Steady-State and Bolus Infusions in Hydrocephalus
Measurement of ventricular fluid pressure (VFP), including intraventricular infusion tests, is the most reliable method for differentiating between arrested and non-arrested hydrocephalus. The diagnostic value of steady-State infusion techniques has been well established (Børgesen and Gjerris 1982, Lamas and Lobato 1979). In the present study we evaluated the usefulness of various bolus infusions, paying special attention to relations between brain elastance, resistance to outflow of CSF (Rcsf) and ventricular size.
KeywordsEvans Index Ventricular Size Bolus Infusion Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Pressure Decay
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Børgesen SE, Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105:65–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamas E, Lobato RD (1979) Intraventricular pressure and CSF dynamics in chronic adult hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 12:287–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
Marmarou A, Shulman K, La Morgese J (1976) Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system. J Neurosurg 43:523–534Google Scholar
Sklar FH, Diehl JT, Beyer CW, Clark WK (1980) Brain elastiCity changes with ventriculomegaly. J Neurosurg 53:173–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan HG, Miller JD, Griffith RL, Carter W, Rucker S (1979) Bolus versus steady-State infusion for determination of CSF outflow resistance. Ann Neurol 5:228–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tans JTJ, Poortvliet DCJ (1982) Intracranial volume-pressure relationship in man. Part I: Calculation of the pressure-volume index. J Neurosurg 56:524–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1983