Abstract
The broad purpose of this chapter is to show how a reevaluation of our notions of cognitive processes can lead to a more useful definition of emotional states, and how this working definition may facilitate research in the behavioral and neurosciences. We take as a working axiom the supposition of psychologies of experience that states of emotion exist, representing organizations of memories, current behavioral dispositions, and anticipated outcomes. However, we will raise the question: Is human subjectivity a valid guide to this terrain? Our main purpose is to provide (a) the basis for an explanation of emotional phenomena which is predicated on events that can be observed and measured by the community of scientists and (b) a theory that has no other constraint than the usual scientific requirements of data accountability, parsimony, and a potential statement of quantitative relationships in the logic of mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lang, P.J. (1984). Dead Souls: Or Why the Neurobehavioral Science of Emotion Should Pay Attention to Cognitive Science. In: Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Lutzenberger, W., Birbaumer, N. (eds) Self-Regulation of the Brain and Behavior. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69379-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69379-3_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69381-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69379-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive