Perceptual Filters

  • G. D. Sullivan
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Information Sciences book series (SSINF, volume 11)

Abstract

Research into visual perception is currently dominated by three types of investigation: neurophysiology, psychophysics and computational studies. A complete understanding of a visual task requires a synthesis of all three. At present, our conception of the mechanisms of early vision is mainly derived from psychophysics and neurophysiology, and from these has emerged in recent years a fairly robust theory of the initial stages of vision. It is now widely accepted that early visual processes are served by multiple, independent, band-pass filters, each acting approximately linearly. The theory explains many phenomena in the vision of low-contrast repetitive patterns, but little progress has been made in understanding its implications in the more “natural” case of high-contrast, non-repetitive patterns. We have good reason to believe that the same mechanisms operate. Neurophysiological studies have shown that the single neural units which are assumed to underlie the psychophysically determined channels do not greatly change their properties in high-contrast conditions [1]. Furthermore, some aspects of high-contrast vision, such as the spatial frequency shift [2], and the frequency specific disruption of contrast matching after adaptation [3], make it likely that the band-pass channels at work in low-contrast conditions also serve high-contrast vision.

Keywords

fiLters Summing Lamar 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Movshon, J.A., I.D. Thompson, and D.J. Tolhurst. (1978) Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol, ( Lond ) 285, 101–120.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blakemore, C., J. Nachmias, and P. Sutton. (1970) The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency selective neurones in the human brain. J. Physiol., Lond. 210, 727–750.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blakemore, C., J.P.J. Muncy and R.M. Ridley. (1973) Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. Vision Res. 13, 1915–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marr, D. (1982) “Vision”, Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marr, D. and T. Poggio. (1979) A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B 204, 301–328.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ullman, S. (1979) “The Interpretation of Visual Motion”. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lamar, E.S., S. Hecht, S. Schlaer and C.D. Hendley (1947) Size, shape, and contrast detection of targets by daylight vision. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 37, 531–545.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blackwell, H.R. (1946) Contrast thresholds of the human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 36, 624–643.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sullivan, G.D., M.A. Georgeson and K.G. Oatley. (1972) Channels for spatial frequency selection and the detection of single bars by the human visual system. Vision Res. 12. 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barlow, H.B. (1978) The efficiency of detecting changes in random dot patterns. Vision Res. 18, 637–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green, D.M. and J.A. Swets, (1966) “Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics”. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baker, K.D., and G.D. Sullivan, (1980) Multiple bandpass filters in image processing. IEE Proc., 127 E(5).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marcela, S. (1980) Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 1297–1300.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marr, D. and E. Hildreth (1980) Theory of edge detection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 207, 187–217.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. D. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of SussexBrighton, SussexUK

Personalised recommendations