Application of Numerical Taxonomic Techniques in the Study of Behavior

  • Gary D. Schnell
  • Barbara L. Woods
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 1)

Abstract

Studies of behavior often produce substantial quantities of data involving multiple behavioral characteristics, frequently for a number of subjects. In many cases, quantitative analyses are required in order to summarize and simplify available information to a readily understandable level. It can be this very exercise of reduction that provides critical insights as to causal processes and character interrelationships. Problems of subjective definition face ethologists, particularly when it comes to descriptive aspects of their work and, thus, a number of investigators have been drawn to explicit methods in attempts to reduce subjective bias.

Keywords

Migration Cage Autocorrelation Macromolecule Arena 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, S.A. 1968. Sociobiology of rhesus monkeys IV: Testing Mason’s hypothesis of sex differences in affective behavior. Behaviour 32: 49–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, F., and C. Consul. 1978. The structure of social behavior in Theropithecug aelada Primates 19: 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage, K.B. 1981. Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels. Oecologia 48: 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aspey, W.P. 1977a. Wolf spider sociobiology: I. Agonistic display and dominance-subordinance relations in adult male Schizocosa crassipeg. Behaviour 62: 103–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aspey, W.P. 1977b. Wolf spider sociobiology: II. Density parameters influencing agonistic behavior in $chizocosa crassipes. Behaviour 62: 143–163.Google Scholar
  6. Aspey, W.P., and J.E. Blankenship. 1977. Spiders & snails & statistical tales: Application of multivariate analyses to diverse ethological data. Pages 75–120 in B. Hazlett (ed.), Quantitative methods in the study of animal behavior. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Aspey, W.P., and J.E. Blankenship. 1978. Comparative ethometrics: Congruence of different multivariate analyses applied to the same ethological data. Behay. Processes 3: 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baerends, G.P., R.H. Drent, P. Glas, and H. Groenewold. 1970. An ethological analysis of incubation behaviour in the herring gull. Behaviour Suppl. 17: 135–235.Google Scholar
  9. Begg, R.J.. and J.E. Nelson. 1977 The agonistic behaviour of gattus villosissimus. Aust. J. Zool. 25: 291–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bekoff, M. 1977 Quantitative studies of three areas of classical ethology: Social dominance, behavioral taxonomy, and behavioral variability. Pages 1–46 in B. Hazlett (ed.), Quantitative methods in the study of animal behavior. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Bekoff, M. 1978. A field study of the development of behavior in Adelie penguins: Univariate and numerical taxonomic approaches. Pages 177–202 in G.M. Burghart and M. Bekoff (eds.), The development of behavior: Comparative and evolutionary aspects. Garland STPM Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bekoff, M., H.L. Hill, and J.B. Mitton. 1975. Behavioral taxonomy in canids by discriminant function analyses. Science 190: 1223–1225.Google Scholar
  13. Blurton Jones, N.G. 1968. Observations and experiments on causation of threat displays of the great tit (Parus Maio;). Anim. Behay. Monogr. 1: 74–158.Google Scholar
  14. Bradley, D.W., and R.A. Bradley. 1983. Application of sequence comparison to the study of biro songs. in D. Sankoff and J.B. Kruskal (eds.), Time warps, string edits and macromolecules: The theory and practice of sequence comparison. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  15. Breed. M.D. 1976. The evolution of social behavior in primitively social bees: A multivariate analysis. Evolution 30: 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brothers. D.J., and C.D. Michener. 1974. Interactions in colonies of primitively social bees. III. Ethometry of division of labor in Lasioalossum zephvrum ( Hymenoptera: Halictidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 90: 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cattell, R.B., C.R. Bolz, and B. Korth. 1973. Behavioral types in purebred dogs objectively determined by Taxonome [a computer package]. Behay. Genet. 3: 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheke, R.A. 1977. A quantitative study of the grooming behavior of the mymarid wasp Alaptus fusculus. Physiol. Entomol. 2: 17–26.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, S., and D. McFarland. 1979. Time-sharing as a mechanism for the control of behaviour sequences during the courtship of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Anim. Behay. 27: 270–283.Google Scholar
  20. Cole, B.J. 1980. Repertoire convergence in two mangrove ants Zacrvotocerus varians and Camoonotus sp. Insectes Soc. 27: 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crook, J.H. 1963 A comparative analysis of nest structure in the weaver birds ( Ploceinae ). Ibis 105: 238–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies, W.G. 1978. Cluster analysis applied to the classification of postures in the Chilean flamingo (Phoenicooterus chilensis) Anim. Behay. 26: 381–388.Google Scholar
  23. Dawkins, R. 1976 Hierarchical organisation: A candidate principle for ethology. Pages 7–54 in P.P.G. Bateson and R.A. Hinde (eds.). Growing points in ethology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Dawkins, R., and M. Dawkins. 1976. Hierarchical organization and postural facilitation. Rules for grooming in flies. Anim. Behay. 24: 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DeGhett, V.J. 1978. Hierarchical cluster analysis. Pages 115–144 in P.W. Colgan (ed.), Quantitative ethology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Douglas, J.M., and R.L. Tweed. 1979. Analysing the patterning of a sequence of discrete behavioural events. Anim. Behay. 27: 1236–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dudzinski, M.L., and J.M. Norris. 1970. Principal components analysis as an aid for studying animal behavior. Forma et Functio 2: 101–109.Google Scholar
  28. Dunstone, N., and R.J. O’Connor. 1979. Optimal foraging in an amphibious mammal. H. A study using principal component analysis. Anim. Behay. 27: 1195–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Falls, J.B., and R.J. Brooks. 1975. Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. H. Effects of location. Can. J. Zool. 53: 1412–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frey, D.F., and R.A. Pimentel. 1978. Principal component analysis and factor analysis. Pages 219–245 in P.W. Colgan (ed.), Quantitative ethology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Golani, I. 1973. Non-metric analysis of behavioral interaction sequences in captive jackals (Canis aureus L.). Behaviour 44: 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldstein, R.B. 1978. Geographic variation in the “hoy” call of the bobwhite. Auk 95: 85–94.Google Scholar
  33. Gorton. R.E., Jr. 1981. Behavioral and ecological correlations within a cockroach community. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 54: 278–284.Google Scholar
  34. Guttman, R., I. Lieblich, and G. Naftali. 1969. Variation in activity scores and sequences in two inbred mouse strains, their hybrids, and backcrosses. Anim. Behay. 17: 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hafner, M.S., and D.J. Hafner. 1979. Vocalizations of grasshopper mice (genus Qnvchomvs) J. Mammal. 60: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall-Craggs, J. 1962. The development of song in the blackbird, Turdus merula. Ibis 104: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Halliday, T.R. 1976 The libidinous newt. An analysis of variations in the sexual behaviour of the male smooth newt, Triturus vulaaris. Anim. Behay. 24: 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heiligenberg, W. 1973. Random processes describing the occurrence of behavioural patterns in a cichlid fish. Anim. Behay. 21: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huntingford, F.A. 1976a. An investigation of the territorial behaviour of the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatug) using principal component analysis. Anim. Behay. 24: 822–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huntingford, F.A. 1976b. The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim. Behay. 24: 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Katz, J.O., and F.J. Rohlf. 1973. Function-point cluster analysis. Syst. Zool. 22: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koeppl, J.W., R.S. Hoffmann, and C.F. Nadler. 1978. Pattern analysis of acoustical behavior in four species of ground squirrels. J. Mammal. 59: 677–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lacher, T.E., Jr. 1981. The comparative social behavior of yerodon rupestris and Galea spixii and the evolution of behavior in the Caviidae. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. No. 17.Google Scholar
  44. Lehner, P.N. 1979. Handbook of ethological methods. Garland STPM Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Lenoir, A. 1979. Le comportement alimentaire et la division du travail chez la Fourmi yasius piger L. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 113: 79–334.Google Scholar
  46. Lenoir, A., and J.C. Mardon. 1978. Note sur l’application de l’analyse des correspondances à la division du travail chez les Fourmis. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. D 287: 555–558.Google Scholar
  47. Lynds, P.G. 1980. Intermale fighting and predatory behavior in house mice: An analysis of behavioral content. Aggressive Behay. 6: 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin, D.J. 1979. Songs of the fox sparrow. II. Intra- and interpopulation variation. Condor 81: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martindale, S. 1980. A numerical approach to the analysis of solitary vireo songs. Condor 82: 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maurus, M., and H. Pruscha. 1973. Classification of social signals in squirrel monkeys by means of cluster analysis. Behaviour 47: 106–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McArthur, P.D. 1982. Mechanisms and development of parent-young vocal recognition in the pifion jay (Gvmnorhinus cvanocephalus). Anim. Behay. 30: 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meudec, M., and A. Lenoir. 1982. Social responses to variation in food supply and nest suitability in ants (Tapinoma erraticum) Anim. Behay. 30: 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Michener, C.D. 1974. The social behavior of the bees. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  55. Mihok, S. 1976. Behaviour of subarctic red-backed voles (Clethrionomvs dapper, athabascae). Can. J. Zool. 54: 1932–1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller, E.H. 1979. An approach to the analysis of graded vocalizations of birds. Behay. Neural Biol. 27: 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller, L.L., J.M. Whitsett, J.G. Vandenbergh, and D.R. Colby. 1977. Physical and behavioral aspects of sexual maturation in male golden hamsters. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91: 245–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morgan, B.J.T., M.J.A. Simpson, J.P. Hanby, and J. Hall-Craggs. 1976. Visualizing interaction and sequential data in animal behaviour: Theory and application of cluster-analysis methods. Behaviour 56: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Noe, R., F.B.M. de Waal, and J.A.R.A.M. Van Hooff. 1980. Types of dominance in a chimpanzee colony. Folia Primatol. 34: 90–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Partridge, B.L. 1981. Internal dynamics and the interrelations of fish in schools. J. Comp. Physiol. 144: 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Payne, R.B. 1978. Microgeographic variation in songs of splendid sunbirds Nectarinia coccinigaster: Population phenetics, habitats and song dialects. Behaviour 65: 282–308.Google Scholar
  62. Payne, R.B., and P. Budde. 1979. Song differences and map distances in a population of Acadian flycatchers. Wilson Bull. 91: 29–41.Google Scholar
  63. Pimentel, R.A., and D.F. Frey. 1978. Multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant analysis. Pages 247–274 in P.W. Colgan (ed.). Quantitative ethology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Pitcher, T. 1979. Sensory information and the organization of behaviour in a shoaling cyprinid fish. Anim. Behay. 27: 126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rice, J.C. 1978. Behavioural interactions of interspecifically territorial vireos. I. Song discrimination and natural interactions. Anim. Behay. 26: 527–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rich, T. 1981. Microgeographic variation in the song of the sage sparrow. Condor 83: 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ringo, J.M., and R.J. Hodosh. 1978. A multivariate analysis of behavioral divergence among closely related species of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila Evolution 32: 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robertson, C.M. 1979. Aspects of sexual discrimination by female Siamese fighting fish (Betta gplendens Regan). Behaviour 70: 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosenfeld, J., L.A. Lasko, and E.C. Simmel. 1978. Multivariate analysis of exploratory behavior in gerbils. Bull. Psychonomic Soc. 12: 239–241.Google Scholar
  70. Schnell, G.D. 1973. A reanalysis of nest structure in the weavers ( Ploceinae) using numerical taxonomic techniques. Ibis 115: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simpson, M.J.A., and S. Howe. 1980. The interpretation of individual differences in rhesus monkey infants. Behaviour 72: 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith, E.O., and M.D. Fraser. 1978. Social play in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): A cluster analysis. Pages 79–112 in E.O. Smith (ed.), Social play in primates. Academic Press, New, York.Google Scholar
  73. Soucek, B., and F. Vencl. 1975. Bird communication study using digital computer. J. Theor. Biol. 49: 147–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sparling, D.W., and J.D. Williams. 1978. Multivariate analysis of avian vocalizations. J. Theor. Biol. 74: 83–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spence, I. 1978. Multidimensional scaling. Pages 175–217 in P.W. Colgan (ed.), Quantiative ethology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Stevenson-Hinde, J., R. Stillwell-Barnes, and M. Zunz. 1980. Subjective assessment of rhesus monkeys over four successive years. Primates 21: 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stevenson-Hinde, J., and M. Zunz. 1978. Subjective assessment of individual rhesus monkeys. Primates 19: 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Struhsaker, T.T. 1967. Social structure among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecug aethior). Behaviour 29: 83–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sugawara, K. 1979. Sociological study of a wild group of hybrid baboons between papio anubis and papio hamadrvas in the Awash Valley Ethiopia. Primates 20: 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Symmes, D., J.D. Newman, G. Talmage-Riggs, and A.K. Lieblich. 1979. Individuality and stability of isolation peeps in squirrel monkeys. Anim. Behay. 27: 1142–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thelen, E., and D.J. Farish. 1977. An analysis of the grooming behavior of wild and mutant strains of Dracon hebetor ( Braconidae: Hymenoptera). Behaviour 62: 70–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Van der Pers, J.N.C. 1981. Comparison of electroantennogram response spectra to plant volatiles in seven species of yponomeuta and in the tortricid Adaxophves orana. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 30: 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. 1973. Stuctural analysis of the social behaviour of a semicaptive group of chimpanzees. Europ. Monogr. Soc. Psychol. 4: 75–162.Google Scholar
  84. Wells, M.C., and M. Bekoff. 1981. An observational study of scent-marking in coyotes, Canis latrans. Anim. Behay. 29: 332–350.Google Scholar
  85. Wiens, J. 1982. Song pattern variation in the sage sparrow (Amphispiza belli): Dialects or epiphenomena? Auk 99: 208–229.Google Scholar
  86. Wiepkema, P.R. 1961. An ethological analysis of the reproductive behaviour of the bitterling (phodeus amarus Bloch). Arch. Neerl. Zool. 14: 103–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Williams, W.T., J. Kikkawa, and D.R. Morris. 1972. A numerical study of agonistic behaviour in the grey-breasted silvereye (Zosterops lateralis). Anim. Behay. 20: 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wood, D.S. 1982. A phenetic assessment of the Ciconiidae (Ayes) using skeletal morphology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Oklahoma, Norman.Google Scholar
  89. Zann, R. 1976. Inter- and intraspecific variation in the courtship of three species of grassfinches of the subgenus poephila (Gould) (Estrildidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 41: 409–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary D. Schnell
    • 1
  • Barbara L. Woods
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Oklahoma Biological SurveyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations