Advertisement

Regeneration and Repair of the Nervous System: Clinical Aspects

  • H.-J. Freund
  • H. J. Bauer
Conference paper
Part of the Dahlem Workshop Reports book series (DAHLEM, volume 24)

Abstract

In man, restoration of function after damage to the central nervous system (CNS) cannot be achieved by regeneration. It is, however, frequently accomplished by survival of the damaged neurons. This is only possible if the lesion is of a reversible nature. If the disease process or injury has caused irreversible damage, functional recovery can be achieved by compensatory mechanisms mediated by structures that have escaped damage. Restitution of function due to redundancy in a distributed system and substitution of function by the remaining part of the system represent further mechanisms underlying functional recovery after irreversible damage.

At the clinical level there are no reliable criteria for distinguishing reversible from irreversible lesions at the acute stage. It is therefore difficult to assess the extent of restoration of function after stroke or other acute lesions. Positron emission tomography seems to have the potential for making such a distinction. This would provide the basis for taking measures to prevent the progression of a potentially reversible into an irreversible lesion. The astonishing ability of the brain to survive complete ischemia for a time of as long as one hour and partial ischemia for much longer is an example of a potentially reversible lesion in acute stroke. The capacity for late structural repair is illustrated in the restoration of conduction in demyelinated central axons. At present, therapeutic strategies along these lines promise more benefit than attempts to achieve regeneration of destroyed tissue. However, the inroads made by experimental investigations into regeneration in the CNS justify intensive clinicopathological studies of this problem. In contrast to the poor regenerative capacity of the CNS, successful structural and functional repair mechanisms are illustrated by the remarkable ability of the peripheral neurons to regenerate.

Keywords

Schwann Cell Functional Recovery Human Central Nervous System Spinal Cord Transection Central Axon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Aguayo, A.J.; Bray, G.M.? Perkins, C.S.; and Ducan, I.D. 1979. Axon-sheath cell interactions in peripheral and central nervous system transplants. 1979 Soc. Neurosci. Symp. 4: 361–383.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Aguayo, A.J.; Bunge, R.P.; Duncan, I.D.; Wood, P.M.; and Bray, G.M. 1979. Rat Schwann cells cultured in vitro can ensheath axons regenerating in mouse nerves. Neurology (Minneapolis) 29: 589.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Aguayo, A.J.; Dickson, R.; Trecarten, J.; Atwell, M.; Bray, G.; and Richardson, P. 1978. Ensheathment and myelination of regenerating PNS fibers by transplanted optic nerve glia. Neurosci. Lett. 9: 97–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Aguayo, A.J.; Kasarjian, J.; Skamrnr, E.; Kongshavn, P.; and Bray, G.M. 1977. Myelination of mouse axons by Schwann cells transplanted from normal and abnormal human nerves. Nature (London) 268: 753–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Bostock, H., and McDonald, W.I. 1982. Recovery of function after demyelination. In Proceedings of the Dahlem Workshop on Neuronal-Glial Interrelationships: Ontogeny, Maintenance, Injury, Repair. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Bostock, H., and Sears, T.A. 1978. The internodal axon membrane: electrical excitability and continuous conduc-tion in segmental demyelination. J. Physiol. 280: 273–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Bostock, H.; Sherrat, R.M.; and Sears, T.A. 1978. Over-coming conduction failure in demyelinated nerve fibres by prolonging action potentials. Nature 274: 385–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Crutcher, K.A., and Davis, J.N. 1981. Sympathetic nor-adrenergic sprouting in response to central cholinergic denervation. Trends Neurol. Sci. 4/3: 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Gilliatt, R.W. 1981. Physical injury to peripheral nerves. Physiologic and electrodiagnostic aspects. Mayo Clin. Proc. 56: 361–370.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Goldman, P.S. 1971. Functional development of the prefrontal cortex in early life and the problem of neuronal plasticity. Exp. Neurol. 32: 366–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Goldman, P.S. 1972. Developmental determinants of cortical plasticity. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 32: 495–511.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Guth, L.; Brewer, C.R.; Collins, Jr., W.F.; Goldberger, M.E.; and Perl, E.R. 1980. Editorial commentary. Criteria for evaluating spinal cord regeneration experiments. Exp. Neurol. 69: 1–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Holmes, G. 1906. On the relation between loss of function and structural change in focal lesions of the central nervous system, with special reference to secondary degeneration. Brain 29: 514–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    Holmes, G., and Lister, W.T. 1916. Disturbances of vision from cerebral lesions, with special reference to the cortical representation of the macula. Brain 39: 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    Hossmann, K.A., and Kleihues, P. 1973. Reversibility of ischemic brain damage. Arch. Neurol. 29: 375–384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N. 1970. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J. Physiol. 206: 419–436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    Kennard, M.A. 1936. Age and other factors in motor recovery from precentral lesions in monkeys. Am. J. Physiol. 115: 138–146.Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    Kennard, M.A. 1940. Relation of age to motor impairment in man and in subhuman primates. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr. 44: 377–397.Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    Kling, A., and Tucker, T.J. 1968. Sparing of function following localized brain lesions in neonatal monkeys. In The Neuropsychology of Development, ed. R.L. Isaacson, pp. 121–146. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. (20).
    Krikorian, J.G.; Guth, L.; and Donati, E.J. 1981. Origin of the connective tissue scar in the transected rat spinal cord. Exp. Neurol. 72: 698–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    Kuypers, H.G.J.M. 1974. Recovery of motor function in rhesus monkeys. Neurosci. Res. Prog. Bull. 12/2: 240–244.Google Scholar
  22. (22).
    Lawrence, D.G., and Kuypers, H.G.J.M. 1968a. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain 91: 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    Lawrence, D.G., and Kuypers, H.G.J.M. 1968b. The func-tional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem path-ways. Brain 91: 15–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    Schuier, F.J., and Hossmann, K.-A. 1980. Experimental brain infarcts in cats. II. Ischemic brain edema. Stroke 11: 593–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    Sears, T.A., ed. 1982. Neuronal-glial Cell Interrelationships. Dahlem Konferenzen. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. (26).
    Sears, T.A.; Bostock, H.; and Sherrat, R.M. 1978. The pathophysiology of demyelination and its implication for the symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 28: 21–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. (27).
    Smith, K.J.; Blakemore, W.F.; and McDonald, W.I. 1979. Central remyelination restores secure conduction. Nature 280; 295–396.Google Scholar
  28. (28).
    Sunderland, S. 1978. Nerve and Nerve Injuries, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill, Livingstone.Google Scholar
  29. (29).
    Teuber, H.-L., and Rudel, R.G. 1962. Behavior after cerebral lesions in children and adults. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol. 4: 3–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (30).
    Upton, A.R.M., and McComas, A.J. 1973. Double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet II: 359–361.Google Scholar
  31. (31).
    Veraa, R.P., and Grafstein, B. 1981. Cellular mechanisms for recovery from nervous system injury: a conference re-port. Exp. Neurol. 71: 6–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (32).
    Weiss, P., and Hiscoe, H.B. 1948. Experiments on the mechanism of nerve growth. J. Exp. Zool. 107: 315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. S. Bernhard, Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.-J. Freund
    • 1
  • H. J. Bauer
    • 2
  1. 1.Neurologische KlinikUniversität DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Neurologische KlinikUniversität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations