Skip to main content

Comparison of Four Different Methods for the Diagnosis of Varicocele

  • Conference paper

Abstract

While the diagnosis of large varicoceles should not cause any problems, small varicoceles are often more difficult to detect on clinical palpation. Besides, some patients do present reflux in the internal spermatic vein without palpable distension of the pampiniform plexus [1]. Four objective techniques are available to diagnose such subclinical reflux. Scrotal thermography, Doppler blood-flow measurement and testicular perfusion analysis using radioisotopes are non-invasive, and useful for routine patient screening, whereas retrograde venography of the internal spermatic vein should be reserved for selected cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Comhaire F, Monteyne R, Kunnen M (1976) The value of scrotal thermography as compared with selective retrograde venography of the internal spermatic vein for the diagnosis of “subclinical” varicocele. Fertil Steril 27:694–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Comhaire F, Vandeweghe M, Simons M (1981) Comparison between thermography and venous scintigraphy of the scrotum. Int J Androl 4: 663—668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Holder LE, Martire JR, Holmes ER, Wagner HN (1977) Testicular radionuclide angiography and static imaging: anatomy, scintigraphic interpretation, and clinical indications. Radiology 125:739–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nadel NS, Gitter MH, Hahn LC et al. (1973) Preoperative diagnosis of testicular torsion. Urology 1:478–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nahoum CRD, Silveira de Almeida A, Flores E (1980) Scrotal scan in the diagnosis of varicocele. Fertil Steril 34/3:287–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Comhaire, F.H., Kunnen, M., Vandeweghe, M., Simons, M. (1984). Comparison of Four Different Methods for the Diagnosis of Varicocele. In: Glezerman, M., Jecht, E.W. (eds) Varicocele and Male Infertility II. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69435-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69435-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-12985-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69435-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics