Advertisement

The Falling Pencil and Superfluorescence: Macroscopic Indeterminacies After the Decay of Unstable Equilibria

  • Fritz Haake
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Synergetics book series (SSSYN, volume 22)

Abstract

Think of a sharpened pencil placed vertically head-down on a horizontal plane. Will it fall? In practice, it always will. A student of classical mechanics should argue, though, that the upright position corresponds to an unstable equilibrium which is, once realized, infinitely long-lived. The said student could explain the fall by extraneous perturbations such as random drafts of air, vibrations of the ground,etc., or by the practical difficulties of realizing the precise upright position. A mathematician might point out that within the set of positions initially available to the pencil the strictly vertical one is a subset of measure zero. Since the tiniest initial deviation from verticality suffices to destroy the equilibrium it would thus seem hopeless that one would ever be able to realize unstable equilibrium.

Keywords

Stimulate Raman Scattering Electric Polarization Unstable Equilibrium Excited Atom Fall Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Haroche, 5th Rochester Conference on Coherence and Quantum Optics, June 1983.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Bonifacio, P. Schwendimann, and F. Haake, Phys. Rev. A4, 302 (1971); A4, 854 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. Haake, J. Haus, H. King, G. Schröder, and R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. A23, 1322 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Q. H. F. Vrehen, in: Laser Spectroscopy IV, eds. H. Walther, and K. W. Rothe ( Springer, Berlin, 1979 ).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. T. Arecchi and V. Degiorgio, Phys. Rev. A3, 1108 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    I. A. Walmsley and M. G. Raymer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 962 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    see, e. g., W. Weidlich and G. Haag, Quantitative Sociology, Springer, Berlin (1983).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fritz Haake
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich PhysikUniversität-Gesamthochschule EssenEssenFed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations