Advertisement

Prediction of Subjective Preference in Concert Halls

  • Yoichi Ando
Part of the Springer Series in Electrophysics book series (SSEP, volume 17)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate acoustic quality at each seat of concert hall prior to its final architectural design. First of all, a workable model of the auditory system is presented which conforms to the auditory physiological system as described by the present level of knowledge. Then, the optimal design objectives and the linear scale value of preference for each parameter are given. Finally, as an example, the scale values of preference at each seat in a concert hall are calculated and the contour lines of equal preference are illustrated in the plan of the hall.

Keywords

Autocorrelation Function Sound Source Sound Field Interaural Time Difference Auditory Pathway 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 5.1
    L. A. Jeffress: J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 41, 35–39 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 5.2
    J. C. R. Licklider: Experientia VII/4, 128–134 (1951)Google Scholar
  3. 5.3
    F. L. Wightman: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 407–416 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.4
    J. A. Altman, L. J. Balonov, V. L. Deglin: Neuropsychologia 17, 295–301 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.5
    Y. Kikuchi: “Hemispheric Differences of the Auditory Evoked Potentials in Normal Japanese”, Audiology Japan 26, 699–710 (1983), in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.6
    Y. Ando, I. Hosaka: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74(S1), S64–5 (A) (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 5.7
    R. Cohn: Science 172, 599–601 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 5.8
    C. C. Wood, W. R. Goff, R. S. Day: Science 173, 1248–1251 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 5.9
    J. L. Lauter: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 1–17 (1983): See Fig. 2 in which data are cited from F. Spellacy’s dissertation, University of Victoria, Canada (1968)Google Scholar
  10. 5.10
    M. T. Wagner, R. Hannon: Brain and Language 13, 379–388 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 5.11
    V. O. Knudsen: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1, 56–82 (1929)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 5.12
    W. Kuhl: Acustica 4, 618–634 (1954)Google Scholar
  13. 5.13
    V. Fourdouiev: “Évaluation Objective de L’acoustique des Salles”, Proceedings of 5th International Congress on Acoustics, Liège, 51–54 (1965)Google Scholar
  14. 5.14
    T. Hontgast, H. J. M. Steeneken, R. Plomp: Acustica 46, 60–81 (1980)Google Scholar
  15. 5.15
    J.-D. Polack, H. Alrutz, M. R. Schroeder: Acustica 54, 259–265 (1984)Google Scholar
  16. 5.16
    K. Yamaguchi: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1271–1279 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 5.17
    Y. Ando: “Theory of Preference for Sound Fields in Concert Halls”, Fortschritte der Akustik, FASE/DAGA’82, Göttingen, 182–186 (1982)Google Scholar
  18. 5.18
    Y. Ando: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 873–887 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoichi Ando
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringKobe UniversityRokkodai, Nada KobeJapan

Personalised recommendations