Advertisement

Methodological Considerations in the Study of Clinical Pain

  • N. Wells
Conference paper
Part of the Health Systems Research book series (HEALTH)

Abstract

In all approaches to the study of human behavior, the elements of theory, methodology, and research activity are fundamentally interrelated. Theory gives order and insight to the research activity, while methodology leads to different features of this reality. Methodology forms a framework within which the answers to a research question are elicited. However, the methodology selected offers not only certain advantages but also limitations. This paper will address some of the methodological issues that arise when studying the effects of noninvasive techniques for the relief of acute surgical pain. Noninvasive techniques used in the clinical setting include cognitive distraction, relaxation, and imagery.

Keywords

Postoperative Pain Noninvasive Technique Pain Sensation Money Demand Cross Modality Match 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beecher HK (1959) Measurement of subjective response. Oxford University Press, New York, p 162Google Scholar
  2. Egbert LD, Battit GE, Welch CE, Bartlett MK (1964) Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instructions of patients. N Engl J Med 270: 825–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Flaherty GG, Fitzpatrick JJ (1978) Relaxation technique to increase comfort level of postoperative patients. Nurs Res 27: 352–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Janis IL (1958) Psychological stress. Wiley, New York, p 367Google Scholar
  5. Johnson JE (1972) Effects of structuring patients’ expectations on their reactions to threatening events. Nurs Res 21: 499–504 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Langer EJ, Janis IL, Wolfer JA (1975) Reduction of psychological stress in surgical patients. J Exp Soc Psychol 11: 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Melzack R (1975) The McGill pain questionnaire. Pain 1: 277–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Melzack R, Wall PD (1982) The challenge of pain. Penguin Books, New York, p 402, 70–71Google Scholar
  9. Mogan J, Wells N, Robertson E (in press) Can relaxation reduce postoperative pain?Google Scholar
  10. Pickett C, Clum GA (1982) Comparative treatment strategies and their interaction with locus of control in the reduction of postsurgical pain and anxiety. J Consult Clin Psychol 50: 439–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Scott LE, Clum GA, Peoples JB (1983) Preoperative predictors of postoperative pain. Pain 15: 283–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tamsen A, Sakurado T, Wahlstrom A, Terenius L, HartvigP (1982) Postoperative demands for analgesics in relation to individual levels of endorphins and substance P in cerebrospinal fluid. Pain 13: 171–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wells N (1982) The effect of relaxation on postoperative muscle tension and pain. Nurs Res 31: 235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Wells
    • 1
  1. 1.School of NursingUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations