Advertisement

Some Explanatory Boundaries of Organismic Analogies for the Understanding of Social Systems

  • P. Dachler
Part of the Springer Series in Synergetics book series (SSSYN, volume 26)

Abstract

A long tradition in the analysis of social institutions incorporates organismic analogies and metaphors as basic components into general conceptual frameworks which serve as the general conceptual context within which more specific theoretical propositions that can be empirically tested are derived. A part of this tradition involves the attempt to extend biocybernetic and general systems principles whose origin comes from research on natural systems, to the analysis of complex social institutions. To the extent that these general perspectives of social systems employ metaphors and analogies from natural systems, it is important to investigate the explanatory or theoretical benefit that they provide for a better understanding of social institutions.

Keywords

Social System Cognitive Structure Relational Network Collective Level Intergroup Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderfer, C.P., Group and intergroup relations, in: J.R. Hackman and J.L. Suttle (Eds.), Improving life at work, Santa Monica, Ca.: Goodyear, 1977Google Scholar
  2. Barbour, I.G., Myths, models and paradigms, New York: Harper and Row 1974Google Scholar
  3. Barker, E., Greek political theory, (5th ed.) London: Methusen, 1960Google Scholar
  4. Bateson, G., Steps to an ecology of mind, New York: Ballantine Books, 1972Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, G., Mind and nature, New York: Bantam Books, 1979Google Scholar
  6. Beer, S., Brain of the Firm, London, 1972Google Scholar
  7. Beer, S., The heart of enterprise, London, 1979Google Scholar
  8. Black, M., Models and metaphors, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1962Google Scholar
  9. Brwon, R.H., Social theory as metaphor. Theory and society, 1976, 3, 169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, D.T., On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition, American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 1103–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dulany, D.E., Awareness, rules and propositional control: A confrontation with S-R behavior theory, in: D. Horton & T. Dixon (Eds.), Verbal behavior and general behavior theory, New York: Prentice Hall, 1968Google Scholar
  12. Frankl, V., Der Mensch vor der Frage nach dem Sinn, München, 1979Google Scholar
  13. Gergen, K.J., Toward transformation in social knowledge, New York: Springer Verlag, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayek, F.A., Studies in philosophy, politics and economics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967Google Scholar
  15. Hayek, F.A., Die Theorie komplexer Phänomene, Walder Eucken Institut, Vorträge und Aufsätze, Bd. 36, Tübingen, 1972Google Scholar
  16. Hesse, M.B., Models and analogies in science, Notre Dame, in: Notre Dame Press, 1966Google Scholar
  17. Hesse, M.B., Models versus paradigms in the natural sciences, in: Lyndhurst Collins (Ed.), The use of models in the social sciences, 1–15, London: Tavistock, 1976Google Scholar
  18. Kanter, R.M., Men and Women of the corporation, New York: Basic Books, 1977Google Scholar
  19. Keeley, M., Organizational analogy: A comparison of organismic and social contract models, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1980, 25, 337–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kilmann, R.H., Thomas, K.W., Slevin, D.P., Nath, R. & Jerrell, S.L. (eds.) Producing useful knowledge for organizations, Prager Scientific Publications, 1983Google Scholar
  21. Kimberley, J.R., Miles, R.H. and associates The organizational life cycle, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980Google Scholar
  22. Luhmann, N., Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie, in: J. Habermas and N. Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, Frankfurt, 1971Google Scholar
  23. Malik, F., Zwei Arten von Managementtheorien: Konstruktion und Evolution, in: Hans Siegwart und Gilbert J.B. Probst (Hrsg.), Mitarbeiterführung und gesellschaftlicher Wandel, Bern/Stuttgart: Paul Haupt, 1983Google Scholar
  24. McCaskey, M.B., Managing change and ambiguity, Marshfield Mass., 1982Google Scholar
  25. Mitroff, I.I., Stakeholders of the organizational mind, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983Google Scholar
  26. Neisser, U., Cognition and reality, San Francisco: Freeman, 1976Google Scholar
  27. Parsons, T., Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations — 1, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1956, 1, 63–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pettigrew, A.S., The politics of organizational decision making, London: Tavistock, 1973Google Scholar
  29. Piaget, J., The origins of intelligence in children, New York: International Universities Press, 1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Piaget, J., The construction of reality in the child, New York: Basic Books, 1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pondy, L.R., Mitroff, I.I., Beyond open system models of organizations, in: Barry, M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 1, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1979Google Scholar
  32. Probst, J.B., Kybernetische Gesetzeshypothesen als Basis für Gestaltungs- und Lenkungsregeln im Management, Bern/Stuttgart: Paul Haupt, 1981Google Scholar
  33. Rapoport, A., Foreword, in: Walter Buckley (Ed.), Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist: xii–xiii, Chicago: Aldine, 1968Google Scholar
  34. Schön, D.A., Displacement of concepts, London: Tavistock, 1963Google Scholar
  35. Segal, S.J., Processing of the stimulus in imagery and perception, in: S.J. Segal (Ed.), Imagery: Current cognitive approaches, New York: Academic Press, 1971aGoogle Scholar
  36. Segal, S.J. (Ed.) Imagery: Current cognitive approaches, New York: Academic Press, 1971bGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, K.K., An intergroup perspective on individual behavior, in: J.R. Hackman, E.E. Lawler, L.W. Porter (Eds.), Perspectives on behavior in organizations, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977Google Scholar
  38. Smith, K.K., Groups in conflict: Prisons in disguise, Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt, 1982Google Scholar
  39. Smith, K.K., Social comparison processes and dynamic conservatism in intergroup relations, in: L.L. Cummings, Barry M, Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 5, Greenwich, Conn., 1983Google Scholar
  40. Sperry, R.W., Bridging science and values: a unifying view of mind and brain, American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ulrich, H., Unternehmungspolitik, Bern/Stuttgart: Paul Haupt, 1978Google Scholar
  42. Ulrich, H., Management — eine unverstandene gesellschaftliche Funktion, in: Hans Siegwart und Gilbert, J.B Probst (Hrsg.), Mitarbeiterführung und gesellschaftlicher Wandel, Bern/Stuttgart: Paul Haupt, 1983Google Scholar
  43. von Bertalanffy, L., General systems theory, New York: George Braziffer, 1968Google Scholar
  44. Watzlawick, P., The language of change, New York: Basic Books, 1978Google Scholar
  45. Weber, M., Economy and society, edited by Guenther Ross and Claus Witlich, Berkeley, CÂ: University of California Press, 1978Google Scholar
  46. Weick, K.E., The social psychology of organizing, (2nd ed.) Reading, Addi son-Wesley, 1979Google Scholar
  47. Willke, H., Systemtheorie, Stuttgart: UTB, 1982Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Dachler
    • 1
  1. 1.Hochschule für Wirtschafts- und SozialwissenschaftenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations