Pitch Discrimination and Musical Interval Recognition in Backward Masking

  • A. Rakowski
Conference paper

Abstract

In recent years several authors have studied the interfering effect of a sound appearing later than a probe tone on the exact estimation of a pitch or timbre quality of that probe. Various terms have been introduced to describe this effect, such as “informational masking” (Pollack, 1975), “Backward interference” (Loeb and Holding, 1975) or “temporal interference” (Yost, Berg and Thomas, 1976). The amount of this interference is not critically dependent on the intensity ratio of interfering and probe tones.

Keywords

Acoustics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Leshowitz, B. and Ciidahy, E. (1973). Frequency discrimination in the presence of another tone. Percept. Psychophys. 54, 882–887.Google Scholar
  2. Loeb, M. and Holding, D.H. (1975). Backward interference by tones or noise in pitch perception as a function of practice. Percept. Psychophys. 18, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Massaro, D.W. (1970). Perceptual auditory images. J. Exp. Psychol. 77, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Massaro, D.W. (1975). Backward recognition masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58, 1059–1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Moran, H. and Pratt, C.C. (1926). Variability of judgements on musical intervals. J. Exp. Psychol. 9, 492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pollack, I. (1975). Auditory informational masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, Suppl. 1, s. 5.Google Scholar
  7. Yost, W.A., Berg, K., and Thomas, G.B. (1976). Frequency recognition in temporal interference tasks: A comparison among four psychophysical procedures. Percept. Psychophys. 20, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Rakowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Music AcousticsFrederic Chopin Academy of MusicWarszawaPoland

Personalised recommendations