Summary
The maximum firing rate of the “final common pathway„ is limited to 50–60 imp/sec by mechanisms such as stretch reflex, tension limitation by Golgi tendon organs, presynaptic inhibition and Renshaw inhibition. Spinal mechanisms with stereotypic patterns would, for example, interrupt static contractions by excitation of Golgi tendon organs. By means of Hoffmann’ reflex investigations gonistic facilitation and antagonistic inhibition can be demonstrated. Immediately after increased H-potential by agonistic innervation a silent period can be observed, which is partially due to spinal limitations.
The flexibility of spinal controls in muscle spindle mechanism is performed either by γ-loop-innervation or direct activation of α-motoneurons. The other limiting mechanisms differ at their interneurons, which can be excited (stabilization) or inhibited (enhanced motor ability) by central pathways. In highly trained athletes the firing rate limits of the final common pathway can probably be reduced or cancelled out. This is probably one of the reasons, why sport injuries occur more frequently in highly trained athletes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Burg D, Szumski AJ, Struppler A, Velho F (1973) Afferent and efferent activation of human muscle receptors involved in reflex and voluntary contraction. Exp Neurol 41:754
Henatsch H-D (1976) Bauplan der peripheren und zentralen sensomotorischen Kontrollen. In: Gauer OH, Kramer K, Jung R (Hrsg) Physiologie des Menschen, Bd XIV: Sensomotorik. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München
Jung R (1976) Einführung in die Bewegungsphysiologie. In: Gauer OH, Kramer K, Jung R (Hrsg) Physiologie des Menschen, Bd XIV: Sensomotorik. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München
Myers SJ, Lovelace RE (1971) The motor unit and muscle action potentials. In: Downey JA, Darling RC (eds) Physiological basis of rehabilitation medicine. Saunders, Philadelphia
Person RS (1974) Die Arbeit der Muskeln bei den Bewegungsakten des Menschen. In: Pickenhain S (Hrsg) Sportphysiologie. VEB Volk und Gesundheit, Berlin
Stoboy H (1980a) Reflektorische Kontrolle und Muskeltätigkeit. In: Witt AN, Rettig H, Schlegel KF, Hackenbroch M, Hupfauer W (Hrsg) Orthopädie in Praxis und Klinik, Bd. I: Allgemeine Orthopädie. Thieme, Stuttgart New York
Stoboy H (1980b) Physiologie der Skelettmuskulatur in ihrer Anpassung auf sportliche Belastungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Flexibilität spinaler Reflexmechanismen. In: Nowacki PE, Böhmer D (Hrsg) Sportmedizin — Aufgaben und Bedeutung für den Menschen in unserer Zeit. Thieme, Stuttgart
Struppler A (1974) Elektromyographie der zentralen Innervationsstörungen. In: Hopf HC, Struppler A (Hrsg) Elektromyographie. Thieme, Stuttgart
Vallbo AB (1971) Muscle spindle response at the onset of isometric voluntary contractions in man. Time difference between fusimotor and skeleto-motor effects. J Physiol (Lond) 218:413
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stoboy, H. (1984). Flexibilität spinaler Regelmechanismen; Vorteile und Gefahren. In: Jeschke, D. (eds) Stellenwert der Sportmedizin in Medizin und Sportwissenschaft/Position of Sports Medicine in Medicine and Sports Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69916-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69916-0_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-13661-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69916-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive