Advertisement

Quality Control and Test Criteria in Ergometry

  • H. Löllgen
Conference paper

Abstract

Quality control is an established requirement in medicine. It is strongly related to standardization on the one hand and to test criteria on the other. Quality assurance is a basic procedure in clinical chemistry, but it has been neglected in ergometry. Recent results on ergometer calibration tests yielded deviations between measured and indicated power output of about 50% [2,11]. Obviously, there is a need for quality control in cardiovascular testing, especially in stress testing. This can be underlined by recommendations proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA) [5] and by recent efforts of the German Society for Cardiovascular Research to establish quality control criteria. Further, as has been shown by Philbrick et al. [15], exercise testing requires methodological improvements in patient selection, data collection and data analysis. The enthusiasm about the Bayes’ theorem again highlights the need for an improved approach to interpretation of stress testing, another aspect of quality control [3,14,16, 20].

Keywords

Stress Testing Exercise Testing American Heart Association Test Criterion Cardiovascular Testing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blackburn H (1968) The exercise electrocardiogram: differences in interpretation. Am J Cardiol 21: 871–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cramer E (1984) Draft of a recommendation for type testing of ergometers for footcranking work. In this volumeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979) Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 300: 1350–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML (1975) Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation 52: 979–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellestadt M, Blomquist CG, Naughton JP (1979) Standards for adult exercise testing laboratories. Circulation 59: 421A–430 AGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ederer F (1975) Patient bias, investigator bias and the double-masked procedure in clinical trial. Am J Med 58: 295–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eissing G (1982) Eicheinrichtung fur Fahrradergometer. Biomed Tech 27: 84–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7 a.
    a. Franetzki M, Kresse H: Uberblick uber die Verfahren der Pneumotachographie mit neuen MeBansatzen. Jahrestagung der Dtsch Ges f Biophysik und Med Technik, 6.10. 1972, Erlangen (Abstract and manuscript)Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Fröhlicher VF (1983) Exercise testing and training: clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1: 114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    Goffloo K (1984) Quality criteria and power calibration on ergometers. In this volumeGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    Hellerstein HK (1979) Specifications for exercise testing equipment. Circulation 59: 849 A–854AGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    Hoffmann K, Kuhlmann E (1983) MeBtechnische Untersuchungen an Fahrrad-Ergometern - Zur Kalibrierung von Ergometern. In: Mellerowicz H, Franz I-W (eds) Standardisierung, Ka- librierung und Methodik in der Ergometrie. Perimed, Erlangen, pp 14–22Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Lange H-J, Hertle FH (1968) Zum Problem der Normalwerte. In: Hertz CW (ed) Begutachtung von Lungenfunktionsprufungen. Thieme, Stuttgart pp 44–64Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Löllgen H (1983) Kardiopulmonale Funktionsdiagnostik. Documenta Geigy, WehrGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    McNeil BJ, Adelstein SJ (1976) Determining the value of diagnostic and screening tests. J Nucleid Med 17: 439–448Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Philbrick JT, Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR (1980) Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: group, analysis and bias. Am J Cardiol 48: 807–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 16.
    Rifkin RD, Hoop WB (1977) Bayesian analysis of electrocardiographic exercise stress testing. N Engl J Med 297: 681–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    Smidt U, v Nieding G, Löllgen H (1976) Methodische Probleme der Atemgasmessung. Biomed Tech 21: 102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    Tonks DB (1963) Quality control systems in clinical chemistry laboratories. Postgrad Med J 34: A55–A70Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Ulmer H-V (1970) Eine Einrichtung zur schnellanzeigenden, analogen und digitalen Registrie- rung der Stoffwechselgrofien sowie weiterer ergometrischer Daten. Int Z Angew Physiol 28: 292–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    Wagner HN (1982) Bayes’theorem: an idea whose time has come? Am J Cardiol 49: 375–377Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Wilmore JH, Constable SH, Stanforth PR, Buono MJ, Tsao YW, Roby FB, Lowdon BJ, Ratcliff RA (1982) Mechanical and physiological calibration of four cycle ergometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14: 322–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 22.
    Wollschlager H, Lollgen H, Zeiher A, Wieland B, Just H (1984) Significance of longitudinal variance of ergometric measurements. In this volumeGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    Mellerowicz H, Franz I-W (eds) (1983) Standardisierung, Kalibrierung und Methodik in der Ergometrie. Perimed, ErlangenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Löllgen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations