Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Motor Behavior: Theories of Impulse Variability



For centuries we have known that when people attempt to move quickly, they usually do so at the expense of spatial accuracy. Old statements such as “Haste makes waste” testify to the commonness of this kind of phenomenon. This effect is today termed the speed-accuracy trade-off, and has been the focus of considerable study in motor behavior.


Motor Behavior Spatial Error Force Requirement Force Variability Reversal Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong, T. R (1970). Training for the production of memorized movement patterns (Technical Report No. 26 ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Human Performance Center.Google Scholar
  2. Carter, M. C., Shapiro, D. C. (1984). Control of sequential movements: Evidence for generalized motor programs. Journal of Neurophysiology, 52, 787–796.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Crossman, E. R F. W., Goodeve, P. J. (1983). Feedback control of hand movements and Fitts’ law. Proceedings of the Experimental Society, Oxford, 1963. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35 A, 251–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denier van der Gon, J. J., Thuring, J. P. H. (1965). The guiding of human writing movements. Kybernetik, 2, 145–148.Google Scholar
  5. Fenn, W. O., Marsh, B. S. (1950). Muscular force at different speeds of shortening. Journal of Physiology (London), 85, 277–297.Google Scholar
  6. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fullerton, G. S., Cattell, J. M. (1892). On the perception of small differences. University of Pennsylvania Philosophical Series, No. 2.Google Scholar
  8. Ghez, C. (1979). Contributions of central programs to rapid limb movements in the cat. In H. Asanuma, V. J. Wilson (Eds.) Integration in the nervous system. Tokyo: Isaku-Shoin.Google Scholar
  9. Ghez, C., Vicario, D. (1978). The control of rapid limb movement in the cat: II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments. Experimental Brain Research, 33, 191–202.Google Scholar
  10. Hollerbach, J. M. (1981). An oscillation theory of handwriting. Biological Cybernetics, 39, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howarth, C. I., Beggs, W. D. A., Bowden, J. M. (1971). The relationship between speed and accuracy of movement aimed at a target.Acta Psychologica, 35, 207–218.Google Scholar
  12. Jenkins, W. O. (1947). The discrimination and reproduction of motor adjustments with various tapes of aircraft controls. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 396–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leikind, B.J. (1985). A generalization of constant acceleration formulas of Newtonian kinematics. Manuscript submitted for publication, UCLA.Google Scholar
  15. Merton, P. A. (1974). The properties of the human muscle servo. Brain Research, 71, 475–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E. K., Wright, C. E. (1982). Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements. Psychological Review, 89, 449–482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michon, J. A. (1967). Timing in temporal tracking. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception RNO-TNO.Google Scholar
  18. Newell, K. M. (1980). The speed-accuracy paradox in movement control: errors of time and space. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North- Holland.Google Scholar
  19. Newell, K. M., Carlton, L. G. (1983). On the force and force variability relationship. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 336 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  20. Newell, K. M., Carlton, L. G., Carlton, M. J. (1982). The relationship of impulse to response timing error. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1982, 14, 24–45.Google Scholar
  21. Newell, K. M., Carlton, L. G., Carlton, M. J., Haibert, J. A. (1980). Velocity as a factor in movement timing accuracy. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 47–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Newell, K. M., Carlton, L. G., Hancock, P. A. (in press). A kinetic analysis of response variability. Psychological Bulletin.Google Scholar
  23. Newell, K. M., Hoshizaki, L. E. F., Carlton, M. J., Halbert, J. A. (1979). Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing accuracy. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 49–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Noble, M. E., Bahrick, H. P. (1956). Response generalization as a function of intratask response similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 405–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Partridge, L. D. (1979). Muscle properties: A problem for the motor physiologist. In R. E. Talbot, D. R Humphrey (Eds.), Posture and movement. New York: Raven.Google Scholar
  26. Pew, R W. (1974). Human perceptual-motor performance. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Rack, P. M. H., Westbury, D. R. (1969). The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. Journal of Physiology, 204, 443–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Raibert, M. H. (1977). Motor control and learning by the state-space model (Technical Report No. AI-TR-439). Cambridge: MIT, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.Google Scholar
  29. Schmidt, R A. (1969). Movement time as a determiner of timing accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 43–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 86, 225–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt, R. A. (1976). Control processes in motor skills. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 4, 229–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt, R. A. (1982). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schmidt, R. A. (in press). The search for invariance in skilled movement behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt, R. A., Gielen, C. C. A. M., Zelaznik, H. N. ( 1985 a). Sources of variability in single aiming responses: Contributions of the decelerative phase. Paper read at the NASPSPA annual meeting, Gulfport, MS, June, 1985.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, R. A., Sherwood, D. E. (1982). An inverted-U relation between spatial error and force requirements in rapid limb movements: Further evidence for the impulse-variability model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Frank, J. S. (1978). Sources of inaccuracy in rapid movement. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.) Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motoroutput variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt, R A., Sherwood, D. E., Walter, C. B. Manuscript in preparation, UCLA, 1985 b.Google Scholar
  39. Shapiro, D. C. (1977). A preliminary attempt to determine the duration of a motor program. In D. M. Landers, R. W. Christina (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport I. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Press.Google Scholar
  40. Shapiro, D. C., Walter, C. B. The control of rapid positioning movements with spatiotemporal constraints. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1985.Google Scholar
  41. Shapiro, D. C., Schmidt, R. A. (1983). The control of direction in rapid aiming movements. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 9 (2), 1031. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  42. Sherwood, D. E. (1983). The impulse-variability model: Tests of the major assumptions and predictions. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Southern California, 1983.Google Scholar
  43. Sherwood, D. E. Major assumptions and predictions of the impulse-variability model. Manuscript submitted for publication, UCLA, 1984.Google Scholar
  44. Sherwood, D. E., Schmidt, R. A. (1980). The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 75–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sherwood, D. E., Schmidt, R A., Walter, C. B. Manuscript in preparation, UCLA, 1984.Google Scholar
  46. Soechting, J. F., Lacquaniti, F. (1983). Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 548–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Teasdale, N., Schmidt, R. A. (1985). Horizontal impact in the deceleration process of single aiming movements. Paper presented at the NASPSPA annual meeting, Gulfport, MS, June, 1985.Google Scholar
  48. Wilkie, D. R. (1950). The relation between force and velocity in human muscle. Journal of Physiology (London), 110, 249–280.Google Scholar
  49. Wing, A M., Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 455–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woodworth, R. S. (1901). On the voluntary control of the force of movement. Psychological Review, 8, 350–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zelaznik, H. N., Schmidt, R. A. (1983). Kinematic properties of single-aiming movements. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 335. (Abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations