cerebellar metric.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bacher M (1983) A new method for the simulation of electric fields, generated by electric fish, and their distorsions by objects. Biol Cybernet 47: 51–58
Bastian J (1974) Electrosensory input to the corpus cerebelli of the high frequency electric fish Eigenmannia virescens. J Comp Physiol 90: 1–24
Behrend K (1977) Processing information carried in a high frequency wave: Properties of cerebellar units in a high frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol 118: 357–371
Heiligenberg W (1975) Theoretical and experimental approaches to spatial aspects of electrolocation. J Comp Physiol 103: 247–272
Pellionisz A, Llinâs R (1982) Space-time representation in the brain. The cerebellum as a predictive space-time metric tensor. Neuroscience 7: 2949–2970
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Behrend, K. (1984). Cerebellar Control of Movement in Fish as Revealed by Small Lesions. In: Bloedel, J.R., Dichgans, J., Precht, W. (eds) Cerebellar Functions. Proceedings in Life Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69980-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69980-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69982-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69980-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive