Skip to main content

Hierarchical Cluster Methods as Maximum Likelihood Estimators

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIG,volume 1))

Abstract

The algorithms of hierarchical cluster analysis are mainly heuristically motivated. This is especially true from the viewpoint of a mathematical statistician, who misses a precise probabilistic model. There are, though, statistical models in hierarchical cluster analysis which use such probabilistic statistical methods. In either approach one can consider hierarchical cluster analysis as a transformation from a dissimilarity matrix to an ultrametric matrix. If the data in a dissimilarity matrix are only disturbed values of the “true” ultrametric matrix, one can consider cluster analysis as estimating the true ultrametric matrix. With the maximum likelihood method one can for example find estimators — here cluster analysis methods — for each error distribution, i.e. for each way in which the data are disturbed. In this way we can develop the single-linkage, modified complete-linkage, median-linkage and average-linkage methods. Rigorous inspection of the models (error distributions) shows the limitations of these (perhaps too) simple models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bock, N.H. 1974. Automatische Klassifikation. Vandenhoek 8 Ruprecht, G?ttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degens, P.O. 1982. Hierarchische Clustermethoden als Maximum Likelihood Schätzer. Arbeitsbericht, Abteilung Statistik, Universität Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degens, P.O., and H. Federkiel. 1978. A Monte Carlo study on agglomerative large sample clustering. Compstat 78: 246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Physika Verlag Wien. Hartigan, J.A. 1967. Representation of similarity matrices by trees. JASA 62: 1140–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N., and R. Sibson. 1968. The construction of hierarchic and non-hierarchic classifications. Computer J. 11: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N., and R. Sibson. 1971. Mathematical taxonomy. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.C. 1967. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32: 241–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Degens, P.O. (1983). Hierarchical Cluster Methods as Maximum Likelihood Estimators. In: Felsenstein, J. (eds) Numerical Taxonomy. NATO ASI Series, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69024-2_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-69026-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-69024-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics